Absolutely! Multiple, in fact. In order of preference:

1. Shut down the game, dissolve the company, and donate all remaining funds to a women's shelter.
2. Prosecute groomers instead of banning and threatening the people who are trying to stop the fuckers and crying about vigilantism even when the proper reporting channels are used.
3. Use AI for a beneficial purpose at least one goddamn time. Scan the text and voice communications (it's a public game, there is no expectation of privacy), flag suspicious exchanges for human review, then ban and report groomers.

Them having an office large enough to moderate in-game communications, on every popular language? They have some billions to spare. Serving kids requires a lot of work they have neglected for a very long time.

Facebook was a vehicle for hateful, genocidal messages in Myanmar, and they seemingly got of the hook having no person understanding local language on the market they occupied.

If Roblox primarily targets kids, they can't go without agressive moderation, psy-help on demand, things one would find obvious, but these are never required, not to say it's not that sexy as getting profits and cutting corners.

I don't know if their business model would be viable if they started things right from the beginning, but it would be more stressful to them to finally start doing something about that.

It's illegal to collect ANY data from children under 13. Facial scans are WAY worse than the anonymized use stats those laws were put in place to block

Can't protect them too much, though. Otherwise, how would the pedo-in-chief and his ilk get a fresh crop of sex slaves?

I would happily have more babies as children are fun.

Unfortunately that requires a partner who values intelligence, child development, learning and desires children. When I find such a unicorn I'll make as many babies as I can reasonably raise (probably like 2 or three more maximum)

and? Why do you want to enable pedos?

You are correct, Pedophiles also play.

Not even "can't afford". They're rolling in money. They merely made the calculation that paying lip service to the problem (and farming their user base for even more data to leverage, count on it) could cost less than future lawsuits.