54

The president’s Oval Office meeting with New York’s incoming leader is not open to the press.

Trump, 79, frequently invites reporters into the Oval Office for a front-seat view as he sits down with U.S. and world leaders, but, according to his schedule, the media was barred from his first meeting with Mamdani, the Democratic socialist 45 years his junior.

Their first face-to-face comes after Trump lobbed a series of nasty attacks on the political upstart who mounted an underdog campaign and went on to win the race to lead the largest city in the U.S.

Trump has blasted Mamdani as a “communist lunatic” and “not very smart.” He falsely accused him of being in the country illegally, threatened to arrest him, and warned that he would cut off money to New York if he won.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

He's called taco for a reason

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I don't like it, with press present harder for Trump to bull some bullshit. Behind closed doors anything can happen. They could claim he tried to attack trump why he had to be killed. For fucksakes they called him a terrorist. No way he should be meeting the president in private.

[-] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

A tired taco

[-] becausechemistry@lemy.lol 4 points 1 week ago

I am once again begging people to not post headlines that start with “Trump, 79,” that doesn’t end with. Well. You know. The start of the party.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Honestly, I think this is the best option. Nothing good would have come of their conversation being in public.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

Why not? Mamdani would absolutely smoke him

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I just don’t think that’s the purpose of them talking. It’s not meant to be a public fight between 2 people, which is what it would turn into.

I imagine Trump will possibly be more receptive to Mamdani’s comments in that private than in public.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

I imagine Trump will possibly be more receptive to Mamdani’s comments in that private than in public.

In what way? Because I hate to remind you but Trump is a literal fascist.

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It's now after the meeting, go watch the press conference and tell me trump isn't absolutely smitten with Mamdani.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Well I guess I'll be eating my words I have no idea what the hell is going on here.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the same way that the 50 year mortgage guy got Trump on board despite all his aides and everyone else hating it. Hes not a hard man to trick.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

He keeps trying to pass himself off as a smart man, and there's just no way to keep up that act if you've got an actually smart man talking to you.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago

You're right, there are secret meetings between powerful individuals that should remain hidden from public knowledge

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Not every conversation needs to be public.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Not every conversation, but every conversation between powerful individuals.

And maybe that's an impractical standard, but the spirit of it is more liberating than letting corruption fester in the darkness.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

It is an impractical standard. While I understand where you’re coming from, I think sometimes you need to allow people an opportunity to talk without every word being judged.

If the meeting is public, then it will never be a true conversation. It will be 2 people giving prepared statements in the form of a conversation.

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

taco strikes again

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The press secretary said the meeting speaks to the fact that Trump is willing to meet with anyone to do what’s right on behalf of the American people, but she didn’t let it go without attempting a dig at the mayor-elect and Democratic Party.

“I will just add, it speaks volumes that tomorrow we have a communist coming to the White House because that’s who the Democrat Party elected mayor of the largest city in the country,” she said

It really does...

Just not in the way she thinks it does.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

press secretary

Democrat Party

This is the fucking press secretary talking like a child. It's like hearing an adult that still mispronounces words and says things like "supposably" instead of supposedly. They also think it's some big own, but collectively, they all look like children and I want to see the press grow a spine and ask them why they do this. I mean, Donvict is calling them "piggy" and other insults anyway, they might as well ask about this as well.

Start shaming these motherfuckers, even over what is something others might call "trivial" - this is an orchestrated thing and has been for decades.

Imagine if every single Democratic politician, every single talking head, everywhere were to sync up on a misnomer for the Republican Party and start using that. It is not like it would not pass without comment, but for some reason, all these assholes, from the very top, always and constantly walk around saying "Democrat Party" with a shit-eating grin on their face. They know what they are doing, and NOT commenting on it is not doing anyone any favors.

[-] DaMummy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

In boxing, you don't pay off the winner.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Seems like Mandami got the Bubba treatment

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

He’s going to be the mayor of NYC. He has no choice but to meet with the President. Besides, he’s upholding a campaign promise to meet with anyone (see article).

After all the shit Trump said about home during the election, the shit the press secretary said about the “communist coming to the White House,” the absolute best thing Mamdani can do right now is nothing. Let these idiots fall over themselves backtracking and unsaying all the shit they’ve spewed. All he has to do is stand there with a smile and not say shit. Even if Trumps base never comes around on him, he was never going to win those people. He’s already won all he was ever going to win when Trump said positive things about him after the meeting. No need for him to say anything else. Just go back to NY, wake up tomorrow and get on with his life.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

Why does a Mayor have no choice but to meet with the president? Governor maybe but mayor don't care if its one of the biggest cities.

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

I overstated. He’s not “required,” but it’s pretty common for the NY mayor to meet with the president after being elected. Mainly for all the reasons already stated. They may not like one another, but in both cases the voters chose their leaders, so they have to work in the same company as one another.

[-] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

He has a larger constituency that many governors

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Any Democrat or progressive worth a damn shouldn't meet with him on camera. He'd rather have sound bytes than actual productive conversation.

[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I am very cynical. I don't think there will be productive conversation happening in private either. I'd be more inclined to think threats and intimidation will be the brunt of it. The orange turd thinks he's a mobster, but does have the backing of Russia and Israel.

[-] aaaa@piefed.world -1 points 1 week ago

I like this headline

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26496 readers
676 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS