32
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Having worked with vendors in the print industry, I'm wondering if at least some of this is a scaling issue in the edit. Because the "tall and thin" type is exactly the same height as the rest.

Maybe there was a version that was more distinct, and a layout guy standardized them without seeing or reading the copy.

Maybe that's too much benefit of the doubt.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

At that point, the layout person is either a dumbass or doesn't read English.

[-] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Or maybe can't even see the copy. They may be looking at lorem ipsum.

[-] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

Just take those exact characters, give them different hair colors, match the personality to the hair color, boom you got a slice of life show that has a strong first season but then fades in quality and takes a weird turn in season 2+3 before a mediocre season 4 that fans try to justify but everyone really hates.

WyVvqrKmOYMVCaC.jpg

[-] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

those hair colors, is this a DV-i reference or something

edit: the personalities match as well wtf

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I really wish there was more evolution in anime. I used to like it a lot but I've grown to really dislike the art style because it's so homogenous. I'm sure I'm missing out on great stories but I'm so damn bored of cookie cutter kawaii characters

I know that's not every anime so no need to reply with the exceptions to the rule. The two most popular styles are "generic anime" (this) and "chibi anime" (creepy/gross)

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

If you're looking for more unique styles of anime, try out jojo's bizarre adventure or dorohedoro. Both have quite a unique drawing style (for anime) and world building

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

... and people get mad at me when I say this now bog standard, seemingly literally standardized anime art style is uninspired, boring, and fundamentally problematic.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unrelated: did you know that the term "bog standard" comes from the term "box standard" which means, essentially, vanilla. No modifications or additions, just the basic version in the box. This used to be on the boxes for things people bought.

Now it basically means the same thing but to a none native speaker bog standard would likely not make much sense, where box standard has the context in the term.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I genuinely did not know that.

Makes complete sense though!

... and yes, English is a ridiculous nonsense language, we can and routinely do things like verb(ify) nouns, we have tons of idioms and slang that well... barely even make sense to many native speakers... we have tons of homophones like threw through, their there they're... etc...

everything is fundamentally problematic if you want to see a problem in everything.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are you implying my tastes are a result of intentional cyncism?

They are not.

I just get bored of looking at the same thing all the time.

Thats not like, an active choice I am making.

yeah ok but boring and problematic are two different things.

when you say "anime art style is [...] fundamentally problematic" i assume you mean "it caters too much to the male gaze".

i'm sick of people saying "anime is creepy because it displays women in a way that are attractive to men". typically, it gets connected to "patriarchy" and "creepiness" through the lens of mainstream social discourse today.

i say the only damage done by creeps is if they are in real life and pester other people around them. people are not gonna change their nature. creeps are gonna be creeps. but at least you can shift them to the internet, to fictional and non-personal media, away from real life. and that's a good thing, and only possible if anime continues to exist.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah ok.

So, I don't think that it 'centers the male gaze'.

I barely even know what that actually means, these days.

I'm not generally worried by the idea of trying to convey people who are attractive, in their own right, when viewed by men or women or anything else.

You can do that in a bad way via characterization or plot or whatever, but I'm just talking about the art style of the drawing.

I do find a lot of the relationship archetypes/dynamics in a lot of anime problematic, but I'm again trying to just talk about the art style.

I'm also not saying that like, "all anime presents bad socialization examples and standards."

Sure, some kinda do, some really do, but there's tons of great anime that doesn't, that doesn't showcase that, or if it does, that character is bsd because they do that, or its a flaw, where it is good when they overcome it.

It is just a fact of human beings that we basically all judge each other as beautiful or not, to some extent, so... it would be ridiculous to just completely eliminate that from shows.


What I do think this style does, for both boys and girls, though the effect is usually much worse on girls...

Is that it fundamentally promotes unrealistic beauty / self-image standards, if you don't actually have a parent explaining some of this kind of stuff to them.

If you had an actual human being, approaching any of the body forms in OP image, well you are basically descibing an anorexic person.

Well ok, other than what is here labelled 'full figured', which, if you just replaced the head with a human proportioned head, would be probably what I'd call a skinny or skinnier person, but probably not so skinny that its like, de facto medically concerning.

But this is still bad, because now, if you are in reality skinny, you may think you are basically chubby.

Its exactly the same critique I'd have of older Barbie dolls.

Also, real people have noses, anime characters basically do not.

You should not be ashamed to have a nose.


I really do think that a lot of more vulnerable people get some kind of body dysmorphia complex from being overly immersed in this, if they don't have a parent who like, checks in on them from time to time, actually explains that some elements of a characters style are reasonable to try and emulate, others are very unrealistic and unreasonable to try and emulate.

Girls compete so, so much amongst themselves over who is the prettiest, most desirable, and if you have unrealistic standards for that, it can create self image problems, especially in households that already are not doing a great job of raising their kids.

There, that's the angle by which I find this style 'fundamentally problematic'.

Not really even a feminist, social dynamics angle, more of just a healthy young mind / child development angle.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Also fat, fatter, fatass, fatterass, full zipcode, city size, state size, continental, hemispherical, planetary, solar, black hole-like, Galactical, interstatial, universal and beyond luminal.

These can be combined for yo momma jokes.

[-] Oberyn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Anime girl with d cup breaststroke slightly thick thighs most chubby anime person peops can handle before they start getting scared

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I never noticed before that all girls are knock-kneed.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

It's somehow preferred in Japan.

[-] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

But those are the same picture...

[-] Korval@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep, I'm afraid Gladaed is right; definitely different pictures. When she posed for the sketches, she did something different with her arms each time. She sometimes changed her expression too. Oh, and one day she wore a shorter shirt.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org -1 points 1 month ago

No. They are very much not. All are rather fit though.

[-] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

If by "fit" you mean slim. None of these women look like they work out

[-] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago

Don't forget to give the eyes 10x the surface area of what's biologically possible

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In a lot of Asia, youth is seen as attractive

Human eyeballs are generally all the same size, regardless of skull or body size.

Youth = small

Big eyes and small everything else therefore means cute

Art often exaggerates or interprets

Anime is art

Anime is also not a new medium at all in Japanese, and now global culture, and has had a lot of time to evolve

I'm not defending it, just explaining it, in case people don't understand, because this is a long-standing and very common complaint/criticism

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But we could have like, a whole anime done in the style of Ukiyo-E, for characters design style motifs, for facial and body proportions..

You could mock up a 3D model and cel shade these to work out how they'd work from different angles.

This is certainly an exaggerated interpretation of reality.

It is also certainly Japanese.

These were also largely seen as depictions of beautiful, desirable people.

Here, this one's from 1932,

The eyes are getting bigger, but noses still exist, the facial proportions are actually pretty close to realistic, if not just completely realistic, unlike in the modern standard anime style.

I dunno, I guess the modern standard anime style is just much much more neotenous (oversized heads, relatively oversized eyes, relatively undersized/unemphaszed noses) because it is meant to appeal primarily to small children, who are themselves neotenous?

Whereas the consumer base for Ukiyo-E would have been primarily adults?

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because it is meant to appeal primarily to small children

That notion is Disneys fault. East-asians usually see comic juat as a distinct art type, for grown-ups too.

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

One of the earliest "modern" manga artists got influenced by the large eyes of disney and other western comics and shows
And others adapted it

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, thats a very good point!

And the stylistic intermingling has certainly gone both ways a bit, and then more recently, quite a lot.

Now we have like, basically hyperrealism done on anime proportions, the kind of AI autogen art style, that I would basically call 'uncanny valley with high production value.'

But we could have like, a whole anime done in the style of Ukiyo-E, for characters design style motifs, for facial and body proportions…

What you're forgetting is that anime (and art in general) is typically not done to please the critics, but to please the fans.

[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

"Biologically possible", I mean, quite a few animals have eyes taking up a ton of their headspace. Owls for starters.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

... Unless you are planning on hybridizing an owl and a human, in pursuit of growing your own GMO Waifu...

I think we can safely assume the scope of the context is 'a human being'.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh really? Have you ever seen a person in the shape of a rhomboid?

[-] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago

Your mother was a rhomboid

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And your father smelt of irregular polyhedrons

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

MY mother was a rhomboid, you insensitive clod

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Why are they all pigeon-toed?

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

"well-balanced propotions" that's comic.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Strikes me as the same girl drawn once for every year in high school, from left to right junior, senior, sophomore, freshman.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The second doesn't have the coveted "thigh gap", signaling that you are sufficiently anorexic. The third has the faintest shadow of muscle definition in her biceps and calves. The fourth remembered to wear socks, a thing only tall people do

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Frigging tall girls and their (checks notes) socks. Why do they ALWAYS wear them.

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

One is missing an eye. Sucks to be her.

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

8464 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS