99
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 2 months ago

And so it begins. Abandon all progressive ideas to appeal to the "centrist", only to lose to the fascist again. I hate it here.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Gavin never supported progressive ideals?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

Eh, early in his term he did a bunch of good stuff, it's just rightly overshadowed by the bad stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

You can't abandon ideals that you never held.

[-] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

I got a fiver that says he has to try to walk this back when he runs “the most progressive campaign in us history” in 2028.

I mean, how lucky are we? Hillary, Biden, Kamala, all with “the most progressive platform” ever!

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

oh yeah, totally feeling lucky, think I'll go buy a lottery ticket.

edit: I lost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The only reason Newsom has had any interest from the broader electorate is that he was outspoken in opposing Trump. The minute he enters the primary and starts spouting the same valueless, donor-approved, corporate drivel as Kamala, Jefferies, Schumer, etc., he's going to flame out fast.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Remember Democrats, if he's the Democrat option come election time it's TOO LATE TO bitch!!

Fucking primaries!! They matter they are the only real choice! Organize, cavas suppot real progressives!

But once the national election comes up, I better not hear any fucking bitching, and you better line up becuase 4 years of president Vance is going to kick you in the nuts.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

I don't like him, he's just another Republican-lite establishment Democrat, like Obama, or the Clintons. He used to be married to Kimberly Guilfoyle, before she became Don Jr's concubine (Now she's in exile as the Greek Ambassador, to shut her up), so he must be tolerant enough of MAGA nonsense to marry one.

I'm so sick of these people claiming to be our saviors every four years, and when they get in, they spend ALL their efforts appeasing corrupt pedophile traitors, even when they have the power to crush them.

We've seen what MAGA is capable of, and what they want in the future. When the power flips, we have to fight fire with fire, and ruthlessly purge MAGA from our government and our society, and I doubt Newsome is the guy for the job. He's just another water-carrier for the Sociopathic Oligarchs, which California has lots of.

But if he's the nominee, then that's who I'll vote for over ANY MAGA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 7101334@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Gavin Newsom takes money from AIPAC and knows he can't justify it, and has expressed support for Zionist Israel. Just like Holocaust Harris, I will not vote for anyone who supports genocide. If signing my name to greenlight genocide is the cost of "democracy" (actually oligarchy with some publicly-funded democracy theater), then the price is too high and I refuse.

load more comments (11 replies)

I'd vote for Newsom if he's the nominee, but I really hope he's not the nominee (assuming, obviously, the relative utopian future where we get to vote in 2028).

I'm glad when his media exposure goals overlap with doing actual good things, but - and I may be putting too fine a point on it - he's basically Hillary if Hillary had a penis and was super jazzed about it, and I am fairly confident I know the smug look he makes when he smells his own farts.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

He's fully bought by aipac. A vote for him is a vote to murder children and civilians.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This and he was married to that thing Don Jr. was with.

Yuck.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

On the side of the billionaires and the zionists. He'll be the next president for sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] j4k3@piefed.world 11 points 2 months ago

This guy fuckmurders the homeless while whoring for billionaires. Why the fuck should anyone vote for this prick?

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

He's also pro-genocide.

[-] NeilBru@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

His sales pitch is centered around "I'm not a Republican^tm^!"

Most people on this planet don't lose a second of sleep or shed one tear if the poor die, including the poor.

On the assumption that we are able to vote at the time, if it's between him and <insertAuthoritarianDouchebagHere>, I'll vote for him.

However, I'd imagine that most of my fellow U. S. Citizens are well aware that this sheister is not some sort of "friend" of the poor and the middle class.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

FINALLY. Someone thinking about the billionaires.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Well, then, fuck him.

[-] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Billionaire tax should be 99%, no breaks or deductions. Boom I said it.

Even double digit millionaires shouldn't exist.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Anything networh over 10 million should be taxed 100%. hard stop, hard cap.

Companies too should now be able to grow beyond 1 billion in net worth. Anything over that, 100% tax

NO MORE MULTIMILLIONAIRES! NOT ANYWHERE

Ladies and gentelmen, California Bush

[-] KingOfTheWickerPeople@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Is anyone really surprised? He's just a neoliberal that's had a lot of good press this year.

[-] criscodisco@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If this is the Democratic candidate, and there is no adequate progressive 3rd party candidate, 2028 will be the first election I sit out since 2000.

I am DONE accepting milquetoast corporate right wing democrats just because they aren’t literally insane. John Kerry was my first, and Kamala Harris is my last. I swear to fucking god.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

This and he was married to that thing Don Jr. was with.

Yuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

At this point in time I'm pretty sure you would win in a landslide if you ran on taxing billionaires. Is being greedy a requirement to be a politician in the US?

[-] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago

If you're not greedy, the billionaires won't fund your campaign. Then you lose.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Jon Stewart, 2028.

The problem with Reagan and Trump isn't that they were actors. The problem is that they were complete pieces of shit long before they were elected.

Actor-presidents have demonstrated a natural propensity for revolutionary disruption of entrenched attitudes. Reagan completely fucked over economic policy; Trump is completely fucking over the fundamental concept of democracy.

Imagine that same degree of revolutionary disruption moving us toward egalitarianism rather than corpo-fascism.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Zelenski worked out pretty well for Ukraine.

He's not a saint, but he's been pretty damn good by understanding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"b... b... bUt alL tHe BiLliOnAiReS wILl rUn aWAy. TRiCkLe DoWn eCoNoMiCs, sOmeThIng, SoMeThIng" - bootlicking cunt

Newsom has received campaign cash from billionaires such as Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings, philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, among others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I really hope that Democrats are starting to realize that corporate captured performance artists like Gavin Newsom are why we have been lurching rightward into fascism for 40+ years. They are why there’s been no meaningful opposition. Newsome doesn’t believe in anything beyond a vague allegiance to capital interests and his own career advancement. Sometimes that ethos will cause him to say some good things, and sometimes he’ll do the opposite. But, he’ll never, ever meaningfully change anything at all.

The best case scenario with a Newsom presidency is that he will preside over a temporary slowing of the collapse, while sowing the seeds of further escalation by the white-identity, religious authoritarian dominionists that are flourishing under trump. Democrats, Americans, and the world deserve much more than him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VampirePenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

If Newsom wins the primary, I'm out. I'd rather fight fascism on the streets than play this stupid ass good cop, bad cop game for another round. Fuck you, Democrats. Learn.

[-] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Doozer@piefed.world 3 points 2 months ago

Liberals gonna liberal.

I'd still rather have a capitalist than a fascist.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah that's the thing about capitalists: They come as a package with fascists.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

I mean c’mon, let’s not get too carried away, next thing ya know they’ll be wanting to tax the billionaires or something.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

We deserve it. Eating our own tail for years as the world burns and everyone points fingers.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

Slimey as fuck I hate that guy

[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't vote for Gavin if he was the Democratic candidate. He is just as horrible as the other Democrats.

We need true change and true leaders that will change the government to work for the working class instead of the wealthy.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Gonna have to change that stance if he wants to run on the Dem ticket in the year of our lord 2028.

Cuz everyone gonna be REAL fucking mad at billionaires by then if things keep going the way they are.

[-] 7101334@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The Dems rigged the election against Bernie to protect billionaires, then had a court declare that they were legally within their right to rig it. What makes you think they care how angry the average person is at their owners?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
99 points (97.1% liked)

politics

27829 readers
817 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS