787
Anon is a fan of GabeN (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago

This is such a controversial person to discuss. On one hand, loot boxes, the steam market for trading, and a lot of gambling and profiteering going on. At the same time, all of the OP comments are also true.

Out of all the billionaires, I dislike gaben the least. The net good he's done for gaming may not balance the scales entirely, but at least there's a discussion to be had whether what gaben has done is for the better, or for the worse. Which is more than I can say about most billionaires I know of.

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago

Hot take: ...but it's just fucking gaming tho... He's not fucking with manifesting some bullshit ideology throughout the world, he's not trying to leave his mark on history... And if he is, it's as a chill dude who gave us all a better alternative to piracy.

[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 days ago

he’s not trying to leave his mark on history

He kind of is, but in the way old-school millionaires did - he has purchased a MASSIVE yacht and turned it into an ocean-floor research laboratory, either donated it to a university, or just allows researchers to use it.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Gabe was already wealthy with Microsoft money when he founded Valve, so when his new private startup found success he didn't feel the pressure to go public, expand, dilute, and cash out. He made the judgement call that they already had enough talent internally to keep playing the hits while keeping all the profit for themselves, and he was right. I'm sure a little bit a business ideology reinforces Gabe's long-term outlook for Valve, but he's ultimately enabled by a happy intersection of pre-existing wealth, great timing, and careful hiring choices.

[-] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

I mean, he is developing the brain chip with his Starfish Neuroscience company but its supposed to be minimally invasive and let's be real if its between his and Elon Musks (which is NOT minimally invasive and requires surgical implantation) I'm definitely going with his.

I wouldn't say at this point its all about gaming though. Valve is, but not necessarily Gabe. Which I don't mind but I could understand how some people wouldn't like it.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago
[-] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Fair. But its important to point out this won't be one that goes inside you it will be one that you put on the outside of your head that interacts with brain impulses, at least according to them.

If I was someone with limited mobility or some other sort of handicap I would do that before I got the one that goes inside my skull. But that's just me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] n0respect@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You know, I think those are inevitable ... any potentially evil technology shown in sci-fi will eventually be created irl; it's like some kind of rule (trust me). Given this, the future is a duality: it's either GabeN or a random billionaire. I want this potentially-abusive technology with devil that I know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

Lets pray valve never goes public

[-] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Why would they?

The fuck do they need investors for?

[-] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Depends on who gets the crown - or prices thereof - when Gabe passes. There are lots of cases where the beneficiary of an estate can't afford to keep the asset due to a lack of liquidity, and is forced to sell.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 18 points 6 days ago

I'd say Zuckerberg's $77B disaster is not a forced mistake but a self-influcted wound. If anything, it's the Cambridge Analytica scandal that pushed him towards the rebrand they would have been better off without.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Steam refused to issue refunds for a long, long time. In the end they started allowing refunds for everyone because governments started requiring it and it was easier to just allow them for everyone than having to do the legal footwork to have different policies based on geography.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I'm pretty reluctant to be this flattening towards Gabe Newell and Valve.

Once Google was seen as one of the good companies. "Googling" became synonimous with searching on the internet. Most if not all competitors went bankrupt. When Google was accused of monopolistic behavior, its fans treated it as an attack on "perfection". Google Chrome was a fast browser requiring less memory than its competitors. People saw them owning YouTube as a good thing. The most common form of toxicity towards new users in the Linux community was only providing lmgtfy links to them (I did get the occasional custom WinXP ISO torrent link too). Even their motto was don't be evil.

And then came the YouTube content ID system. And then they were reluctant to throw off the far-right from their platform for breaking their ToS during Gamergate. Then they dropped the motto. Then they put ads into the Google search results. Then they let the far-right control their platform before the 2024 elections. And also they're pushing AI hard.

Will Gabe Newell stick to his ideas, or get an anyeurism and join the Trump oligarchs?

[-] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago

How do you write all this and fail to mention that search doesn't even fucking work anymore?

I'm not arguing with you. But internet searching aDOEA NOT WORK ANYMROE.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago

It is fair to compare Google to Valve only in a category of "once been good". Other than that, 2 different companies with 2 different mottos.

[-] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

So, you are afraid to have an opinion in case future events make it invalid?

How do you support literally anything with this mindset?

Elon Musk might be haunted by the three spirits of not being racist this christmas and give away all his possessions. Nonetheless, I'm happy to call him wanker today, because it's an accurate representation of reality at present.

[-] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Thing is Valve is a private company with a flat structure and shared ownership that encourages moving between departments.

Basically, it's just a club of people doing whatever they want and they happen to all love videogames.

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

The power vacuum this man will leave behind sucks.

[-] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

How does it taste? The cock of a Gabe?

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

Ok GabeN junior

Also, steam deck and steam machines aren't sold at a loss

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The steam deck was sold at a loss

The steam machine doesn't have a price yet

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago

Got a source for that? Best I can find are "implications", like Gaben saying the deck's pricing is "very aggresive" and that the parts used sum up to roughly 1k dollars

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Commander_Keen@reddthat.com 4 points 6 days ago

Love live Lord Gaben!

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I was not given a refund when MH World launched on PC in a broken, framelocked, constantly disconnecting state.

I tried and I was not granted one.

[-] fosho@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

"gaymers"

intentional or not?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
787 points (96.0% liked)

Greentext

7454 readers
1202 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS