11

"I’ll be honest, I had no idea that this is what I was going to be doing,” says Piker from his Los Angeles studio. “Like, if someone were to ask me, did you ever think that you’d become a Twitch streamer? I’d be like, what is Twitch? The concept of a YouTube influencer didn’t even exist when I was growing up.” It’s the morning and he’s preparing to start his daily 11am show. He usually broadcasts live for seven or eight hours straight, talking off the cuff about current affairs, lifestyle stories, what he’s up to, playing video games, reacting to memes and media clips, and interacting with the constant stream of messages that scroll by in the top left corner of the screen.

It’s a communal experience; a good hang, you might say. It also sounds exhausting. He has estimated that in 2020 he spent 42% of the entire year livestreaming. “I’ve lowered it to seven hours a day, but sometimes I still do eight. And on top of that, I’ll take Sundays off now.” He’s already running late this morning. As we continue talking, his Twitch chatter begins to fill with “where the hell is he?” posts.

Establishing himself on Twitch, which is primarily a platform for livestreaming video games (and has been owned by Amazon since 2014), was a conscious decision, Piker says. His media career started out with The Young Turks, the progressive online news network co-founded by his maternal uncle, Cenk Uygur. Piker’s parents are Turkish immigrants, and he grew up between New Jersey and Istanbul before studying political science and communication studies at Rutgers University. He graduated to hosting his own show on The Young Turks in 2016 – earning the title “Woke Bae” in the process – but in 2018 he decided to go solo on Twitch, to counterbalance what he saw as the overwhelmingly rightwing, often racist, misogynistic and xenophobic views that infested the space. “There’s a lot of ideological diversity amongst the gamers, amongst the developers, amongst the consumers, but unfortunately, the market for political expression in this hobby is so heavily dominated by the right, and that’s the same for pretty much everything,” he says.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stickly@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The controversy over his public presence (both real and contrived) has convinced me that if you want to be any kind of serious public figure you should never-ever-ever put anything off-hand in text or on video. Let alone stream yourself for hours at a time.

Take some time to compile your thoughts and don't just spit out hot takes. It'll get you attention for sure, but it's not worth the scrutiny and drama hunting. For real, look at the people in this thread latched onto a single clip of a dog yelping weeks (months?) ago. Is that such a core and defining feature that I should completely discredit him? Doesn't seem like it, but I also don't want to dig through hours of content to find out.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

It's a double edged sword. If he didn't stream so much he never would have gotten so popular that anyone would bother combing over his footage for stuff to criticize.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Hasan is doing important work.

[-] pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'm not going to down vote this because he does bring attention to topics that get sweep under the rug in the main stream but he's had so many controversial moments that he refuses to take any fault on that is hard to be a fan of his now a days.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm not a fan, never liked the guy, but the whole streaming underworld is just so silly. The guy spends whole days talking about random shit live and I'm sure there's hundredths of right wingers scrutinizing every second of it trying to find anything that could discredit him. Of course he will have "controversial moments". If by now that's all there is he has to be a real fucking saint. I still don't like him thought.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I've been watching him more and more recently, and I wouldn't even say he's talking shit. He's genuinely level-headed and makes good points. It's the reason so many people like him.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 months ago

I meant that as "he's talking about everything without a script, deep analysis of public opinion or PR team". If I tried that people would burn at the stake after the first hour. Both left and right wingers.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wasn’t he abusing his dog with a shock collar so it wouldn’t interrupt his streams?

[-] JPAKx4@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

It was a vibration collar that he didn't even use in the infamous clip. He is friends with tons of people that would cruicify him if he used a shock collar

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

No. There's one clip of his dog probably pinching her nail on her bed and yelping and the internet took that as proof of abuse. The collar she wears vibrates, not shocks.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

I’m not so sure, there are plenty of clips that point to him using a shock collar.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's a single clip (the only clip) and then additional clips about said clip.

If he shocks his dog to get her to obey, there wouldn't be one clip of it, there would be dozens. The dude streams 48-56 hours a week and this is the only time? How would that be possible? It doesn't pass the sniff test.

He's had dozens of people come to stream with him. Someone would've said something by now, but it's only crickets.

These are armchair detectives spurred on by Hasan's rivals and nothing I've seen suggests otherwise.

[-] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 months ago

abusing animals is important work?

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I have seen dog yelping way worse for various reasons, even if they just wanted attention (getting headpats). A lot of dogs just yelp if they're caught of wrongdoing.

The right won't like you better if you spread their made up crap about supposedly "too far left" public figures. They want all public figures left of Mussolini gone from public life, not just the radical ones. All you're doing is helping the right to control the narrative (wouldn't surprise me if there were Discord servers and Facebook groups for this: allegedly the whole wizard game drama was made worse by such groups), and maybe even bury legitimate critique under bad faith arguments.

[-] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Conversely, I think Hasan is fucking libpilled. He's DemSoc at best.

[-] Entertain529@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Most of the time lefties I speak with agree with Hasans analysis whether they know it or not..

I have been watching Hasan for many years and enjoy his content, but am aware that there are lefties that don't like him. But that's fine.. When it comes to spreading stories/issues/topics, what's important to talk about are the stories/issues/topics themselves. Hasan doesn't need to be involved in the conversation at all (I believe Hasan has even said this himself).

Yes I find his analysis usually correct and his personality entertaining (not 100% of the time), but I can still talk about the topics covered with friends and family without mentioning Hasan. He's just one of many ways to receive the news.

[-] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

He is based and a great antagonist to the right-wing dominated streaming landscape.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

The neat thing about Hasan is that his hate machine has to resort to manufacturing controversy about him.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Personally I just don't like Hasan. Call me a twitchy autist but something about him sets off my dislike button. May just be his personality being basically the opposite of what I like in general but still me don't like.

[-] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

This man is so annoying. I don't want to see him or his stupid turtlenecks anymore.

[-] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

He's a content grifting nepo baby.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk -1 points 2 months ago

Shocking🐕‍🦺

[-] Vincentmario@feddit.uk -1 points 2 months ago
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz -3 points 2 months ago

How is a dog abusing twitch streamer's paid pr ad news?

Has Hasan done a single political thing other than larp as a revolutionary at a few Gaza rallies in already very democrat states? Oh wait he has, he has undermined democrats for years leading up to the 2024 elections and got exactly what he wanted with this trump presidency.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The dog abusing conspiracy is just as skizo, as those "hidden subliminal messages in movies" conspiracy theories of the past.

There are many legitimate reasons to criticize Hasan for, but some will just undermine the legitimate critiques.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz -4 points 2 months ago

Shocking your dog is a legitimate reason and there is good evidence that he did it and tried to cover it up.

Its not the worst thing ever. You're right that hes done worse.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Watched all the "evidence" collection videos, all reminded me of those "it has a triangle, so it's made by the illuminati" videos I used to watch to laugh at. Hasan has a quite irrational hatedom, and people will grasp every chance to be angry at him, not to mention his most passionate haters (the right) have learned how to control the narrative.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 2 months ago

I didnt need to watch any of the evidence collection videos. I saw the original clip and then the clip where he "showed" the collar. It was pretty obvious he was obscuring the shock part of the collar. If it truely wasnt a shock collar he would have just shown the collar and cleared it up instantly.

He has a lot of haters but that isnt a defense. He also has just as many loyalist fans who rush to defend him.

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
11 points (86.7% liked)

News

36179 readers
514 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS