36
submitted 2 days ago by lemuria@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Things along the range of:

"Checklist - 1. Ensure that the thing is on."

I've seen stories of people who just don't get it and need their hands held all the time, so what are things where you kinda feel that things are a bit too "hand-holdy"?

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] narwhal@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I recently bought a scale for weighting food and had a good laugh reading the manual when I saw "not to be used for illicit substance trade". I imagined some small time drug dealer reacting "damn it".

[-] FrederikNJS@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

I have a very nice scale that is accurate to 0.1 g and updates very rapidly, because I'm a coffee nerd, and need the precision to accurately dose my espresso. But one of the jokes in the community is that the only two groups of people that need scales like these are coffee people and drug dealers...

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

There was a toy batman costume that had the warning. Cape does not enable user to fly. Granted its for kids but common. Its not a superman cape!

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I had to send an email telling people that part of the installation process of a new application is that they need to restart the computer. Restarting the computer involves clicking the power button and clicking shutdown, closing the lid and then immediately opening it again is not restarting it.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I once took a photograph of a pack of batteries that stated the warranty didn't cover sudden battery discharges due to acts of God, or something like that.

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago

"New study finds 'Trickle Down Economics' has not trickled down in any way over the last ~~30~~ ~~40~~ 50 years"

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Some economist please corrcxt me if I'm wrong, but: Trickle down may not work. However, trickle up should.

If you do say, UBI, people will spend the stuff. And the money will go to the big players. They'll buy their food at Walmart. Or meds at Target Pharmacy. Or get a loan at JP Morgan.

Unlike, say Walmart, who won't buy their huge private jet collection from the swathes of less-than-well-off people across all of America.

So even if UBI made people lazy, even if it made people less productive, the money will still disproportionately end up in the hands of the rich.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Trickle down is based on the mistaken assumption that rich people will spend all their money in the local community. When often they don't spend their money at all and just save it, and when they do spend it it's on expensive yachts in Monaco. They're not contributing to the economy in which they live.

The millionaire class were delighted when they saw this idiotic take and pushed its narrative knowing full well that it would be to their advantage.

I don't think I've ever heard it called a trickle up economics but yeah, it would work because most people have no choice but to spend locally. If I got some money from the government I would buy food in the local supermarket or get my house redecorated by a local tradesman.

Various tests of UBI have shown that it doesn't really increase laziness beyond the base level it was already at, after all it's mostly the rich who are lazy anyway, as they're the only ones who have the resources. All it really happens is people want more time off work because they can subsidise their income with UBI, but that is an expected and desired outcome as it means more people will be employed to cover the difference which gets more people in work and therefore paying taxes.

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Don't flush gloves down the toilet." I think I might still have a picture I took of the sign somewhere.

Yep, rubber gloves specifically

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do they mean latex gloves like you might use in a hospital or do they mean actual rubber gloves you would use for washing up. Need to makes any sense.

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

"Do not wash hands with boiling water"

During my time there, two people broke the rule.

[-] 18107@aussie.zone 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Written on a window: "Please use door ->".

The window only goes down to waist height, it doesn't even look like a door. I really want to know the story behind that sign.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Troubleshooting tips on the inside lid of a washing machine.

Problem: Washer does not start.
Possible Cause: Lid is open.
Solution: Close the lid.

And so on.

[-] IWW4@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

It is my favorite line from the Patrick Swayze movie Roadhouse.

Sign seen in men’s room of a dive bar.

DON’T EAT THE BIG WHITE MINT!

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 11 points 2 days ago

Caution: For External Use Only

The curling iron nice way of saying "don't stick this hot thing in you."

[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[-] 18107@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

To give a quick highlight, because this case is often politicized and misrepresented:

The plaintiff, Stella Liebeck (1912–2004), a 79-year-old woman, purchased hot coffee from a McDonald's restaurant, accidentally spilled it in her lap, and suffered third-degree burns in her pelvic region. She was hospitalized for eight days while undergoing skin grafting, followed by two years of medical treatment. [...]

Liebeck's attorneys argued that, at 180–190 °F (82–88 °C), McDonald's coffee was defective, and more likely to cause serious injury than coffee served at any other establishment.

So, the lawsuit never demanded McDonald's to put a warning that you're not supposed to spill hot coffee on yourself. It argued that it's an unnecessary safety hazard, because the coffee was served at hazardous temperatures.
No matter how many warnings you put down, it can happen that someone spills coffee on themselves and they shouldn't need to be hospitalized from that.

[-] ethaver@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

Almost every other animal dies pretty quickly after having their last round of children / losing fertility, but humans live almost twice as long. Elders have a literal hardcoded purpose in human evolution.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because human offspring are so damn needy and take so long to mature.

[-] flamiera@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 days ago

I'm seeing this a lot with how people post on some instances in the fediverse. I've already made like several reports alone of the some of the posts people have made where they just simply disregard the rules of the instance. It isn't to be a dick, its just pointing out the obtuse behavior some people have in regards to the rules in place.

If you want your posts to stick better, learn to read the rules. It is not that hard. And it isn't like the rules are like miles long as they would be in Reddit. They're short, comprehensible and not as confusing.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

51666 readers
478 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS