532
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

Next thing you know, he'll make al-gebra mandatory, together with those al-gorisms!!

[-] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I took the initiative in inventing the internet

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And that Moo Slam al-jabr, also too!

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 2 days ago

At some point that joke has to be so old that everyone has heard it at least once... Right?

[-] chocosoldier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

imma tell you a secret, i still have no idea what taylor swift's music sounds like. justin bieber's either, for that matter. it's not that difficult to stay ignorant when you want to.

[-] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There was one song where they replaced her singing with a goat and it was 10/10 (not in a mean way, it was just perfect)

[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same. But those things are things you learn in primary school

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 30 points 2 days ago

When most people's attention span in below 30 seconds? No.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Yeah, who even posts this stuff?

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago
[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago

It's not an IQ test. IQ tests are supposed to quantify your ability to reason in a space in which you have no context. You have to have the context that Arabic numerals are the most common numbers in order to not fall for this. This is a critical thinking test (critical thinking requires both logic and a world view founded in reality)

... yes, I am autistic, why do you ask?

It's very well demonstrated that even child IQ tests are dependent on prior and culture specific knowledge. It's a significant problem with them tbh.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Supposed to and what they actually do are two different things, yes? But I agree. IQ tests are basically worthless anyways.

[-] sus@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

It hardly even needs to be demonstrated, most WAIS variants are explicitly designed to contain tests for "general information acquired from culture" and knowledge of vocabulary.

And yet here we are

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

it is, but the question is more like "someone has made a claim online that sounds scandalous! Do you a) immediately reply with your assumptions, or b) find sources and gather information about the claim before responding?"

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

You must be fun at parties, because I love having conversations like these. I usually learn a lot and I get to share my own similar esoteric interests. Epistemology is probably my favorite, but I love how it ties into Psychology.

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 days ago

I don't know if you intended your comment to be humorous, but I found it hilarious. The phrase "you must be fun at parties" instinctually caused me to be on edge, because it's so often said in an assholish, sarcastic way (especially online), but I was delighted to see that the rest of your comment thoroughly subverted that through nerdy earnestness. The contrast and the surprise was quite funny to me.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Thanks for taking the time to interpret and appreciate it. I put more time into those kinds of comments, and I'm glad it was coherent enough for my intent to be inferred.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yea that was great

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago

I have also loved epistemology ever since it was a required course in my high school curriculum.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I'm envious of that. I don't think it was ever more than touched on for me, well into an advanced degree. I only got into it by trying to define my own perspective on reality. I was looking for ontology, which led to metaphysics, but I kept getting distracted by all the things I couldn't know.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

TranscriptionA post on Threads, consisting first of text, and then of a screenshot of two Tweets, each a reply to the one after it.

By "georgehtakei":

This was an IQ test.

By "Catturd ™" @catturd2:

😂😂😂 we warned you.

By "Polymarket" @Polymarket:

BREAKING: Zohran Mamdani to require all New York elementary school students to learn Arabic numerals.

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Slight correction (and perhaps unimportant)Only George Takei's post was on Threads. He's sharing a screenshot of the other two, which are on Twitter. I don't want to link to Threads, but here's a screenshot in dark mode:

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Oh thanks! I was wondering why the first one didn't display a handle when the other two did.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Are you running a bot that does this? I was considering making one for instances to run, but was concerned that people might think "AI bad" about it.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Nope, just me, and just when I feel like it (often when I see a post I want to comment on anyway).

Ideally, OPs would do it on their own posts. Failing that, it'd be great if there were a bunch of people who could follow my lead and do it on a post or two per day. AI can be helpful, especially for OCR, but personally I wouldn't trust it to point out salient parts of the image in a relatively easy-to-read format.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't have, but Qwen3 VL (fairly new open model) has been doing a fantastic job of both describing and OCR in my local AI setup thus far.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Thanks! That was really nice of you.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

George Takei is paying for a checkmark over on that dumpster fire?

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

It looks like his post is on threads? Not that that's really better, but it is a different kind of bad.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Amazing that they look so similar to the untrained eye.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
532 points (97.8% liked)

Murdered by Words

2272 readers
29 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS