Someone over 65 or permanently disabled would have medicare, not medicaid. That sepparation allows all the boomers to support medicaid cuts and only fuck up other people's lives.
Medicare doesn’t really cover assisted living afaik, though Medicaid can cover parts of it. Old folks who run out of money can often become “dual eligible” for both programs. A quick search suggests that almost two thirds of people in long term care are reliant on Medicaid.
When you say "run out of money" you aren't kidding either, you need to be truly indigent for this to kick in. The system is designed to completely strip mine the elderly of all their assets.
Yeah, I had a relative with alzheimers who had to sell her house, and pretty much everything she owned, in order to be eligible for medicaid so she could afford the assisted living home. Pretty fucked.
I wouldn't do it. I'd buy one of those no background check guns you have and make sure my kids have something to inherit when I'm gone
Can confirm. I work in end of life healthcare.
My wife is 40, been fully and permanently disabled for years and gets both Medicare and Medicaid because of it. It's called a Dual Advantage plan out here I think?
This is mostly correct. Although, some people have dual eligibility.
Most of them rely on both
That'll last for a couple of months, maybe a year. And then the Republicans will come for medicaid too. If they get away with gutting Medicare, what makes you think they won't do the same to medicaid?
The Republicans will come for it and their base will vote for their own demise.
Or the severely physically and mentally impaired, people caring for spouses, parents, siblings and children with disabilities, people who work full time hourly jobs and still depend medicaid, etc... maybe think before opening your fucking mouth Kellyanne.
Seems like the patients should run for office, judging by our current representatives
That's pretty funny, but don't give them ideas. The average US Senator is 64. Gerontacracy is probably at least a symptom of the problem. There should be representation for a wide range of ages. We have lawmakers regulating the internet, that do not natively use it.
They could be president of the United States!
You joke, but as the median age increases, we will see more of this.
Is this what is known as Conway's Game of Life?
Kind of, except the cells just die.
Ah yes, but the emergent properties of such a game yields really interesting patterns, such as a couple of fat singular blobs self-sustaining themselves, albeit by a constant stream of dots that have no purpose other than to expire
The Russian Army is, apparently
Well, I guess that's one way to address shortfalls in pension funds.
I want to believe the best in people, but it seems so bad I find it unlikely things like this are an error or even negligence. Surely by this point, in a boardroom, at least one person in the decision-making process has asked, "Have we tried just letting them die?"
She's still alive?
Apparently:

Stolen logo?
Huh. I didn't notice. Now that I think about it, it does look like the GameCube logo.
Uhh... Walmart Greeter? 🤷♂️
Doesn’t Walmart train their employees on how to apply for SNAP benefits? I would imagine it’s not a huge leap to assume they don’t offer great health benefits too.

That would be a guaranteed code silver in about 5 minutes.
An active shooter? 🤨
Sorry, I meant "Silver Alert." I am laughing so hard at my mistake right now.
I guess it could be a code silver if they were restocking guns and ammo when struck by a flashback.
Old person fell down
Murdered by Words
Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.
The following things are not grounds for murder:
- Personal appearance ("You're fat", "You're ugly")
- Posts with little-to-no context
- Posts based on a grammar/spelling error
- Dick jokes, "Yo mama", "No, you" type responses and other low effort insults
- "Your values are bad" without any logcal or factual ways of showing that they are wrong ("I believe in capitalism" - "Well, then you must be evil" or "Fuck you you ignorant asshole")
Rules:
- Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
- Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
- No bigotry of any kind.
- Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
- If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
- Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.