103
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 weeks ago

Three years ago, as OpenAI's ChatGPT was making its splashy debut, a Pew Research center survey found that nearly one in five Americans saw AI as a benefit rather than a threat. But by 2025, 43 percent of U.S. adults now believe AI is more likely to harm them than help them in the future, according to Pew.

1 in 5 people seeing something as positive is not a high approval rating in the beginning.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I mean 4 out of 5 Americans probably held the opinion:

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

If you begin a large change management project in a company, having 20% of the employees think it's positive before you hardly start is like starting halfway to the finish line.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well yes, technology improvements that mean humans can work less are only a good thing if you have an economic system that actually prioritises general wellbeing over enriching a tiny percentage of the population.

Americans are the most fucked because the majority of the public view socialism and adjacent philosophy as being bad, despite really being the only ideologies with any real answers for what happens to people that can't work for a living, that isn't just them dying.

Tbh, 20% is markedly better than the default ~37% “shitgoblin vote” you see in the US, amongst other places

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

What began in 2022 as broad optimism about the power of generative AI to make peoples' lives easier has instead shifted toward a sense of deep cynicism that the technology being heralded as a game changer is, in fact, only changing the game for the richest technologists in Silicon Valley who are benefiting from what appears to be an almost endless supply of money to build their various AI projects — many of which don't appear to solve any actual problems.

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Gosh. Who could have foreseen this?

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

many of which don’t appear to solve any actual problems.

That's putting it lightly. If only the issue was merely not having sufficient use cases, rather than actively making lives worse through environmental strains, supply chain hoarding, and misinformation.

[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

What do you mean?? Elon has solved the critical problem of there not being a vaguely hot anime character in Grok users could talk to!

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Elon would be super pissed to hear you talk about his gf like that!

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

When I read this crap, all I can think is that yeah backlash is growing because the forced implementation is growing. Another useless sentiment-based article.

[-] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Lets use LLMs for things LLMs are useful for. It is not a panacea, and it is not appropriate for every use case

[-] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, LLMs are interesting tech products to play with and find some niche uses for.

But for the love of god they are not "prop up the entire stock market and numerous multi-trillion-dollar companies indefinitely" good!

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

What is it useful for? I actually have a hard time finding a use for it... Its alright at book recommendations, sometimes.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 3 weeks ago

I found it's useful for code where I know like 70% of what I'm doing. More than that and I can just do it myself. Less than that and I can't trust and diagnose the output.

I'd rather have old fashioned stack overflow and tutorials, honestly. It's hard to actually learn when it just gives answers.

[-] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I use it for coding advice sometimes, as an amateur hobbyist it's really useful to point me in the right direction when facing problems I'm unfamiliar with. I often end up reinventing the proverbial wheel, just worse, but LLMs can help point out standards and best practices that I, as an outsider to the industry, am unaware of.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 weeks ago

You have to be careful at low skill/knowledge levels, because it'll happily send you down a crazy path that looks legitimate.

I asked it how to do something in oracle SQL, because I don't know oracle specifically, and it gave me a terrible answer. I suspected it wasn't right so I asked a coworker who's an old hand at Oracle, and he was like "no that's terrible. Here's a much simpler way"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Movie recommendations is my biggest thing, personally.

And lots of other purposes. Just because a ton of people are misusing this tool and treating it like GAI doesn't mean that it isn't a useful tool. Even something as simple as proofreading a letter has massive utility for some people.

[-] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Definitely proof reading. Especially for people who can barely write intelligibly. They can check themselves if the meaning is still correct and they will learn grammar from the process.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

I just got the notification today when opening Office programs that copilot was there

all the help threads about how to turn it off have out of date info. seems like you can no longer disable it in Excel/Word/PowerPoint

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You can disable it with the uninstall function.

Microsoft Works 2000 still works fine.

[-] FourThirteen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This comment is fantastically chaotic and I love it so much.

RIP Microsoft Works, what a legend.

[-] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The disabling process is kinda convoluted.

  1. Delete word
  2. Install libre office
  3. ???
  4. Profit!
[-] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is one reason I'm so glad we devs can install linux at work. I have LibreOffice installed sure, but if I need to use the Microsoft Office suite for some reason, it all works great as webpages in librewolf!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

The crazy thing is, none of these articles seem to want to admit that AI is bad. They keep making articles like this. Keep saying that approval is falling among the general populace. But when touching on why that is, there's always some wiggle words. Always some spin.

It's never "people being forced to use it are seeing it as a detriment to them" people using it are seeing a decrease in efficacy of the results it gives for the amount of prompting required. Or people don't like it because it's going to have significant detrimental affects on the environment and their utilities.

All of those are solid reasons for the decline in both the use of AI LLM'S and the approval of them.

The cost of goods and services relating even tangentially to AI are going through the roof. The amount of slop is increasing at a furious pace, directly contributing to things like enshittification and dead Internet theory. The effect on the economy is looking to be extremely catastrophic.

But oh no. It's lack of authenticity on social media spaces that people are worried about. Sure.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

The crazy thing is, none of these articles seem to want to admit that AI is bad.

As the old quote goes- "A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, "You are mad, you are not like us.""

In such an environment, nobody wants to admit they are not mad, lest they be attacked.

Or as someone else said- I want a future where machines cook and clean and do menial work, so us humans can focus on art and poetry and writing. Instead we have a world where machines create art and poetry and books, so the humans can focus on cleaning and menial work. I don't like this timeline.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Also, "AI could be used to to replace my job. Not that it'd do a good job at it, but it'd be a great excuse to lay me off."

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The orgs publishing this junk are pushing the writers to use AI. So the writers and editors can't shit talk AI because their boss will get upset.

[-] brotato@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It’s good to see the sentiment growing. Anecdotally, there are non-technical people in my circle that use LLMs frequently as search engine replacements or to do stupid shit like generate pictures and emojis. I hope that begins to decline with the general sentiment called out in this article.

The sheer number of useless LLM integrations in every website, every mobile app, and hell, even smart TVs is insane. I feel like it’s causing people very real feature fatigue. And all of the Internet content and advertising slop is making the takeover seem so much worse.

Edit: Grammar, formatting

[-] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

I react with either neutral apathy, disgust or surprise when somebody tries to show me their latest AI generated blob. Repeat twice and they stop using it. Our fear of social embarassment is higher than our desire to use AI.

"Look at this picture of me in a Ghibli style I generated"

"Oh... It's kinda bad isn't it? I'd avoid sharing it"

"Oh remember what we were debating earlier? Gemini said that..."

"Oh I know what you're going to say, it said something totally dumb, right? I know, one must be very stupid to trust it haha so anyway what were you saying?"

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

It likely doesn't help that the kids use "AI" as slang for "bullshit".

[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I have so much admiration for the younger generation for this. Language is powerful and they know it.

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Tim Walz knew it, too, with weird. Then the DNC told them to stop saying it to try and court Republicans. I'm so over winning, thanks DNC!

[-] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Slop is terrible obviously, but at least in exchange for the slop we get… higher energy costs and acceleration of climate change

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry, what part of "Let the Broligarchy do anything it wants!" didn't y'all understand? /s

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
103 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

78626 readers
577 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS