102
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The House speaker doesn’t want Republicans to be around when the deadline comes.

House Speaker Mike Johnson is conveniently sending Congress home the day before the Justice Department is supposed to release the Epstein files in full. The announcement came Wednesday night.

This looks like yet another instance of Johnson doing every little thing he can either to delay the release of the files or to make it so that his fellow GOPers don't have to be in town to answer to their complicity in this monthslong campaign to avoid their release---as he did by egregiously delaying the swearing-in of Democratic Representative Adelita Grijalva for weeks.

"Like I said: view all political developments for the rest of the week in light of the fact that the Epstein Files are supposed to be released on Friday," Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote Wednesday evening on X. "House Republicans just suddenly canceled Congressional session Friday and are sending everyone home Thursday evening."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

This guy is a one-trick pony.

Have to oath in a Democrat who will trigger a vote his master doesn't like? Send everyone home!

Files that incriminates his master are being released? Send everyone home!

This tactic is getting old already.

[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I see it as them showing their hand. They know they cant take the heat, so they run. Pussies.

[-] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago

Hey now, pussies can take a pounding and keep on coming.

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 9 points 3 months ago

They also have depth and warmth that most if not all republicans lack.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Republicans complain that government is ineffective and corrupt, then they get elected and prove it.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Members of your own party trying to force a vote to extend Obamacare subsidies? Send 'em home!

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

What does Mike Johnson know how to do besides not doing things?

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Well the GOP loves to say that government doesn't work, and surprise surprise when they're in charge it's the one thing they're right about.

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's more than that even, they're usually the reason why the government doesn't work.

Social security would work great if funded properly, so what do they do? Screw with the funding. The ACA would work if properly funded, so what do they do? Let the subsidies expire. Medicare for all would work if properly funded. The education system would work if properly funded. The VA works when properly funded. And so on, and so on, and so on. In most cases, all it takes is the money and resources that they'd rather steal or give to their donors and like magic, we'd have a functioning government again.

They constantly sabotage programs that benefit tax payers while spinning the lie that government run programs can't and don't work. And after decades of dealing with underfunded programs run with minimal staffing and a maximum of red tape, of course people believe them.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That's my point though. If someone's stated position is that a thing doesn't work, putting them in charge of the thing is pretty much assured to make that thing not work.

[-] stupe@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

The files probably incriminate him too.

[-] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

He admitted he needs his teenage son to monitor his porn habits. Imagine what he doesn't admit to.

[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago
[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

The guy that shares details around jerking off with his son. Totally normal.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I wish I got so many days off...

[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 4 points 3 months ago

It’s easy when special interests are paying you for NOT working. Sweet gig.

[-] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No shit! Same… add to that the best healthcare, transportation, and a personal assistant.

[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Pension too if you can last long enough

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Pension for them is like 5 years or something absurd like that.

A pension is available to members 62 years of age with 5 years of service; 50 years or older with 20 years of service; or 25 years of service at any age. A reduced pension is available depending upon which of several different age/service options is chosen. If Members leave Congress before reaching retirement age, they may leave their contributions behind and receive a deferred pension later.[1]

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's actually a pretty standard public service pension schedule.

Mine had me vesting in 5 years, but the contributions at that point aren't high enough to mean much. It just means that if if I didn't make it 5 years the city wouldn't contribute to my retirement ( I put in 7 and the coty double-matches, so I get 21%). When I hit 5 years, I retroactively got the 14% from the city for my previous 5 years added to my pension. If I had quit before the 5 years, I'd have been given my 7% back as a cash payment after 5 years away from public service.

But I can't collect until I reach retirement age or have 20 years of service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

Are we gonna see the naughty list soon?

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

He's making his list, redacting it twice, you'll never find out who's naughty or nice.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They're checking it twice.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

I was promised all the epstein files today. Who do I call and complain to?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We got them, hundreds of pages blacked out completely redacted. It is absolutely ridiculous

Edit: for those who are curious.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf

[-] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

This has to be a joke, right? But the .gov domains are reserved in us for actual government agencies, right? So what the fuck

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am sure they have some good "rationale" for redacting what looks to be a significant portion of grand jury testimony. Of course the administration did say they would release them, but probably back tracked or they are "protecting" the victims.

I personally think it is bullshit. They are handling it like top secret stuff. The President clearly has the authority to release this considering his current MO. It is a giant middle finger to the public.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

The epstein files are inevitable at this point and republicans are already getting marching orders for how to do damage control.

Mad props to AOC and I get why she wants to keep that in the cultural zeitgeist ahead of... tomorrow. But this is very much about house republicans breaking with johnson/doing token "See, I am one of the good ones" votes to override him on obamacare extensions and preventing trump from bombing Venezuela to distract from the epstein files.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Dems should release more pics right when they come back.

[-] finley@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

lol. I love it. Keep a reserve of photos and keep trickling them out when the new cycle dies down.

[-] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Wait, there's a person named Noam Chomsky?

I've heard the name said on the news before but was never listening.

Isn't that the name of the gnome in the carnival campaign of Left 4 Dead 2?

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, the person was named after the gnome.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Common misconception, the person was named after Nim Chimpsky, the famous chimpanzee from the Columbia a University ASL study.

[-] Feedback17@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Are there any conservatives out there that can tell us why you worship a pedophile?

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Because he's a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitch.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He sent everyone home because of the discharge petition for ACA. Epstein was coming anyway, this is about ripping healthcare away from millions. Which in Mike's own words....."It's only 7% of the country"

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 3 months ago

I guess it's the land of the free after all if you can fuck a bunch of children and still be president

[-] sfgifz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Beacon of conservative Christian values

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aarch0x40@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

It may also effectively kill the discharge petition for the 3-year extension of ACA subsidies vote.

[-] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

at this point, we need to form an alternative socialist government of the united states as a micronation. seriously!

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Wow, I don't know about you guys, but I've come to the end of my attention span. I guess there was never anything to see there after all, right?

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

This is illegal.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

This is fascism. They'll always win.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fascism wins until good men go to war. Then they fold

[-] hogmomma@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If by "fold" you mean "beaten into submission," then, yeah, I'd have to agree with you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
102 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28974 readers
430 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS