277
The judge literally ordered that political consequences were not an excuse for redactions. I hope he starts putting people in jail
He will do nothing! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! The judges in the Untied States are like the parents who say they're going to count to three, and the Trump administration are the kids who have figured out that nothing happens when they get to three.
At the end of the day, the folks who actually enforce rulings are beholden to Trump and his cronies, so they kind of can’t enforce shit
If only there were a way to separate the judicial and executive branch.. why didn't the founding fathers think of that?!
That would be a first. I'm not holding my breath.
What's this, another court order shamelessly ignored? Fourth box.
They were also supposed to release all the files and not some of them, yet here we are.
Politically exposed individuals.
Here's the question, why are they in the files doing something that merits redacting them?
Call it what it is. You aren't "redacting the names of politically exposed individuals". You are "protecting the reputations of politically-aligned pedophiles".
It's even exactly the opposite of what the term says.
Keeping the those politicians secret means they remain politically exposed to extortion by any person or government that knows that secret, to the detriment of US national security. Revealing those secrets eliminates any leverage for bad actors.
Revealing that secret means the people can't be extorted anymore. There's a narrow window when they can speak freely before....
Well....do you remember The Red Wedding episode of Game of Thrones? Sort of like that, but defenestrations.
Did anyone really expect them to release documents that implicated republicans or their puppeteers? These assholes are blatantly corrupt. As long as they are the gatekeepers, nothing can be trusted.
Republicans are amoral and shamelessly corrupt, and, in related news, the sky is blue, and grass is green.
Also, water is wet... that is breaking news.
They were never, ever going to release the files with Trump in them or anyone Trump adjacent.
At least we know without a shadow of a doubt the dumb pedophile rapist piece of shit is unmistakably in those files... this completely seals the deal. Legally nothing will be done but, yeah.. the childfucking piece of shit is DEFINITELY in those files. For sure. No doubt. Undoubtedly. No contest. The President of the United States of America is a disgusting pedophile rapist piece of shit.
Just look at him... ugh! [shudder]
This is bullshit.
Wait, that's illegal
Add it the pile.
Surprising no one.
is the DOJ acting on the names they've redacted? like, are these people going to jail?
I think I love Trump and his government purely because they are so blatant at corruption, they expose all of those before them and will surely make everyone question those that follow.
If not.. Then I guess that's it.
If there is an option for Americans to disrupt the republican - democrat party swap, then please, please disrupt the hell out of it in the next election.
This is a big surprise. I'm sure it was a mistake and they meant to redact something damaging in a different document.
/s
I feel shocked.
Shocked?
Shocked!
Well, not THAT shocked..
This is such a crazy timeline. Everyone knows our president is an ephebophile (pedo into teens). He has flat out stated it. No one is unaware of this fact anymore.
And yet we live in a system where good people are being deported or tortured in prison camps. We can't have government that actually works because our laws are so fucked up that good people get hurt while we all know a pedo rapist is running the country.
It's time we realize as a species that this world is ran by pure evil. We need to begin responding differently. I don't know what that means, but even after a revolution there are still charismatic psychos that come along and fuck shit up again. People are just too dumb and fall for it over and over and over. How many times does this process need to be repeated before we evolve as a species?
It is that damn moral highground the left wants to stick to. They will shoot themselves in the foot over and over and while bleeding out ask "what could we have done?"
There no longer is a slippery slope. Outlaw the shit republicans do and lock them the hell up. Cuz you know what, they are tryinging their hardest to do the same.
Obviously that is the correct step in the interim. But how do we prevent this repeating over and over?
honestly i don't know if humans can.
when you look at stories of (semi)utopian societies there is this drive in nearly all people to be good to a fault. people want to work and learn and do things for the betterment of society. real humans will find a way to be shitty no matter how good they are.
i think the only way to get things to work is to define a good but rigid stance on all thing shitty. shame the fuck out of stupid religous and political views. anti science and anti facts should cause your voice to be silenced. this wave of stupidity and hate needs to be treated like cancer.
He is into 13 year olds. 13 year olds are not 'teens'. Yes, I know how 13 is pronounced. He's still a pedo.
Republican child rapists
Motherfucker Trump. He’s so obviously implicated and covering. The very thing all those Magat’s claim to fight against: he’s that.
No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.
Except for Bill Clinton?
Headline meant republicans
Gotta redact appropriately:
No they didn’t. They redacted the names of Trump, his allies, and people who bribed him.
The media needs to say what’s actually going on, not just feed us bullshit Trump says.
Ain't no-one more politically exposed than one Donald J Trump.
So, probably, and as far as we know,
Ain't no-one more redacted in the Epstein Files than that Donald J Trump.
I'd put the word president in front of his surname, but he's not worthy of the honour, and he's not worthy of the presidency.
I didn't think there was anyone in the world who could make George W Bush look statesmanlike, well-informed, wise, responsible and honest. I was wrong.
People in politics SHPULD BE FUCKING EXPOSED because it's about GOVT POLICY that affects EVERYONE. NOBODY IN POLITICS SHOULD BE HIDDEN.
And what are you going to do about it? Until bullets start flying in large numbers nothing will change.
Brb
this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
277 points (99.6% liked)
politics
28878 readers
592 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS