95
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago

Our product ships with a dick smashing hammer, but you can disable it if you want

[-] onwardknave@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

We just want to make sure we're smashing the right dicks.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Once every update the product might decide on a whim to smash it's dick again.

[-] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's really funny seeing people more mad about the opt-out, than when they added AI stuff months ago.

Some of it is actually pretty useful, like the local on-device translation is part of their AI initiative. I don't want to have to depend on Google or other remote servers for translation. I honestly didn't notice any of the other AI features until people started putting articles complaining about it out.

[-] drhead@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

honestly, the thing that annoys me most about this discourse is that nobody seems to be talking about what these AI features are. As in, I have seen several threads on this and your comment is the first that actually mentioned what they're specifically doing. Like, everyone just saw "we're adding AI stuff" and stopped thinking there... which just means people don't even know what they're complaining about.

[-] kleeon@hexbear.net 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"AI kill switch" already exists. It's called "delete firefox"

[-] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago
[-] kleeon@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

sure why not

[-] SickSemper@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago

I just got on Firefox because I thought it was better than chrome maddened

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Been using Zen for about a year and it's very nice except when I accidentally hit the clear button and lost all my tabs I was probably never going to look at again anyways.

https://zen-browser.app/

[-] S4ck@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

I switched from Firefox because I started to have lots of issues with video playback. My gut tells me that it's google fucking with the competition because every other browser is fine but uses chromium and has tracking.

Anyone else experience anything like that?

[-] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Yes I often find that videos don’t play well if I skip backwards. The audio will play but the image gets stuck on the place I was before skipping back

[-] meler@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

I don't know if you've figured this trick out or not but for me if I go slightly before where I want to go in the video and then hit the right arrow key to skip forward a tiny bit it resets the bug

[-] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 2 points 17 hours ago

I will try this thanks

[-] Edie@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah it has usually taken a few seconds to start playback in youtube whenever I open them in Firefox, whereas in Chromium it's instantaneous.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago

Assuming you trust them that it actually does that, and assuming they don't just push an update that turns it back on later silently

[-] theturtlemoves@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

It's open-source. You don't have to trust them.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 33 points 1 day ago

I do, because I can't go read the code and understand it. So I have to trust someone, if not them

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not reading all of that. I know already that they are putting stuff that I don't want into Firefox. They've told me.

An opt-out switch is not enough.

Mozilla has a history of being unhappy and insisting on their trademark when distros disable unwelcome features.

[-] MizuTama@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Always funny seeing people say that for open-source stuff.

[-] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago

Lol they've clearly been getting some push back on the Ai thing, huh?

[-] doubledealer@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Consider https://www.waterfox.com/ as an alternative. Anyone who wants a fair and free internet is probably still fucked in the mid-term unless a new FOSS engine falls out of the sky or a bunch of Mozilla devs jump ship with a hard fork because Waterfox is still downstream of Mozilla, using their engine, and reliant on them maintaining code. But Waterfox is not a bad option at present in a sea of terrible options, and it's what I've switched to.

https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/

Waterfox exists because some users want a browser that simply works well at being a browser. The UI is mature - arguably, it has been a solved for problem for years. The customisation features are available and apparent. The focus is on performance and web standards.

In many ways, browsers are operating systems of their own, and a browser’s job is to be a good steward of that environment. AI, in its current form and in my opinion does not match that responsibility.

And yes, yes - disabling features is all well and good, but at the end of the day, if these AI features are black boxes, how are we to keep track of what they actually do? The core browsing experience should be one that fully puts the user in control, not one where you’re constantly monitoring an inscrutable system that claims to be helping you.

Waterfox will not include LLMs. Full stop. At least and most definitely not in their current form or for the foreseeable future.

[-] RION@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

Would be interesting if this is how Waterfox really differentiates itself. From what I understand there's been no real reason to use it over something like Librewolf or Arkenfox. Fond memories of using it for 64bit support in the early 2010s though

[-] doubledealer@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

There was some initial confusion about Librewolf's stance on AI, at the same time Mozilla Foundation CEO was putting his revolver into one of his orifices, that has since been cleared up: https://chaos.social/@librewolf/115716906957137196

With their clarification on why AI slop was enabled in Librewolf, I'd only caution anyone against Librewolf because they are a hardcore privacy solution for the most conservative risk tolerance. If it doesn't break your browsing or screw with your flow, then it's also a good consideration.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

"AI Kill Switch" is the most tech CEO shit ever lol

[-] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

what are some good alternatives to Firefox in case this kill switch isn't 100% thorough?

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

I've enjoyed using Zen browser lately

[-] stephen@lazysoci.al 11 points 1 day ago

I’m still working with Firefox based browsers. Mullvad’s is where I’m at right now. Librewolf is my backup.

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Second Zen, appreciate the tabs bar on the side after I got used to it.

[-] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

There's forks of Firefox like Waterfox or Librefox. There's also User.js generators.

I wouldn't trust Chrome or any Chrome forks, it's not like Chrome or Edge are any better in terms of AI.

[-] RondoRevolution@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Zen and Floorp are good. I personally use Zen, but have Floorp setup with sideberry in case I need to use another browser for some reason.

[-] doleo@lemmy.one 18 points 1 day ago

This shit, and no gecko firefox for ios, is why I dont want a supposed non-profit to have a CEO.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Isn't this Apple's fault though?

[-] doleo@lemmy.one 5 points 1 day ago

Partially, yes. But in the EU, now Japan, and somewhere else (I think?), apple don't get a say in it. It's being worked on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882872, but obviously AI takes priority over, ultimately, adblocker extensions on ios firefox.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

One might say it takes priority over building a web browser

[-] avoid_the_noid@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anybody used other browsers like NetSurf/w3m/LadyBird/Dillo?

Curious if anybody had any thoughts on them here that is more knowledgeable than me.

[-] avoid_the_noid@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

Update: using w3m, this shit is for nerds lol but it's cool, makes me feel like some kind of 1990's hacker. Super impractical though unless you're only visiting text based sites.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

i'll have you know w3m can display images. in the terminal.

[-] Edie@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah... I really want something in-between w3m/etc. and Firefox, something that can display hexbear and isn't running one of the three browser engines.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

brow.sh is what you're looking for

[-] Edie@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Browsh uses a headless version of Mozilla Firefox to fetch and parse web pages

Doesn't seem so.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago
[-] Edie@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Very interesting. But it doesn't display hexbear decently (I'm not gonna require it to be "correct," but I do want it to be decent—vibes based measurement)


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

hexbear probably uses a ton of modern features, so yeah. maybe lemmy should have a lynx-compatible mode.

[-] RondoRevolution@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Or maybe they could you know, just not ship this shit. But who am I kidding, the corporation IS GONNA SHIP IT and YOU WILL LIKE IT. porky-happy

[-] Runcible@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

I'm assuming the AI focus is what caused them to pull the "we won't track you harvest your data" statement from the terms of use. I had thought that would push anyone who cared enough to not use one of the bigger browsers to a firefox off shoot but I guess there's still more people to alienate

tough shit, too late, already uninstalled

[-] lib1@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Time for Waterfox I guess

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Is this about the clown on Mastodon where I'm still not completely sure it's even a real Mozilla account? Who couldn't guarantee that stuff that is switched off stays switched off?

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24136 readers
225 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS