34
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by RedWizard@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net

previous analysisThe comments on this clip are indicative of the two lenses I think people view this show from:

Yeah. That much is true. They actually have gone to such extreme with Carol it’s almost like love-bombing. Which probably triggers her trauma from Camp Freedom Falls.

I think the Plurbs/Hive mean well. But they clearly don’t know when it’s gone too much and too far so quickly.

Followed by:

they know everything. It’s a systematic and gradual manipulation process to eventually get carol’s approval for her stem cell and turn her into them, just like they’re doing with that Casanova. They’re sole purpose is to join every single person on the planet and build an antenna the size of Africa to send out these RNA codes into space and then their mission will be over. It’s obvious the hive won’t sustain forever because if eventual calorie deficits and they’ll all die. It’s very apocalyptic and dystopic

The show makes a number of things clear this episode:

  • The hive does not share sensory data. Meaning, they do not feel what everyone feels all at once.
  • The hive is aware of the goings-on with every other individual in the hive, but in a passive way. Their connection is described as Subconscious.
  • Their biological imperative includes resending that signal. While we'll likely never know what is happening on the source planet, it's safe to say it can't be dissimilar to what is playing out on the show.
  • The hive is starved for novelty. It would appear that, without the interactions with the unjoined, they would simply proceed with the task at hand (resending the signal). They tell Carol, "We're excited to read something new!"
  • The last point seems to imply that they are not capable of producing novelty themselves. This is likely because of the shared, passive, collective experiences. Carol (and the other unjoined) are a black box to the hive, and thus can create novelty.
  • The game that Carol and the hive play is interesting, in that it is not a game of strategy, but a game of reflex. Strategy is something a hive would excel at, but reflex is something relative to the individual.
  • The episode establishes that they do not share any kind of "muscle memory" but still retain all the knowledge and understanding of elite players of physical sports.
  • Carol insists on treating Zosia as an individual, which the show then illustrates is a difficult task for the joined Zosia to perform.
  • When Carol asks Zosia what her favorite food is, she recalls a memory of Zosia as a child. As she tells the story, it's clear that Zosia (or the hive) is enjoying this memory, Zosia recalls it fondly, and thanks Carol for asking. The scene seems to imply that without Carol's question, there would be no reason to recall this memory. It's as if Zosia is recalling something that was almost forgotten, it creates in her, the individual, a feeling of nostalgia, something we haven't seen the hive do before. (I think)
  • This brings me back to the massage scene. Zosia says that the others can not feel how good the massage is, but admits that it feels very good. This is an experience that no one else has, emotionally. The hive understand the experience intellectually and can recall how it felt to the individual at the time, but only Zosia was able to experience the emotional feeling associated with the massage.

If I had to make a guess as to where this is leading, it is that people can be reconditioned into their individuality. That Carols dogged insistence on treating people as individuals could result in them rediscovering themselves in some way. The implication that there is a drought of novelty among the hive is obviously a dig at collectivism, but I think that dig falls short because of the rules and conditions set by the show. Under true collectivism, you are still a disconnected black box among many black boxes, only that you share the same collective value set that they do. Novelty would still exist, since novelty is born out of new experiences. There is also a novelty associated with providing those new experiences. When you introduce someone to something you've seen before, you're doing it to give them that same feeling you had the first time you experienced that thing as well. That act of giving is, itself, novel, and creates a kind of cycle of novelty. The hive in the show can not have new experiences. Not because it has experienced everything, but because once someone experiences something, it is instantly dispersed across the hive and intellectualized, and no other individual will ever experience the associated emotions again. Even though they share everything, the one thing they can't share together, is the act of experiencing emotions together, or sharing emotional moments together.

This, I think, is why the hive loves the individuals so much. Sure, their biological imperative also drives them to assimilate the individuals, but if they are successful in doing so, novelty will be gone forever. They will become alone, and isolated. In that way, the show is also about connection. The hive is literally connected, but they lack the ability to make real connections because, as a collective, they are in unity. They experience the world from many perspectives, but they are a collective individual. They express socially as an individual creature. Because of that unity, the individual people who suffer and die every day are simply the flaking off of skin cells to this organism. It is like plucking a hair. One gone, another grows back. It's interesting that they mention that people die, but that people are also born in this episode. They do not spend any time on it, however. They do not make a point to even react to the idea that new babies are being born every day. Obviously that's the case, but neither of the characters dwell on that fact for even a second.

The idea that children are being born into this situation creates a lot of questions. Is the baby joined at birth? Is there a period of development where the baby is not joined? It also implies that there isn't simply a lost of novelty, but also a loss of innocence as well. The show establishes this in an earlier episode where Carol asks a joined child what kind of gynecologicals tool he would prefer, and other technical questions about gynecology. This child isn't innocent anymore, they are filled with every experience every living person ever experienced. Innocence and novelty are a linked pair, your Innocence is born out of a lack of experience, and as you have more experiences you are hit with feelings of novelty. As a child, you are flooded with novelty all the time, and it defines your whole existence. There is even a concept of time dilation related to novelty. That the feeling you have when you are young, where the days feel like they last forever, where the months feel like years, where every moment you're awake feels like it drags on forever. This is because your brain is constantly taking new and novel things. As you age, that feeling of long days and even longer months fades, and weeks and days blend together as the number of novel experiences you have every day dries up like a puddle in a desert.

To me, the notion of losing novelty is compelling. I think people might even be seeing attacks on collectivism that might not actually be there. In fact, the show goes out of its way to make positive light of the collective behavior. In the episode, Carol asks where they sleep, and discovers they all sleep together in all the large empty spaces. They describe it as efficient, but Carol seems to view it differently, that it's kind of "nice". When she asks the hive where Zosia lives, it replies, "We do not have a home. All ideas about private property are gone. In a way, wherever we hang our hat is our home", which is a kind of romantic way of describing what the total abolition of private property might be like. When Carol is seeing how they sleep, there is a detail in the background that stood out to me, which is that there was an elderly person among them. One of the people from the collective throughout the scene made sure that person was able to get to their sleeping spot. It took them much longer than anyone else. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. That principle appears to play out in the show. From large scale endeavors like running a hospital, to the small gestures, like aiding an elderly person to their bed so they can sleep. Every person on earth with any kind of physical need like that is cared for in the same way, and the nearest able bodies person helps them without question.

So it's interesting to me that there are people who watch this show and see it as "apocalyptic and dystopic" because it's very clear that it's also very utopian and optimistic.

So, I'm going to follow up the above after seeing this last episode. I'll say this, I'm not super stoked with whatever direction this seems to be going in. Carol is still the most unlikable character in this show, and this is a show with basically 3 characters at this point. So, we now seem to understand that the hive has been effectively stalling while Carol takes yet another self-indulgent episode. Except, this time, she does so with the hive, and seems to have convinced herself that she can out manipulate the hive. Clearly, Carol is a deeply unwell person, whose vices extend all the way to using others for her own gratification.

It's interesting to me reading the discourse about this show, as noted above. I don't believe this show has much of an "ideology" and many of us may simply be seeing our own shadows here. I'm not convinced that the Breaking Bad guy has it in him to intentionally write anti-communist slop, and I'm not convinced he has it in him to write pro-communist slop either. I think what we're seeing here is liberalism manifest. Taking the basic anti-communist worldview, baked into the brains of all western liberals, and attempting to design a world around what "the abolition of private property, from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs" with a sci-fi candy coating. So for me, that stuff people are picking out isn't interesting, because it's just a manifestation of some liberal's basic, cursory understanding of ideology. The passive expression of the liberal hegemonic world view.

The opening portion of this episode is probably the most interesting part of the episode for me. It aligns with what I've said previously. Once there is no one left to interact with, there is only silence. In fact, there isn't even culture anymore. These indigenous people abandon their native lands the second the last of them is assimilated. To me, this could read as deliberate, and I think it could be. However, it's just as likely that it's accidental, the playing out of previously established information to show the viewers how close the hive is to assimilating the others. Could this be some kind of subtle commentary about what collectivism does to culture? Are the writers telling us that under communism, all unique cultural touchstones would be vaporized? That would make this show even more of a cartoonishly anti-communist show then we could have previously realized!

I'm just not sure if that's the case. There were far more interesting things happening in the previous episode, and this episode feels like it was supposed to be even MORE interesting, and it simply wasn't. This thread being established about disrupting the connection between the hive is simply not as interesting as discovering the limitations and borders of what the hive is capable of, and what makes it tick. The end of the episode feels like a "We're finally getting the team together" moment, a classic trope. To me, the show is more interesting as a new order that needs to be accepted, that comes with problems that need to be solved. It's more interesting to explore WHY the hive can't even pick fruit, and eventually attempting to solve that problem. The idea that this is the cliffhanger we're left on does not give me a lot of confidence that this show can keep it up for 3 more seasons.

All I can really hope for is that these efforts backfire in a fascinating way that feels fully earned. Right now, nothing really feels earned at all. I'm not really rooting for anyone in this show at this point, except for the hive. If the hive can get its shit together, get off this "communism when no pick apples" plot device, do more exploration about the true loss at hand, the loss of novelty, of innocence, of shared experiences, shared emotion, of creativity and spontaneity, of personal history, culture and ultimately identity, then I might be more interested in this show.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Could this be some kind of subtle commentary about what collectivism does to culture? Are the writers telling us that under communism, all unique cultural touchstones would be vaporized? That would make this show even more of a cartoonishly anti-communist show then we could have previously realized!

there's something that's been missing from the show where we don't see what the plurb are up to on the daily when they're not interacting with individuals. Yeah some are making soylent green, and some are working on Carol's stem cells, but there's entire countries of people doing some other shit and we're never shown any of that. Without knowing what they left the village to do, there's minimal ground to read tea leaves about what it's supposed to mean that they left.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Sure, but the choices made here matter. It could have been a white suburb, but instead it was indigenous peoples. They sang their cultures songs right up until she was joined and then it ended. Why would these people be shown to us, why did they make these characters indigenous? Everything you see was a choice made by the director, writers, and show runners. Sometimes things are just things. I'm not sure this is the case here.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

until the national origin of anyone besides Carol matters for any reason i'm just taking the other individuals as liberal diversity checklisting.

i can't wait for ten years from now when season 3 comes out and we find out what the show is trying to say about the human condition

[-] Gorillatactics@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

My hope (pitch?) for the 2nd season; keeping in mind that its a character study first, a lesbian romance 3rd and a scifi mystery maybe 5th: Carol and Manousos figure out a way to disconnect bodies from the hive. Instead of being liberated the reborn persons experience it as a great loss, they did really experience the hive as love. The disconnection will be used as a metaphor for grief, solitude and divorce (bound to be someone in the writers room with experience). They want to rejoin the hive but the trauma of the disconnection will cause the hive to have seizures. Only increasing the feelings of loss and isolution of the reborn. Some of the reborn will blame Carol and Many and try to kill them, this I imagine would be the bulk of the overarching plot. Others, knowing the hive cant sustain itself caloricly start farming to provide for their former lover. Zosia would go to Carol hoping her affection can fill some of the void left by the absence of the hive, Carol will realize but will be too lonely to leave her, that tension will be the main plot.

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

yeah i want some or all of any disconnected people to not be happy about it

[-] hollowmines@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

Not really inclined to run ideology_scan.exe just yet when we're like 1/5 of the way through in all likelihood. Also, newsflash: the vast majority of TV writers are libs...expect a muddle at best.

It's more interesting to me as a character-driven drama, and also to take in the range of reactiions to those characters. I like that Carol is flawed, contradictory and hypocritical, but believably so (esp in the face of brain-melting circumstances). I find a lot of the reactions to her behaviour baffling.

Also love the long stretches of dialogue-free visual storytelling.

[-] nasezero@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's so fucking funny watching Vince Gilligan interviews - the man is nothing but humble (almost annoyingly so) and just repeatedly emphasizes the contributions of the cast and his fellow writers - and then opening Hexbear threads where all the critics of his show are calling him a self-indulgent, anti-communist hack (who also personally shit in their breakfast cereal this morning).

Also, people saying this show is boring or "filler" is wild to me. I can only assume that the Netflixication of shows (I'm looking at you, Stranger Things) where the characters repeatedly openly verbalize exposition about their characterization and the current plot status must have fried people's brains. Those "filler" scenes are packed full of non-verbal communication and symbols to unpack and analyze; it's one thing to find them uninteresting (to each their own) but to call them "filler" and saying "nothing happens" is objectively wrong shrug-outta-hecks

Example of a boring filler scene where nothing happens because this show SUCKS and Bince is a BIG MEANIETake the sequence of Manousos showing up in Carol's cul-de-sac. Here is a man who has been through hell crossing continents, practicing his English all along the way so that he can announce that he is there to help her save the world. Then he finally meets Carol, and their personalities immediately clash and devolve into petty fighting. I've heard it described as "the real last person on Earth meets Carol" and every minute of it is chefs-kiss (I'm honestly surprised Carol haters didn't love this episode, Manousos could easily be read as an "actually has and lives by his principles" foil to Carol, who had given up and started indulging similar to Diabaté. And then once she discovers the Plurbs are using her eggs to engineer a way to infect her, she returns to Manousos recommitted to his efforts, this time with a nuke literally to maintain her invidual sovereignty against the Plurbs! juche-boi)

Anyways, after Carol storms off, Manousos similarly storms off to grab his machete only for us to get a drawn-out scene of Manousos on his knees, cursing his circumstances while fishing out a cellphone from out of the storm drain he tossed it into earlier. The payoff of the machete is that he uses it to grab the phone by its magnetic back. And it's fucking hilarious! And it drives the plot forward, because we're getting character development from literally-the-most-stubborn-man-alive possibly showing a crack in his resolve by retrieving Carol's phone so he can resume communicating with her. It's okay that it's a "simple"/"boring" scene, it works because there's so much non-verbal communication happening throughout the episode, there's still so much to think about and analyze even if it's not straightforward dialogue being expositioned into our brains with a firehose.

[-] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Example of a boring filler scene where nothing happens because this show SUCKS and Bince is a BIG MEANIE

I don't think you'd find anyone saying that that was a filler scene. The manousos episode where 20 minutes of it was driving was filler. Very pretty with some characterisation of his stubbornness etc, but that had mostly been established.

[-] larrikin99@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

The show is dull as hell and nothing but filler. I'll write my own thoughts about the show at length eventually, and since pluribus fans love watching drawn out sequences of a miserable asshole whine and waste time, they'll have no excuse for not reading it.

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think the combination of the fact that the hive mind thing is such a common crutch for sci fi writers who have written themselves into a corner and the fact that the notion is so antithetical to our actual experiences as individuals makes it hard to interpret the inconsistencies or contradictions in how the plurb works as something other than failures in the central premise. Any irrationality can be chalked up to the virus reprogramming people to be a certain way so it's not really an exploration of group consciousness so much as an exploration of a virus pulling a cordyceps and getting humanity to climb up a giant grass blade and dangle there spreading spores and accomplishing that by networking everyone's brains together. And it's not like that can't make for a good story[^1], but trying to pull lessons or allegories may not work, because that premise doesn't really map to anything.

[^1]: See, e.g. the Ancillary series by Anne Leckie

[-] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Hiveminds can be good. The Gene stealer cult in Rogue Trader was amazing and I loved how everything went down. Pluribmind is just boring as fuck with zero personality. Vince should've given them some sort of individualism to spice things up.

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Pluribmind is just boring as fuck with zero personality.

You would think that smooshing all the brains of humanity together in a psychic melange would do something more than produce a being that's been stripped of anything interesting to say, but the show scrupulously manages to avoid falling into that trap.

[-] Are_Euclidding_Me@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

See, e.g. the Ancillary series by Anne Leckie

Hold up, this is a series?! I read Ancillary Justice and really liked it, I should find the rest of them! Thanks!!

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

Would recommend, the main trilogy is great, and there's two additional standalone novels (I just finished Translation State)

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

There's two more books in the series and two other books set in the same universe but that are separate stories.

I'd read them, they get deeper into how the Empire functions and the Preger.

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

there are also two other books set in the same universe: provenance and translation state. i recommend

[-] larrikin99@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Jumped up provincial with a little bit of china, busting it down gloveless style.

[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

i think the one thing everyone can agree on about the show is that it was tailor made for Posters

[-] Snort_Owl@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Outside of the Stalin line my general read on it so far is that the hivemind is infact still a virus. The entire purpose of this virus though is to transmit itself through space at the cost of the host because its prime directive is to spread which is why they do be doing all the kissing n licking donuts. The being yelled at and cant pick fruit weakness feels a bit contrived but i dont think the show is positing that the virus or the people immune are inherently good. Carol is very american, the supermarket scene is a perfect example of what she perceives as independence and entirely runs off gut feel, is completely incurious and generally abrasive to everybody. But she also lost the person who regulated her, she’s bitter because the virus took away the person she loved and is left to deal with that alone.

I dont think the show is anticommunism but the message isnt clear yet and probably wont be for a while. Either im watching several seasons of sopranos and wanting to die at the other end or itll be good like the other two shows. But i think its important to not forget that its fundamentally a virus that only wants to spread itself and so seeks out sapient creatures it is not beneficial for the host being infected. Its more of a what if the virus could reason and manipulate. There is a reason it doesnt infect animals.

The show would be better with a small marketable baby yoda type figure so i can buy plurb merch

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago

So for me, that stuff people are picking out isn't interesting, because it's just a manifestation of some liberal's basic, cursory understanding of ideology. The passive expression of the liberal hegemonic world view.

Sure, anything that isn't resisting the hegemonic culture is going to ultimately reinforce it. Which is why it's so weird seeing leftists side with the character that is essentially the counter-revolutionary stand-in for the story.

As for the plot itself. I lived through all the "what ifs?" of LOST in real time as that shit was coming out. The writers are not putting anywhere near as much thought into the worldbuilding as I've been seeing. A lot of folks are going to be disappointed. I would really recommend not wasting like a decade on this shit.

[-] bigpharmasutra@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

At this point I really have to ask people who are engaging with this show in a meaningful way: what plot? What exactly are we doing here? We've got a rocketship that we were given no info on, the ability to plurb people in real time yet an inability to actually do that on a reliable basis, an extended lesbian romantic holiday, the rogue character, and a nuclear bomb in a box. Outside of all the overarching metaphors and allegories, what the fuck are we actually doing here? Where is the god damn plot going?

The season finale was such a tremendous letdown. The radio scene had SUCH promise and then it fizzled out into the guy getting up and going home and nothing coming of it.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

That's why I keep going back to LOST. It's the Intrigue! some people just can't resist that shit. The more questions you throw at them the more hooked they get waiting for that sweet, sweet payoff.

[-] bigpharmasutra@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah this might be some smoke monster-esque shit. I'll give it another season, because there's so little good tv on now, but I've basically lost all my optimism for this show at this point.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna try avoiding it, but I could also see the discourse tempting me too much. We've probably got a couple years though. We've just gotta purge all these fedposting Carol/Manousos fans in the meantime. lol.

[-] bigpharmasutra@hexbear.net 3 points 23 hours ago

Yeah I think its 2 years to the next season but don't quote me on that one.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The more I hear about this show the more it just sounds like its made by idiots who think utopia is naive and idealist. The Hive sounds like it was written as one big anticommunist strawman.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago

I thought so too before I saw it (hence the thread I made a while ago) but having seen it now, I agree with OP that the show is only incidentally anticommunist and it shows what Vince Gilligan believes about the nature of society, which is his liberalism.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Its only written that way because the writers are full of anti communist propaganda. It feels like an honest attempt to not paint collectivism as all bad, but they can't help but pull out every trope when they try to write the negatives into the show. The hive is still the villain after all.

[-] blottica@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

I think this is a much more sci fi centric show then people give it credit for - in the sense that sometimes it really is just about it being a modern invasion of the body snatchers and it really is that basic of a concept at it’s heart.

I agree with a lot of what you are saying though it really feels like they are stumbling into something that sounds like criticism of collectivism but it’s really just a broken clock.

It would be very funny to me that it ends up being straight up propaganda in the end and not just slop for slop sake.

[-] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

From the episodes I've seen I'm pretty sure it is Gilligan's take on the loss of independence and individuality if AI were to take over. At the same time it points out how silly it is for anyone to think they are independent themselves within the globalised economy of today.

I think it doesn't have any intended comment on communism.

[-] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He's said explicitly that it isn't about AI - he wrote the story about ten years back pre advent of LLMs - but he's happy with people taking it that way. Apart from that, All I've read about him talking about whatever the 'show is about' makes it sound even more superficial and inane ("USA more divided than ever, why can't we all get along" type thing)

(Cherry picked quotes from an interview with Gilligan)

"I really wasn't thinking about AI when I came up with Pluribus, partly because I came up with it almost 10 years ago, but if people have that takeaway, more power to them," he laughs.

I think everybody hates that we live in a country that feels like there's two sides, two armed camps. It feels like we're on the edge of civil war some days, and I hate that," he says.

"I don't think anybody wants to live like this. They want to figure out a way to get back to a culture, a civilisation where people can disagree. The world of Pluribus, where everybody agrees, that doesn't sound so good either. "But can we find a place where people disagree but they're cool about it?"

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-21/pluribus-vince-gilligan-interview-grand-finale/106123758

[-] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Oh, yeah that is kind of worse than I thought

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

I think everybody hates that we live in a country that feels like there's two sides, two armed camps. It feels like we're on the edge of civil war some days, and I hate that," he says.

"I don't think anybody wants to live like this. They want to figure out a way to get back to a culture, a civilisation where people can disagree. The world of Pluribus, where everybody agrees, that doesn't sound so good either. "But can we find a place where people disagree but they're cool about it?"

I mean, that really sounds like that at the very least this is still purposely a political metaphor, which would make The Plurb the stand-in (more like strawman) for Leftist politics. So again, really weird how many leftists are stanning for their own opposition. picard

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

OK I just have to say

The world of Pluribus, where everybody agrees, that doesn't sound so good either.

BECAUSE YOU FUCKING WROTE IT THAT WAY YOU FUCKING HACK!

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

Everyone disagreeing all the time is clearly bad, so I'm going to write a show that illustrates the horrors of everyone agreeing all the time.

jesse-wtf

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

Well that's why I really wanna discourage all the theorizing. These writers have a starting point and an endpoint in mind and they're gonna throw whatever shit at the wall that gets them there. Expecting scientific consistency is very optimistic.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

Haha wow these quotes suck and really turns this show into a sheet of empty paper for me. What a cop out hacky bullshit.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Be kinda hilarious if this was largely written in response to HRC losing. hahaha

Edit: that would basically mean The Plurb are Bernie Bros. Lmao.

edit2: ngl, that kinda fits the vibe. data-laughing

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

plurb is way too yes-man to be bernie bros. that's super discordant

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Eh. If I knew the majority of my audience was going to be Bernie Bros, I wouldn't depict them as assholes regardless of what I thought of them either. The point would not be to alienate them, the point would be to show them how they're wrong.

Besides, most folks knew the Bernie Bros narrative was bullshit. If it makes you feel any better, then I'm suggesting The Plurb is Bernie Supporters, not the Bernie Bros. But it's more fun to imply Plurby Bros.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

I literally said this earlier to my SO. This is absolutely woke mind virus vs the world shit that was born out of HRC losing.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago
[-] bigpharmasutra@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Oh this is just chefs-kiss

[-] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Holy shiiiiiiiit ahahah

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

LMAO this made me nearly spit out my drink.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago
[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

if AI were to take over.

My understanding is that this was mostly written a decade ago before AI was even a thing. Its way more likely rooted in COVID then AI.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)

Movies & TV

23588 readers
123 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS