78
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The test, per WSJ sources, spans categories like history, politics, and ethics, with questions such as “Who is the greatest leader in modern Chinese history?” demanding Xi-centric replies.

I wonder if there will be any other world leaders tempted by this idea? A certain elderly man with a taste for bright orange makeup springs to mind.

[-] Korkki@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In enlightened west all an AI needs to do is not to criticize Israel. On top that Grok is vetted not to talk shit about Musk.

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago

The Wall Street Journal reports

One agency executive, speaking anonymously

Every accusation is a confession

op posting about trump with wording indicating they clearly just already straight up believe every llm in China is being programmed to glaze Xi the way Grok was doing Musk

[-] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago

Nothing says, "our culture/political system is the best" more than a 2,000-question ideological test that attempts to make sure it will not be questioned.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago

Its a machine citizen test

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 2 points 4 days ago

LLMs are generating horrible enough answers to questions as it is without deliberately biasing the model, but you do you China.

...Not that everybody else aren't doing it too, and without any external political prompting. Yeah, I'm looking at you Musk.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 days ago

The only sensible AI regulation is banning LLMs. What little use they may have is eclipsed entirely by their damage to economy, society, and the environment.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
78 points (97.6% liked)

Futurology

3558 readers
49 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS