112
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The cuts to several states come amid an escalating fraud fallout fueled by a dubious YouTube investigation of Minnesota day cares.

The Trump administration on Monday said it had slashed billions in social services funds to a handful of blue states as part of its escalating response to new and unproven fraud allegations in Minnesota.

The Department of Health and Human Services will freeze $10 billion worth of federal grants to California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, an HHS official told HuffPost, confirming news first reported by The New York Post.

It’s not clear whether the freeze was inspired by specific fraud allegations or solely for political reasons. Officials did not immediately provide a public explanation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Those blue state citizens are what funds the red states...

I've been saying it for almost a year now, it won't be easy but blue states need to stop having employees federal taxes sent off every check. Instead send it to a fund, when trump pulls shit like this, use the fund to make up the difference.

It's gonna come to that point eventually and it's a complicated process, so we should have it set up and ready to pull the trigger.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

For real, if California and New York alone stopped paying federal taxes, the federal government would go bankrupt immediately.

Why pay into a system that won't pay anything back out to you? Those funds are just going to the likes of Thiel and Musk, who already don't pay enough taxes. Fuck em.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

On an individual level everyone can do this today, change your federal withholding to $0 on a w4.

It's 100% legal, and you will still need to pay taxes in April. But you can just not pay anything ahead of time. That whole process is essentially a payment plan that's relatively new but already taken for granted of by the government.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The social-media-conspiracy-to federal-policy pipeline is becoming suspiciously short.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

When you are run by a dictator, you only need to convince one person to make a change. It’s madness.

[-] foodandart@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago

Ofc it's political. Trump's an erratic, angry old man that even Susie Wiles said has the temperment of a raging drunk.

(FYI, Trump is a teetotaler. His behavior, that's dementia in action..)

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 3 months ago

You can't blame the dementia, he has behaved like that for decades.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 8 points 3 months ago

Not sure how things roll in the "united" states but obviously states shouldn't support the federation if theyre treated unfairly.

[-] gustofwind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I know it’s an old fashioned idea but the point of the union is to force the states to work these issues out without resorting to civil war…again

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Time for blue states to stop allowing federal taxes to be paid by their citizens. File suits on behalf of your constituents. No taxation without representation

It would be fucking phenomenal for my state to keep the dollars internal and invest in more in its citizens. Why the fuck am I working everyday to subsidize the fuckers in the south and midwest that keep voting to wreck everything around us.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Agree 100% they can live in pedofile propaganda con man land and we can cut that insanity off

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Time for the Blue States to cut funding to the Red Oblasts.

[-] silvadinlabop@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago

Hey, if red states want all the welfare people…

[-] KiloGex@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

So then blue state citizens should cut their federal tax payments. No taxation without representation.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

It’s not clear whether the freeze was inspired by specific fraud allegations or solely for political reasons.

Seriously? It's not? Does it need to be spelled out in 24 point font, in an affidavit, witnessed and signed by a judge for it to be clear to these people?

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

alleged minnesota fraud that was fully debunked within 48 hours as hot bullshit.

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Then blue states should allow companies with employees in that state to not deduct federal taxes

[-] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Why would blue states still pay into the federal government when they're not getting anything out of it anymore? Seems to me they're financing their own abusive relationship. I don't understand how this works. Aren't blue states the only reason these crappy red states are even still slightly functional?

I'm not American but it seems to me that collectively the blue states would hold a lot of power if they're the financial backbone of the country. Can't they swing their weight around a little?

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You would think. Our stupid country has senators based on statehood rather than representation of population. The pocket of Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Montana has ~3.5 million people combined, yet has 4x the voting power of California which has 10x the population. It's a garbage system.

Also if you look at virtually any statistic by state. Red states are a dumpster fire. Literacy, STDs, teen pregnancy, income, obesity, etc.

Only a complete fucking moron could be a republican. The evidence of their failure and unnecessary cruelty is overwhelming.

[-] pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Taxes levied by the US federal government are against individuals and businesses directly. States also levy their own taxes independently. So these funds paid to the federal government (largely) don't go through state hands.

[-] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ah I see. Then it makes sense. The population itself would have to stop paying taxes. That's a bit more complicated because then individuals would be sanctioned by the government and people probably don't want to take that risk.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They could withhold taxes on state employees. That would be easy. If they wanted to go full second civil war, They could pass laws making it illegal for companies to pay taxes to the federal government.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You are correct. Unfortunately, state governments don't have a hand in federal taxation. Employers typically withhold the estimated amount from employee's paychecks, and at the beginning of each year everyone submits a tax form. If they paid over their obligation, they get a refund; if they underpaid, they owe money.

Even if someone opts out of tax withholdings, they're responsible for sending their taxes to the federal government each year; typically through a third-party for-profit business (especially now that Republicans trashed the recent IRS pilot which allowed people to file their taxes directly to the federal government for free).

The only solution would be for every resident of that state to individually opt out of federal tax withholdings from their employer, but then they'd be individually liable for submitting their taxes each year. While the IRS doesn't currently have the staffing to handle that if everyone does it, that would require a level of collective trust-in-ones-fellows that simply doesn't exist in this era.

It would be much better if states could offer their protection, but apparently states can't even keep ICE out so the IRS would be no different...

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I already do this because they seize my refund to pay off student loans.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They are desperate to start an insurrection so they can cancel the 2026 midterms

[-] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

And you know, once you bring your population to the point of violent, open rebellion, things will settle right down with a little martial law!

[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This decision was made based on a Youtube video, made by some rando with Trump-friendly views, directed at Minnesota's most visible minority.

This should go without saying but: Youtubers. Should. NOT. Influence. Policy.

Correct me if I'm wrong but not even Rush Limbaugh or Alex Jones ever had this much sway on influencing policy.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Rush Limbaugh literally set the stage for this. The kind of guy who should have been immediately cancelled. Instead, he was allowed to live on as a celebrity radio hate monger. Hate radio poisoned an entire generation of people. Rush didn't do it by himself, but he was the poster child for it.

Alex may have not had as big of an impact but he tortured people who lost their children in probably one of the most psychologically damaging ways possible.

Allowing people like that to make millions off of lies and hate is no kind of freedom for those who suffer. Of course Trump awarded Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom. I think he may have influenced a little more than policy.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They were going to cut welfare and social programs anyway, that's all they're here to do, they are gutting our treasury before they all get kicked out or guillotined. If the wind shifted in the wrong direction they would announce it's reason to cut funding.

Pay attention people, this is your script. When you talk to people on the fence, tuned out or already leaning right, you do not argue about social policies, racism, immigration or any of the other hot-button social issues that are on fire right now. Average dumb fucks (which is everyone) don't actually care about any of that. I'm sorry but people just broadly only care about themselves. Maybe that will change someday, but for now you are not going to get success finger-wagging and pointing out the suffering of marginalized people.

What you say is this: "Okay they're cutting all this funding for medical care and poor people, they cut NASA and all these boards for health and education and environment protection, so where's the benefit? Where is that money going? Are your groceries cheaper? Is your healthcare cheaper? Is anything getting better?"

That's it. Just ask this one question. If it's some MAGAss who starts ranting and sputtering, you let it go. Or just repeat the question. "Where is your money that they're taking out of your check? Where is going to? Getting oil from Venezuela? Are YOU going to get a barrel of crude?"

We can leverage the average dumbass American if we make it a question not a lecture. People are dumber than they've ever been, but they still want to look smart, and if you ask them a question they can't answer, they will chew on it so they know how to answer it next time someone asks.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Along similar lines, I always noticed how we have a vigorous debate about tax rates but nobody ever seems to discuss the benefits you receive for them. The tax rate isn't going down to zero for working people ever. As long as we have to pay, surely we should get something in return.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

100%, we need to keep the focus on what our government is doing for us, we're supposed to be the people who pay for and "own" our government, we pay their bills with our hard work and money, we sacrifice our future so that we can have a government. "We the people" needs to have meaning. Turn people's desire to be patriotic against the right targets.

[-] jdredbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Absolutely. People who don't "care" about "politics" , they do care about economic issues that affect them

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

He really wants a war, whether it be a civil or with another country.

This way he can cancel all elections and become the King of America.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

The executive doesn't have that unilateral authority. What he's doing is illegal; unconstitutional, even.

"No taxation without representation" ring any bells?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

It’s not cause of the issues in Minnesota. It’s cause they are blue. Full stop.

Also, Trump is a convicted felon and pedophile. So there’s that.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Aren't we pretty much at or close to trumps a child sex trafficker now in addition to being a pedophile?

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah. I think so. I was calling that like a month ago.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
112 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29623 readers
81 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS