45
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago

... the time to do this shit has long been upon us. Who gives a fuck what they can do, until they do it? As an American, I'm begging you, put up or shut-up.

I didn't vote for the baby in office, and I would gladly suffer to see his toys taken away by the adults.

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Its an indian website

Its not the opinion of any european

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Facts ≠ Opinions, although I am going by the title where it says "Can", rather than "should". I stated my opinion though.

Maybe Europe would act, if enough former colonies call them cowards.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wont suffer from this, but ill gladly watch you and my neighbirs suffer! obviously not being serious, but damn thats almost what you sound like lol. If you had some money, suddenly youre an asshole with that mindset is all. My neighbors who cant tough it out shouldnt suffer because you accept a raw deal is all im sayin

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Depends on the neighbor. If they have a trump flag, fuckem. I literally don't give a shit anymore. "Oh if you say people should suffer the consequences of their actions you're somehow in favor of collective punishment" is a braindead take that is only used by people trying to get out of the consequences of their actions.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is not a "YSK", it's just yet another post about (US...) politics.

Seriously, this problem ruined !showerthoughts@lemmy.world and it's ruining this community too.

PS: very pertinent ongoing discussion

[-] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Sign of the times... If it is on everyone's mind, it will infiltrate generic subs like these

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, the problem is that Europe is going to dick around not doing that while the other side is actually using bullets.

[-] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

America is doing quite fine wreaking havoc on itself, no need for Europe to get involved.

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

No, unfortunately, it doesn't work like that. “Europe” doesn't owns a lot of US bonds; private investors from Europe own them. There's no way to compel them to sell them.

[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Ok except you're completely wrong. The foreign holdings are both private and government owned. From https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/RS/PDF/RS22331/RS22331.51.pdf

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ok except you're completely wrong regarding Europe. Governmental investments in US are mainly made by countries outside Europe, like China. The only European exception is Norway, which alone can't do much (and is not in the EU).

So yes, almost half of foreign US bonds owning are by governments, just not European ones.

[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Hmmm except that just saying the same thing again still doesn't make you right.

When you get further down the pdf from Congress (or any other valid source on government debt breakdown) there's a number of European countries. Such as this.

Have you got any actual sources for your statements other than just repeating the same thing?

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Again, your table doesn't differentiate public and private ownership. You obviously don't understand the numbers you're sending. Citing page 1 of your own link:

Investors in the United States and abroad include official institutions, such as the U.S. Federal Reserve and foreign central banks; financial institutions, such as commercial banks; and private individual investors.

Both financial institutions and individual investors are private. So your link is totally irrelevant to our discussion (as you would know if you had read it). Yes, for example Luxembourg holds $423.9 billions, but do tou actually think the Luxembourgian state owns it? Of course not! Luxembourg is a trading place where a lot of holdings are based. These holdings hold the far biggest part of those billions. It's the same with the UK (the London City is another trading place with a lot of holdings). And most of European countries.

As far as I know, the US Treasury doesn't communicate on this, so we don't have strict numbers. But it's a well-known thing, as stated the Financial Times recently:

But this doesn’t change the fact that most of these assets are not actually owned by European governments (the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund being the only notable exception). These stocks and bonds are actually overwhelmingly held by the private sector: thousands of insurance companies, pension plans, banks and other institutional investors, and millions of ordinary people.

I'd love for Europe to have this kind of power, but we simply don't have it (we have others however, like the “commercial bazooka”).

[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

The section you've quoted that line from is only talking about privately owned US debt.

As you can see from the actual beginning of the paragraph rather than picking out the words you like at the end.

As I've already posted and mentioned right at the start of the pdf

See where it says 44.2% are held by foreign governments. Governments.

In the document from Congress.

About their own national debt ownership breakdown.

Then when we look at the country breakdown of ownership of this debt later on there are plenty of European nations in there.

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As you can see from the actual beginning of the paragraph rather than picking out the words you like at the end.

The beginning of the paragraph changes nothing. Two different sentences can have two different meaning; the text says “in the US and abroad”.

As I've already posted and mentioned right at the start of the pdf

Again that's a worldwide average. It's not equally distributed. Prove me wrong instead of repeating your error.

there are plenty of European nations in there.

Again, this table mixes public and private investors and is then irrelevant. Prove me wrong instead of repeating your error.

[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Nope your turn to prove that none of this debt is owned by European governments.

I've provided the most reputable source that says the debt is owned by governments and within their breakdown it says some of those countries are European.

It doesn't provide a detailed breakdown of private Vs government for these countries but no where does it say that is debt is only privately owned in European nations.

You need to prove that or stop talking nonsense.

Although not technically part of the EU anymore the UK government has confirmed a number of times that it owns US debt. Other nations will certainly do this as well.

Unless you can provide a source that says that no European governments own US debt you're just making things up.

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Show me where I said that European governments owned no US debt, please. I said that it was mostly owned by private agents in Europe. The keyword here is mostly. Mainly. For the greatest part. Predominantly. Don't change the terms of the discussion now that you feel cornered.

Of course the UK, Luxembourg, France or Ireland own US bonds. But what is owned by European countries is largely dwarfed by what's owned in European countries. Not a word in the Congress's document contradict that, and I provided a source that you conveniently ignored.

So if the European countries sold what they own directly, the effect would be weak. For this idea to work, they'd have to make private agents cooperate, and I don't think they can.

[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here we go your own post where you sat they weren't owned by European governments. Only Norway

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not the respondee but you may want to reread that post. they use the word mainly there to indicate most but not all. You are risking cherry picking the argument. By what I see it, the wording for "only exception" since the word mainly is used, would indicate that the only major exception would be, not the "only exception" would be.

That's how I read it anyway.

regardless though, the entire theory is silly anyway, doing what the original article suggests would also send the world into a global recession and would be the a classic case of shooting your own foot in an attempt to harm the opponent.

ammendum/post addition: regardless of who owns it though, the outcome is still unlikely. For government it would be political suicide in democratic countries, and for private sector it would be a massive financial dumpster fire. I think finding alternative export/import partners is far more likely to happen than something of the scale the article posts

[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It's the last line. Where they say it is owned by governments just not European ones. That's just wrong. They do own some of it. How much is up for debate but to say they don't is wrong.

Also agree they probably won't do anything with it as using it as a lever will also damage global markets, increase the overall cost of debt and impact all the economies involved.

However the world seems so fucking mental at the moment. So who's to say it won't happen.

Also I do wonder if China might do it with theirs just because they can, to flex their muscles or as a big fuck you to the US.

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I counted, I say 5 times “mainly” or a variation of “mainly” in our discussion and I wrote one ambiguous (if taken out of context) sentence. You're trying to save face at this point.

[-] notaviking@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Why does this sketchy website not having valid certificates

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Why is your browser out-of-date?

I mean, I don't like the site per se, but Firefox isn't complaining for me, so I am legit wondering what browser you are using that does complain. Are you planning on giving that site your personal information?

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago

US will collapse on its own.

NATO colonies have been increasing US debt holdings in 2025, instead of sharply reducing them in face of US threats against them. Ending US military procurement, boeing, caterpillar, and US NATO membership, would be destruction of US empire.

The US proxy war on Russia through Ukraine was a US war on Europe. Nordstream, and energy capture for a year or 2. The biggest Trump lie at Davos is that Europe's energy is expensive due to their adoption of renewables. When, in fact it is their capture to extortionist US energy, instead of Russian bridge energy, and military subservience to US, that is destroying Europe. Far better and more equitable trading opportunity with Russia replacing US as a trading partner, or even as a NATO member.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
45 points (89.5% liked)

You Should Know

43722 readers
152 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS