133
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by micnd90@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

https://www.axios.com/2026/01/22/ice-funding-government-shutdown-house-democrats

Seven Democrats voted for the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill that included funding for ICE: Reps. Jared Golden (Maine), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), Henry Cuellar (Texas), Don Davis (N.C.), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Tom Suozzi (N.Y.) and Laura Gillen (N.Y.).

the-democrat

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 51 points 1 week ago

Look at my opposition party dawg

[-] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

what name am i putting on my write-in ballot?

[-] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Joe Biden 2028

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago

Henry Cuellar

Wow who could have predicted that the anti-abortion guy was also pro-fascism? Sure am glad they ran him over that more progressive woman.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

iirc Pelosi personally showed up in Texas to campaign for him

[-] Bobson_Dugnutt@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago

I know that this is just rotating villain shit, but I do have to point out that any party with real discipline would've expelled these scumbags years ago

[-] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 week ago

Discipline is only for policing "Left-deviations".

[-] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

Like, regardless of if your goals are good or bad, any real political party with intentions of achieving their stated goals would not allow defections like this

[-] Muinteoir_Saoirse@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is what they want, though. This allows them to ensure the thing gets passed, since they agree with the Republicans (and have many of the same donors), while publicly pretending that they don't. And since most people do not think structurally or systemically, it allows people to be upset at "traitors" rather than the party. It will always be just enough Democratic "traitors" that allow Republican legislation that the party is vocally opposed to, to pass.

The party didn't betray the people, a few representatives betrayed the party. And of course, individualism and freedom of expression/speech means that the party can't punish the traitors, because that would be authoritarian. it is up to the people to vote the traitors out in the next election. Either they will have forgotten about the specific treachery by then, or else there will be no primary, because the incumbent will be unopposed, and the two-party system will ensure that the "traitors" get re-elected anyway, because you have to vote blue no matter who or else you are now the traitor to the party.

[-] Rojo27@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

Damn, I can't wait for the upcoming [most important of my lifetime] election so that there is a bluewave to sweep more of these fascists fucks into Congress.

[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

No surprise, tbh. Also no surprise to see two Texas dems there either. As feckless as they are fascist.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

I see the names are already in the hat for who gets to be the sequel to Joe Manchin

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Look, due to Joe Manchin 2.0, Sinema 2.0, and the razor thin majority they can't do much. That's the reality. You have to accept that. And it's why we have to vote harder in the next election and then we can...

[-] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Dems will continue running the ICE if they win the next election.

[-] Civility@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
133 points (98.5% liked)

news

24560 readers
741 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS