52
submitted 2 weeks ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/science@mander.xyz
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is an example of how we should be using ML. Specialized agents that are trained for very specific goals that are otherwise incredibly tedious, expensive, and inefficient to explore. Not fucking psychosis-inducing chatbots and propaganda generators.

[-] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago

Both are excellent at what they're designed to do. One examines breasts and one generates natural sounding language. It's only when you start using it for something it's not designed to do when you run into problems. Applies to both.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

This is why I hate the term "AI" to describe LLMs, which only passively have to do with ML algorithms.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

Science

6750 readers
80 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS