Or better yet use GrapheneOS 2FA biometric + PIN + duress PIN + auto reboot:

• If someone spies on you unlocking your phone, they don't get your encryption password
• If they figure out your PIN, they can't unlock your phone without you physically being there, and your phone may reboot to the password unlock before they get it to you
• If they compel you to use biometrics, they can't legally compel you to give them your PIN
• If they decide to start trying out common PINs and you set your duress PIN to one of them, then it wipes your phone

You could set it up so that only your left pinky works. After they try the other more likely fingers they're just going to figure it didn't work.

Or just use lockdown mode.

What's interesting is that the DC Circuit doesn't allow authorities to force someone to unlock their device with biometrics. I'm assuming that Natanson's home is not inside the DC Circuit.

It's a legally unclear area right now whether or not authorities can force you to unlock your device with biometrics. As such, it's better not to use them: https://decentproject.org/should-you-use-biometrics-on-your-phone

How is current USA administration performing these clear gestapo level violations of amendments and everyone's just like "okay". ?!

Or at the very least; turn your phone entirely off (shutdown) whenever you expect or encounter police contact.

Biometrics only work when the device is already running. Mobile devices are in their most locked down/secure state when 'at rest', ie shutdown.

In android; there is also a 'lockdown' mode you can quickly activate from the power off screen, that disables Biometrics until next unlock with a pin/pattern, but doesn't fully shutdown so you can still quickly access things like the camera. This has to be explicitly enabled in settings first and will not offer much protection from various lockscreen bypass software available to law enforcement.

The only safe phone is a phone with a strong password thats in a powered down state. Otherwise there are tools to gain full access.

hold the device in front of her face and to forcibly use her fingers to unlock it. In other words, a judge gave the FBI permission to attempt to bypass biometrics

This isn't bypassing biometrics. This is using biometrics as intended. Bypassing implies this was an unexpected side effect when every security researcher ever has warned that biometrics is intrinsically vulnerable and a terrible password substitute for this exact reason.

i guess another way is to use those shitty privacy screen protectors that do not work with fingerprints at all. They can try all they want, its not gonna work.

I don’t know what it is on android, but five quick presses of the primary button on iOS will put the phone into a mode where you must enter your password to unlock it.

Use GrapheneOS so you can "unlock" your phone and enter the wipe code instead.

Why? Apple and Google will just unlock it for them later.

Another thing for an overhauled Constitution. One's body and devices should be considered to be papers and effects.

that's precisely why i never stopped using a password to access my phone.