46
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago

Tim.. suing everyone else wont make epic store a great place to buy games

Look to GOG for inspiration…

[-] Tuscy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

He’s just salty because the only games people “purchase” are the weekly free ones.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I don't even bother with those anymore. I never play the free ones I have, because I'd have to use Epic's software.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

Playnite is the better choice if you're on Windows, but either way, don't let Tim's dumb store stop you from ruining his day by generating a bunch of metrics that show you're only playing freebies!

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Keep collecting them. Each one you get costs Epic money and helps counter some of that Fortnite cash that lets Epic keep paying for exclusive contracts. Keep bleeding them and eventually they won't be able to keep buying exclusive releases.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Epic pays a flat rate to offer games for free, they don't pay per download.

Downloading them just helps Epic inflate their "active users" number when talking to investors.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 13 points 3 months ago

Has epic games developed anything like Proton? Valve isn't just a store.

[-] IntrusiveThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

What do you mean? Isn't Kratos dancing orange justice innovative enough?

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 13 points 3 months ago

Steam is the last company that has held out against enshittification.

[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

It feels like all the other corpos are mad and want to sue Valve to force them into enshittification.

I'm all for holding companies accountable - when legal pressure forced Valve into creating a return policy, I was happy for that. But this is a $900 Million nothing burger imo. Publishers are mad they can't get the exposure and sales numbers on a cheaper platform. Cheaper platforms are mad that they still can't get people to switch to them by significantly under-cutting Steam. That's (publishers) customers mad they have to pay a 'premium' (basically the 'market rate' for the service before epic decided to start under-cutting btw) for a better service and the competition mad that a LOT of (publishers) customers are willing to pay that 'premium'.

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

Their store UI could be better, searching the database by conditions and clearly seeing why something isn't available in your region\country\demographic would be good.

But at the same time it's good enough for me to even be thinking about such conveniences.

Also I've remembered recently my dad saying some 6 years ago that nobody makes convenient UIs because it's bad for commerce. A UI filled with suffering allows you to charge for directed solutions. And if a UI isn't filled with suffering, there must be something else. Like Telegram and VK which are convenient to use (compared to WhatsApp and Facebook and ...), but are Russian special services' honeypots.

Convenience is a weapon. And a very expensive one, if Steam store's UI were more convenient, the load on servers would probably be 10x what it is, for a similar structure of purchases, except probably harder to direct.

[-] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 months ago

That’s why they are getting sued.

[-] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well... duh. The guy runs a competing storefront who's only claims to fame are:

  1. Spending a bunch of money for timed exclusivity and free giveaways, rather than building out core features.
  2. They give devs a better cut than Steam to claim moral high ground.

... that's it, that's all the reasons to use Epic, unless you want to play Fortnite or participate in an Early Access period where they chose Epic to reduce the overwhelming amount of feedback like Hades.

[-] tharien@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

“They charge developers too much!”

“Ok, Tim, so how exactly do you make money for your company, then? Because giving away all the free stuff seems like awfully bad business.”

Never thought I’d be defending a company charging a lot of money but since Steam actually does provide an excellent, stable service with bonuses like Linux development and the Steam Deck I mean, I really ain’t that mad, especially they still offer really good sales.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

“They charge developers too much!”

So you should be able to undercut them, right? Right?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] xtools@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

Tim Sweeney can gargle my ballsack

[-] DizzyMoth@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

The only interesting argument I heard about this demand was that when you buy game you are tie to respective store, and you cannot buy content like dlc outside that store. I wpukd be amazing for the customers if thus wasn't the case

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The only reason I had an epic account was for their free giveaway. And now that I’ve switched to bazzite, and considering their poor Linux support, I’m inclined to just cut bait on them.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Reminder: Epic CEO Tim Sweeney has defended child pornography, saying that stopping it is "gatekeeping".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

I'm really tired of seeing this idiot quoted.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 3 months ago

is that Valve's policies and position as the leading distribution service in PC gaming means publishers are effectively blocked from selling games and add-ons at lower prices on competing stores

I still don't get this. As far as I can find, Steam doesn't allow steam keys to be sold cheaper elsewhere, but they don't bother with prices of games in other stores.

And doesn't Epic have a bunch of games exclusive to their store?

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I still don't get this. As far as I can find, Steam doesn't allow steam keys to be sold cheaper elsewhere, but they don't bother with prices of games in other stores.

This is tricky. Officially Valve doesn't have any rules about non-Steam game prices on other stores. Unofficially evidence has been put forward by way of emails between developers and Valve that seem to show that Valve unofficially requires price parity with other stores and will punish games that offer lower prices elsewhere.

The charitable interpretation is that their policies are worded confusingly and some of their agents are misinterpreting the rule requiring Steam key prices to be uniform as applying to non-Steam keys. The uncharitable interpretation is that Valve knows such a policy would get them in hot water with anti-monopoly laws and so they're careful to make sure it stays an unofficial policy.

DRM free, launcher free games or fuck off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Is that the Epic that agreed to six-year $800 million partnership with Google recently?

[-] IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Out of all the digital stores Steam arguably offers by far the most actual functionality and features for its cut. It’s still too high, but it’s possibly the least egregious example vs Apple, Google etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

although I like a lot of what Valve does (I have a lot of Steam games, valve games, have a steam deck oled, use steamvr, etc) they are a fairly flawed company. sweeney is so great at shooting himself in the foot though that any opinion he has people will by default believe the opposite of (and probably should)

[-] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 3 months ago

I was almost forgetting Tim's whole deal seems to be antagonizing more successful companies than his.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No instead epic charges 12%, and if you use unreal engine but don't sell on egs they get a 5% royalty fee on all your sales. Sure those number are lower but egs isn't out here "empowering" devs

[-] lofuw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Epic would charge Steam's fees if they had Steam's marketshare.

Everyone thinking they care about creators or customers is a fucking moron.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

if you use unreal engine but don’t sell on egs they get a 5% royalty fee on all your sales.

Sounds like abusing market power.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

100%. Valve needs to start suing Epic for their game engine monopoly. It’s not about Valve it’s about protecting gamers.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
46 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

84324 readers
202 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS