84
I'm foss plus steam (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

Gatekeepers are the fucking worst. Every time I start reading up on something there's always a handful of miserable condescending shitheads being nasty to people because they're 'not 'doing it right.'

Most vegan threads I come across usually has some of these, insulting anyone that's not 100% on board even if they're trying to get into it. Audiophiles are pretty much on the same level as hardcore vegans when it comes to being obnoxious (recently saw someone ask why the op was bothering setting up a music system if they didn't have thousands of dollars to spare, for example). Linux users on support threads is a coin flip of whether they'll be helpful or insulting.

Let people ease into things, stop demanding perfection right out of the gates!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] anticapitalistpenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Anything worth doing is worth doing poorly

[-] pxlkttn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Everything in moderation, including moderation.

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

An issue with boycotts in general is that people are constantly talking about what not to do and not what to do alternatively or the specifics on how to get there. Eventually it makes you realize that literally anything you do will cause someone to get genocided or abused somewhere, and when they way out isn't clear or straightforward, now you're overwhelmed with thousands of things you hate that you do and have to figure out how to change on your own one by one, and those changes result in new problems that overwhelm you or turn out to also be unethical and you have to change them yet again. And in the end you hate yourself because your change attempts made you miserable while you're still doing doing harmful things and other people hate you because you're still causing genocides and the rest think you're an idiot or a hypocrite for trying at all, while meanwhile everyone else around you is just enjoying themselves and not giving a fuck, and you'll always be a terrible person anyways so you might as well give up.

I think if more people instead of saying "don't do this" instead said "do this instead" when they talked about what to boycott and why, that would help with harm reduction a lot more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

But never announce it on social media. The purists will fight you.

[-] WallsToTheBalls@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Vegans have the worst PR department ever

I’ve never encountered a group I mostly agree with that I want to avoid more

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

I've been a strict Vegan for over a decade now and even i tend to stay away from the crowd. It's a bit better offline, but depends on how much any person needs to boost their ego by signaling moral pureness.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

vegans as well as linux users are nowhere near as outspoken and petty as they are made out to be. personally i find jokes about that insufferable and ubiquitous. The ratio of jokes about this to actually people like this existing is like 100:1. my theory is, They get so much shit because them just existing reminds people of their own shortcommings, instead of applauding people doing the effort to pioneer a better world these people decide to make a snarky remark and continue being lazy and annoying with these jokes.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I support small changes for self improvement. Buying pints instead of fiths is a start.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, but there are really good vegan substitutes for bacon now. I think that tempeh bacon tastes better, and it's healthier, too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is such a conundrum for me because I absolutely support people eating less animals and animal produced products but veganism is not a diet it is a philisophy. You are not vegan if you do this and you should not call yourself vegan. Dilution of the term IS harmful. At its core veganism is the belief that animals should not be exploited for anything under any circumstances. They have every right to this earth as we do and it is our responsibility to insure their lives are not harmed by us.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

But the point of this is literally don't let perfect be the enemy of good. There's a rather large subset of the population that hears "oh no animals products at all? Forget that." And they commit to no animal product reduction at all. So then the question is harm no animals, or harm less animals?

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

There's a rather large subset of the population that hears "oh no animals products at all? Forget that."

Then they aren't getting the message. The answer to that is not to give up the message. It's to find a way to communicate that message so that it's understood.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Give them the gateway to veganism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Perfect is the enemy of good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dont get caught up in labels. If you want to vegetarian but don’t want to give up bacon just do it. Doesn’t matter what you label it it’s just a diet.

[-] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 2 points 2 weeks ago

what you believe is not shown by what you just tell yourself in your head, but shown by how you act. it means that if you say you believe in the ideals of veganism but can't give up a meal of bacon for it, you simply don't hold that value strong enough.

which is fine, its okay to be unsure about your values, but lets not confuse ourselves here by saying we can hold certain values without behaving like we actually do.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Some people think the definition of "freegan" means dumper diving and a hardcore anti consumerist attitude, but it could also mean "I don't buy meat, and am comfortable abstaining from it, but if it's given to me/made for a party, I am not against eating what's there." which I like.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

When the vegetarian option becomes cheaper and tastes just as good though, continuing to eat the meat version is an explicit choice.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It’s already cheaper it’s the tastes just as good part that is expensive. The faux meat is still expensive but vegetables have been cheap. If you didn’t care about variety you could eat chicken soup with a Costco chicken for a whole week for like $8

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

As a vegan I'm in favour of this because it makes it very clear in what specific way I am superior to someone

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Vegans will hate me for this but I only eat animals that I don't find particularly cute.

I don't eat pig or cow meat because they are beautiful, intelligent animals with great personalities. I do eat lamb because I've worked on sheep farms and they are dumb assholes. I eat chicken because they are basically vicious dinosaurs who would eat me if our sizes were reversed.

I've yet to get first hand experience with live sausages in their natural environment so I proceed with caution on a case by case basis.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Cheese man.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In a sense they're not wrong, but it depends on what is actually happening, and what the person's attitude is. It's good to pursue a lifestyle that's increasingly less dependent on animal products, even if imperfect. But is an actual progression occurring? It can often be the case, especially with dietary things, that a person will do something they believe is good once, and then treat themselves with a "cheat" day three times to that one good choice.

My change didn't happen overnight. But I approached it the same way that I did when I quit smoking: I kept track of how long I went without eating animal products. When I messed up and caved in, I would start over at 0 the very next day, and resolve to go even more days without animal products than I had done on the previous attempt.

One of the larger barriers I had to break through was an anxiety about nutrition. By that point I had a pretty firm grasp of nutritional science already, and knew that people can get all of their nutrients from plants. Consciously I knew better. But unconsciously there was still this wild fear as to whether or not I could keep living on plants only. It felt dangerous. I was going up against a lifetime of propaganda.

The last time I intentionally ate meat was some pepperoni. At that point I had gotten so used to living on plants that it didn't taste the same anymore. For one, it turned out at least for me, that after being without meat for long enough, it didn't smell the same anymore. The odor became more rotten. It didn't and doesn't matter how fresh the meat is, it all smells like putrefying carcass now. That was one thing that made the pepperoni taste off. The other was that apparently I had gotten used to having less salt in my diet, because it was a completely overpowering, disgusting salt bomb.

And something had clicked in my head by that point. As I was eating it I kept thinking, "Why am I doing this? I'm not even enjoying it. I don't need it. This isn't right." So I stopped eating it, and I haven't felt the need to consume any animal body parts ever again.

Anyway, I think where things become frustrating depends on how a person is framing their habits. If it's something like, "I'm trying, I am working on doing better," then it's understandable. But if it sounds more like the person is trying to justify eating animals or their products, and they're either talking about it in a way where they're trying to seek validation or using "militant vegans" as a strawman to criticise (see: the majority of the comments here) - that kind of makes it hard to remain diplomatic.

In cases like the latter, why are you so preoccupied with what other people think? It's not about vegans, it's about the animals. Going vegan requires going against an immense tide of social pressure, and that burden will never go away. You need to learn to think for yourself. Because when you do, you can look more objectively at how humankind treats every other species of sentient being on the planet and use your own internal moral compass to finally recognize what's right in front of your face: it is wrong to eat them. It is wrong to exploit them. What happens in factory farms and slaughterhouses is horrific. And it can never stop until we stop supporting it.

It's a hard conversation because y'all are demanding we tiptoe around a vast injustice that is urgent and actively resulting in the extreme suffering and deaths of billions every year. That's not even getting into the other issues like health problems, environmental destruction, and pandemic and zoonotic disease potential.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

I joined a group of people who wanted to eat more vegan/vegetarian. It was going fairly well, but then a guy joined the group who kept shaming us for eating any animal products, and a lot of us (myself included) dropped out. Shame.

I've started eating more fatty, sustainable fish, both for my health as well at the environment, and less red meat. Trying to do what I can.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
84 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

10878 readers
783 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS