There seems to be a correlation between being wealthy and being a thoughtless sociopath.
Who'da thunk
It's almost like pathologically hoarding wealth and power far beyond any personal practicality correlates with specific mental defects and personality disorders!
Every time someone pitches the argument that billionaires got there through sheer intelligence and hard work, I want to scream “Have you seen anything this person has wrote or said in public? They are barely coherent! If you asked them where they are right now, they probably wouldn’t know because they pay someone to babysit them through their day.”
There is a non-zero chance that this is due to them having enough money to constantly be on their drug(s) of choice without consequence, though.
I can't imagine myself living that shamelessly
Even people who can't afford it spend their lives completely self-medicated out the ass until the day they die, it should be self-evident that people with no limitations are going to just spend their days zonked out on the deck of their boat instead of working on helping others.
Real talk. I was unfortunately like that for about 15 years.
That is the biggest grift of all. Being a billionaire doesn't require intelligence, it requires you to be a ruthless asshole willing to exploit humanity for your own self interest.
The "Great Man Myth" was founded by people trying to justify their theft going back as long as we've had currency.
And having rich parents to get a huge head start.
This makes me so happy to see how based Chipzel is. For those who don't know, Chipzel is a really awesome classically trained chiptune musician. She's in a bunch of videogame soundtracks, check out her albums!
Back in the day the super rich couldn't bother to write any better, but at least they had the decency to hire a secretary so their messages were even somewhat legible. Seems like the habit of dictating your messages has all but vanished, even in professional contexts.
Maybe the 14-16 year olds they now "hire" are too young to write professionally, compared to the 18-20 somethings of yesteryears.
Hey hello there I had never heard yesteryears and it is exquisite.
Thank you very much
Everybody is so worried about the environmental impact of LLMs...has anyone stopped to consider the etymological impact?
Many people consider these things. On microblog fedi, I see threads (long posts, effectively) about this regularly.
This is honestly the first I'd thought about it...but language has always been dynamic and organic. Rapid communication has already led to rapid evolution of language and distribution of slang.
Then you get LLMs slurping up all this content and condensing it and adding their own language into the pile.
Eventually the majority of what they intake will be the output of all the other LLMs, and then it's a feedback loop.
This is why they think AI writing emails for them is revolutionary, isn’t it? Because they’re too fucking stupid to articulate a coherent thought.
they simply don't have to care. in a similar way where jobs was wearing jeans and black shirt while everyone around him was saluting in suits. he didn't have to.
also these messages were supposed to be private, lot of our signal/whatsapp chats also look less professional than work emails.
Were these emails encrypted? I thought that regular email is basically public, like sending a postcard. Or is that not the case anymore?
iirc it's tls secured between client and server and again between servers. So no e2ee, but if you trust your provider, everything should be good.
iirc law enforcment regularly forces providers to reveal content of client's mailboxes.
but if you trust your provider
Which you should never do. They might look good and safe today, but all it takes is a subpoena or a change in management and they will spill all the secrets. Most likely past and present.
Basically, don't do illegal shit over unencrypted forms of communications. But the billionares are not the smartest people, or Epstein thought he was protected enough that keeping a record of his co-conspirators and their crimes would protect him.
The equals aren't part of the emails actually, they're from bad decoding (probably by the govt) https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/02/whats-up-with-all-those-equals-signs-anyway/
I’m caught between thinking it’s a really stupid billionaire flex (interpret my unfiltered gibberish, peasant) and thinking he was actually just sub-literate.
I've known some pretty wealthy people. It's for sure a mix of both but mostly the latter.
The rich aren't better they are just better positioned.
Yeah but it's also that they're better positioned, yet definitely worse.
I can’t tell if it’s an encoding issue or just spastic.
It is an encoding issue from older mail servers.
well, some of it is, like the =, but he also misspells tons of stuff, adds spaces all over the place, doesn't capitalize anything, etc
It's encoding. I read a detailed explanation the other day, but can't find the article anymore. = and =n\ are new line indicators that have been truncated by incompetent text replacement by the handlers.
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
