But they're limited by weight, not volume. I could just sling a bigger battery underneath
Does the extra capacity make up for the incresed consumption due to extra weight?
You could get the same battery capacity in a smaller and/or more aerodynamic drone body, which would make it more efficient.
...
Yes, if battery density wasn't enough to overpower the weight of the batteries, it would t fly to begin with.
Like, you didn't even have to click the article or even be able to understand that, it's me tioned in OPs summary
More weight and worse heat dissipation.
Great idea!/S
More battery > more weight > more motor > more consumption > same battery lifespan
The life span is not going to stay the same. Adding more capacity yield more time in air, it's just that the effect is not linear.
that is essentially the rocket equation: More fuel - > more weight - > more fuel needed, etc. It is a balancing act.
Not exactly. They are increasing energy density. So for the same mass they are providing more mAh. More charge. Equal weight. Equal motor. Equal consumption. Longer flight time.
This doesn't really impact sUAS because they are already using pocket cells. Larger things that use jellyrolls, but need a better packing factor or would benefit from not carrying around all of those capsules and button tops are the target here
Let's assume they are talking about supercaps.
Futurology