That’s possible but also quite possibly attributable to the constant erosion of our schools and drift in curriculum. The last decade has seen enormous reductions in education quality.

I'm not sure why this article frames this outcome as the fault of Gen Z. It's not their fault their parents gave them iPads instead of spending time with them, nor for the chronically underfunded educational system.

told the New York Post

Vice (which is right wing trash these days), quoting an interview with the NYPost. Mmmm. Credible.

I'm sorry, did this study include baby boomers? Idiots destroyed the world in less than a lifetime.

Gen-X here. Don't fucking talk shit about our kids. Are they dumber or did they score lower on tests that no longer reflect the ways we interact with modern life?

Gen Z has managed something no modern generation pulled off before.

Whether it is true or not, i love how the article reflexively blames Gen Z. Like, did they invent Tiktok and brainrot? Did they ruin the school system? Did they put microplastics in the food and water?

That would mean that we peaked at the millennials?

"Omg! I gave my kid an Ipad as soon as he was able to hold it in his hands so it would do my job as a parent and now my kid is dumb?! How did this happen?!

Wait, and you also tell me that me voting for assholes that wanted to destroy the education system is also to blame?!

I can't believe I'm the one responsible for this!"

Gen Z has a lot of shit stacked against them. I'm glad the article doesn't go "blaming" Gen Z for "being dumber", but instead is focusing on the fact it's a parenting failure. COVID era learning difficulties, constantly being bombarded with tech designed to suck out their soul, AI being everywhere for their college age life, etc.

As a Millennial, I've seen the blame game. I only hope we come out of this spiral as a society.

people were saying this about millennials as well. in fact, James Flynn (for whom the Flynn effect is named) literally said that teenagers in 2009 were dumber than teenagers 30 years ago. call me when there's a consensus from neuroscientists about this. for that matter, call me when standardised testing is a useful measure of intelligence

As a millenial who went through the shite by the media about how much of a snowflake we are by getting offended with everything, frivolous for ordering avocado toasts for breakfasts, and clueless and unequipped when it comes to working, I ask: "who raised us?" I remember the parents' moral panic on videogames and cartoons in the 1990s and 2000s. Many kids of my generation weren't let out because the boomer and Gen X parents were made afraid by the constant news cycle of serial killers and high crime rate. And they wonder why we're so sheltered? Now, the media run by older generations are taking potshots at Gen Z claiming they are dumber. Even if that is the case, who are the ones who raised Gen Z to be constantly glued to the phone screen and watching brain rotting contents that led to lower IQ?

The next time the media complains such and such generation is behaving a certain way or being dumb, even if scientific study says so, ask yourself, who are raising these kids?

Awww, but I loved seeing headlines how I, personally, as a millennial, am killing industries. I miss those days. ;_;

Idiocracy rise

I might be wrong but I think this might be more of a failing of the US education system than an across the board decline world wide. Although I do think millenials but much more so Gen Z and Alpha are adversly affected by social media than the generations before by tv.

Republican policies are working! This is a US centric phenomena, right? Not something happening in china?

I would also say this is what happens when public transit is largely unfunded

Idiocracy is well on its way.

This is directly tied to the No Child Left Behind Act passing 25 years ago. It's been a coordinated effort to dumb down the populace and make them less informed

Now, this is awkward. Horvath said many young people remain highly confident in their intelligence despite lower measured performance. Confidence isn’t the issue. Confidence without correction stalls improvement.

Maybe they got just bored from being a test subject.

I would expect that leaded gasoline was responsible for the first gen stupider than their parents, but I have no data.

Don't blame the kids, they grew up with a vastly different environment and influences. Poor bastards have had enough problems without this shit.

So, I tried looking for any sort for any write-up, journal, or article in which Horvath details his findings or data analysis. I haven't found anything except articles referencing what he said in front of the Senate. Without that, it's impossible to tell how he determined causality.

Without completely rejecting his correlation to screen time, here are some changes I noticed between my time as a middle schooler and the past decade that I've now worked in public education:

• More advanced topics: 6th graders are now learning about photovoltaics. Not just listing it as a renewable energy, but the actual functions of photons interacting with elections. This extends to many topics that were omitted or unheard of for millennials.
• Advanced academics: classes that I'd taken as electives or as part of an advanced placement program in high school have been moved down to, or are offered in, middle school.
• Frequency of testing: when I started in public education nearly 10 years ago, students were given more standardized tests per year than there were days in a school year. And this didn't account for the district, department, or teacher-assigned tests and quizzes. The number of standardized tests have gone down a bit somewhat recently, but those dark times still affect the average standardized testing scores for the entire generation.
• Less informed teachers: remember that part about more advanced topics entering the lessons and more advanced classes being offered earlier? Well, while the lessons changed, many of the teachers didn't. That meant that teachers with outdated knowledge and concepts were attempting to teach concepts beyond their own understanding. For a while there, while older teachers tended to have better classroom control, their students' test scores were often crap compared to the younger teachers. And due to seniority and campus behavioral expectations, departmental meetings were often led by the older teachers, who emphasized control. The belief for a while was that if you could engage the students, their test scores would go up; not if you were engaging them with the wrong information, though!
• Increased stressors: younger and younger students were expected to interact with increasingly advanced technology. What went from my friends and me sharing games we programmed on our TI-83s turned into young students sending nudes from their borrowed laptops. Students were given power they weren't yet able to comprehend, because horniness is a powerful driver to kids who are being denied sex education. This led to them stressing out over the uncontrollable nature of data transfer.
• Inability to escape the past: teachers used to have to go into an office, and search through files in folders within cabinets to learn about a student's past behavior. A search like this was usually preempted by a student showing concerning behavior. Now, every incident is stored in a quickly accessible database. One that many teachers will look through to form opinions about their students before ever meeting them. This disadvantages students genuinely trying to reform their image, or escape biases based on long-since-passed choices.

Without an understanding of what Horvath was studying, I can only focus on the contributing factors that I saw. And based on those, we fucking failed those kids. All things considered, I'd say that Gen Z is performing pretty well considering how fucked they were from the start.