88
She should be disbarred, I'm serious contact https://www.americanbar.org/ now.
You’d want to contact the Florida bar where she’s licensed, not that place. But the Florida bar won’t do jack about complaints against her.
The ABA doesn't oversee an attorney's license. That is done in the state that the person got their license in (kinda like driving licenses). The ABA is merely an advisory bar that is comprised of a collective of states that serve as an advisory council to the states (think an advisory UN of sorts).
Bondi is throwing stones in glass houses when she accuses anyone of being shady about the epstein files. What an idiot.
The bitch Blondi should be in prison. Period.
Total piece of shit completely uninterested in doing her job, but is all about conducting lawfare on every one of Donvict's enemies instead. Turns out all their hand-wringing about "lawfare" was projection.
It's always projection with these assholes.
Just fucking wow
Did she actually mean "antigenocide"?
No she meant exactly what she said. Israel, and their supporters, have been pushing the narrative for over a year now that any negative comments about anything the country does are anti-Semetic. Doesn't matter how general, or specific the comment, if it is against what Israel is doing it is now anti-Semetic. They are trying to change the definition in the public mind.
And as a result of removing the differentiation between the people and the Country, making every Jewish person around the world a target to those seeking violence against the Israeli government for the genocide. Which just helps further their persecution complex, strengthening their genocidal process.
Israel, and their supporters, have been pushing the narrative for over a year now that any negative comments about anything the country does are anti-Semetic.
LOL, more like decades that they've been pushing that shit.
Used to be that worked when you had only 3 OTA networks and 3 cable networks and a handful of major newspapers that did all the gate-keeping on narratives relating to Israel.
They started to have a real problem once the rise of peer-to-peer communication reared its head. This is why they keep wanting to try to put the toothpaste back in the tube and put all the major platforms under the thumb of billionaires that will be compliant to the bullshit Israel narrative. When it comes to broadcast media, they could have an easier time than ever controlling that narrative.
She was constantly shouting various MAGA conspiracy theories at the Democrats who asked her questions and criticized her deplorable leadership of the DoJ. They obviously spent more time creating defamatory notes she could quickly refer to, than come up with actual answers for the questions she would be asked, because they know there is NO DEFENSE for her department's actions. Yelling insults like they are angry high school students at a School Board Meeting, is how MAGAs think our government should be managed.
When she was spouting off with the "who is ____ ____?" or "you don't want to talk about ____ ____" - which I assume is some bullshit talking points about certain people the fragile right wing is currently obsessed with, and I didn't even want to search Duck duck for in case that would help boost exactly what she wants to have boosted by name dropping them, I wish the Democrats shot back, sarcastically, "who is John Galt?"
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
88 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29216 readers
483 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS