303
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's insane how governments keep trying to ban encryption, even though large chunks of the economy depend on the ability to exchange encrypted data. The same with criminalizing VPNs, on which pretty much every internet-connected business depends.

[-] swnt@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago

They're learning from China

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago

It's so exhausting the constant fascist anti-privacy laws there are. You stop one, 5 more pop up in its place. Eventually some are going to pass from sheer exhaustion.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago

We fought for net neutrality for like a decade and a half and then Ajit Pai just killed it like a monarchy with supreme power and fucked off into retirement.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

That made me so mad. It was so openly botted and gaslit. Not a single human being was against it that wasn't part of a megacorp monopoly. It was just objectively bad. Just shows we straight up do not have a democracy, our votes meant nothing despite being one of the most widespread campaigns against it. I remember it was even the front page of google search to vote against it. That's how you know how bad it was.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

He received over 300,000 letters expressing support for net neutrality, complete with names, emails, physical addresses, and often phone numbers, and he dismissed all of them as spam. He knowingly voted against the will of the people for the benefit of a handful of corporations.

[-] guckfoogle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The funny part is he started working for a venture capital firm (Searchlight) after he left office that invested heavily in various isps and telcos. It's like American politicians invented the most advanced bribery system and no one even blinks an eye, this is just disgusting.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

He received over 300,000 letters expressing support for net neutrality, complete with names, emails, physical addresses, and often phone numbers, and he dismissed all of them as spam. He knowingly voted against the will of the people for the benefit of a handful of corporations.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago

This is why we need to add items to the Bill of Rights. We need to pass laws that explicitly prohibit such legislation.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I would love to see that. However that seems unlikely in the US as it is controlled by tech giants and the glowies

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 19 points 1 year ago

The RESTRICT Act...could also criminalize common practices like using a VPN or side-loading to install a prohibited app

Lol wut? They want to make it illegal for me to install software on my device?

These fuckijg Mellon head legislators should be jailed for suggesting such violations..

[-] lemzinger75@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I did my part. Thank you for posting and I encourage others to contact their representatives.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The internet poses a threat to the status quo - my local library will never stock anything written by Emma Goldman or Noam Chomsky, but, thanks to the interent, this information is pretty much at my fingertips.

They don't like that - it's far too democratic for a status quo that wants to pretend it's democratic while ensuring that we never understand the idea of democracy in any way that doesn't keep them in power and in the money.

[-] nhgeek@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Sheer dangerous idiocy. Don't just moan about this. Act! EFF makes it easy at that link and it really does make a difference.

[-] modulartable@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Disgusting! These bills never seem to end, it's insanity.

[-] Maestro@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Sad truth is they only need to succeed once. We need to succeed every damn time.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I guess we're all Margaret Thatcher now

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Seems horrible but I don't know witch county's congress we are talking about.

[-] such_fifty_bucks@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Well considering the EFF is based in the US, the second sentence of the article mentions the AMERICAN Civil Liberties Union, and halfway through the page is a link to Tell Congress which links to a page to look up your representatives with your UNITED STATES Postal Service zip code, I'm gonna let you put on your thinking cap and figure this one out.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago

They said county not country

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

United states

[-] CallumWells@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think there are any witches doing anything in a congress.

[-] guckfoogle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Remote government employees and contractors are required to use a vpn to connect to their work network. Any tech savvy business is using vpns to secure their remote employees work.

I don't know what greedy idiot came up with this bill or is lobbying for it but the only ones with vested interest in violating your privacy like this is maybe big tech and isps.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

gReAtEsT cOuNtRy iN tHe wOrLd

lEadEr oF tHe fReE wOrLd

[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Law drafts not linked?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
303 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
450 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS