1
submitted 1 year ago by DaisyLee@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Basically title, with System76 moving from gnome to their new rust built COSMIC environment what are your thoughts?

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JRepin@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

A couple of months ago our company decided to standardise on only one GNU/Linux distro and they chose PopOS. While the default desktop is better then stocj GNOME it was still far away to what I am used from the powerful, featureful and customizable KDE Plasma so after about two weeks I switched to KDE Plasma (unfortunately they have an extremely old version in their repos, but still much better).

I can only guess that Cosmic will be on pair to their current improved GNOME but will still be way lacking compared to what even an old KDE Plasma offers. And I would also much more like to see if they put more attention to keeping more updated KDE Plasma and KDE software packages in their repo. Even for Cosmic I think they would be much better of basing it on the extremely flexible and configurable KDE Plasma base and make it a heavy modification of this.

[-] DaisyLee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There is a community KDE spin in the works, with a more up to date plasma experience. https://fosstodon.org/@pop_os_kde_spin

[-] open_world@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm incredibly interested in COSMIC DE! For multiple different reasons, actually.

  1. Rust - I'm very interested to see how performant/memory-efficient this DE will be compared with other DEs. Also, I wonder how the Iced toolkit will evolve and be adopted in other projects.
  2. Benefits over GNOME - I'm looking forward to seeing how much out-of-box customizability and features come with COSMIC over GNOME (which I'm currently using).
  3. Maintainability going forward - Since the DE basically started from scratch and is using a much better language for robust software, I wonder how much easier and faster it would be to maintain the desktop environment. This potential improved maintainability could be huge in overtaking other DEs sometime soon.
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

How is rust more memory efficient than c or c++?

[-] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

It's not, perhaps they meant memory-safe?

The DE might be more memory efficient given the hindsight and freedom a fresh slate brings, but not strictly due to rust.

[-] mmstick@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's several things that make Rust more ideal for writing software that makes efficient use of resources than C or C++.

One of these is how cumbersome it is to use tagged unions in C/C++. They're integrated as a first class citizen in Rust in the form of enums, and both the standard library and all Rust projects as a whole utilize them extensively. An example would be the Cow<'a, T> type. The compiler also has some clever tricks like zero-sized types which can reduce the size of types which contain them.

On the surface, the borrowing and ownership model is useful for guaranteeing memory safety. Yet if you take that a step further, it's the perfect tool for finely optimizing resource usage with confidence. In comparison, defensive programming practices are the norm in C and C++ because resource management is risky. So applications written in Rust are more likely to be better optimized.

[-] Nuuskis@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

Hey, do you have plans to open any communities into Lemmy?

[-] mmstick@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 1 points 1 year ago

If the author of the community isn't responding, I believe you can pop a request over at https://lemmy.ml/c/community_requests to have it transferred to you.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

47953 readers
1182 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS