64
submitted 8 hours ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 hours ago

“Real Canadian Superstore has been fined $10,000 by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for what the agency says were “misleading” displays about “Product of Canada” labels.”

$10,000 is a daily rounding error for them.

[-] lemonySplit@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago

Okay so Product of Canada means 98%+ of ingredients from Canada, and processed here. Made in Canada is a lower bar with some (49%?) imported ingredients allowed with a qualifying statement, and the last major transformation has to take place in Canada.

Sounds like their polling shows people are still confused.

Time to adopt the Aussie labelling style for Made in Canada stuff so it clearly shows the percentage of imported ingredients in a nice clear graphic on the packaging.

[-] Quokka@quokk.au 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It’s not simple here either.

[-] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Ah. A whole 0.0016% of their daily profit, or about two minutes worth of profit. (Source)

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That is not nearly enough.

When you do this, you have to look at how much they actually sold.

  • Subpoena them for sales data
  • Look at products with fake labels vs with labels vs US non-labelled.
  • Run a regression analysis that incorporates the product type and price.
  • Use differerences between true label increases, US decreases, and estimate the ACTUAL sales
  • Fine them for that plus 50-100%, and a flat fee.

And I know this is not going to be a small amount of data to work with, I would volunteer my time just to do this analysis, and as part of the fine they should just be able to use Loblaws Digital's servers, with an NDA to certify they won't disclose anything not related.

[-] Little_mouse@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

Seems like a lot of math they could argue.

Fine them daily gross income for each identified product for each day since the last inspection with no findings.

Make them beg for more frequent inspections.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

Aye, I could accept that. 

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
64 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11584 readers
865 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS