537
submitted 5 days ago by meldrik@lemmy.wtf to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dudesss@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago

As an alternative, if you wanted something less secure, and more ethical, consider buying a Fairphone. However GrapheneOS does not support Fairphone at this moment.

https://www.fairphone.com/

[-] jayrar@lemy.lol 8 points 4 days ago

/e/os and lineage is support fairphone, you can have both

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yaroto98@lemmy.world 78 points 5 days ago

Bring on support for more devices, and I'll likely switch with my next phone.

[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 38 points 5 days ago

They're working on an alternative device with a large OEM they've not disclosed yet. They're aiming at releasing it in 2027.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] gravitas@lem.ugh.im 25 points 5 days ago

Its not up to grapheneos devs which devices support bootloader relocking with different keys, literally only pixels allow this and without it you cant properly secure the phone.

[-] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 38 points 5 days ago

..without it you cant properly secure the phone.

My understanding is that a locked bootloader helps protect against evil maid attacks and bootloader-level malware persistence. I find this a security risk that I would absolutely take for Google independence. "Properly secure" is subjective.

GrapheneOS do decide what phones they support. It is exactly their choice to support only Google Pixels, rather than taking a security hit for hardware independence (whether you agree with the decision or not).

[-] yaroto98@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Exactly, seems like this should be up to the consumer. The devs can say: pixels have best security, here's a 2nd and 3rd option, here's their pros and cons.

Because as much as I approve of privacy measures and security, my phone doesn't have any lock screen. No pin, no biometrics, nothing.

I work from home, I don't really travel, I have 4 children. Physical security is annoying. I want grapheneos for data security. I don't have people trying to steal my phone, I do have people constantly stealing my data.

And without a non-pixel option (fuck google), I'm likely to go for to a competitor because, while their data security might not be as good as graphene, it is better than what I currently have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 38 points 5 days ago

pixels are unobtanium where i live. i wish there could be graphene on more phones.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I have a Galaxy S22. How do I do that?

Yeah no we regular folk are stranded on corpo beach. And all the coconuts have candy crush running inside.

[-] cass27@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Sorry bud. GrapheneOS specifically requires an OEM unlockable Google Pixel phone

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 7 points 3 days ago

LineageOS or similar alternatives

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 7 points 4 days ago

I don’t think you can 😫

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
537 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

46637 readers
310 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS