58
You sure, Discord? (discord.com)
submitted 13 hours ago by ewpert@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago

The enshitification will continue until morale improves.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 37 points 12 hours ago

Lip service

For 90%+ of users, nothing changes. Most users never access age-restricted content or change their default safety settings. For those who do, we have an internal system that works to accurately determine your age.

"accurately" my ass.

We know many of you believe the right answer is not to do this at all. We hear you.

You obviously don't.

the security incident last year involving our third-party customer service provider only adds to that skepticism. To be clear, we do not use that vendor for age assurance. In fact, we no longer work with them at all, and we've taken the lessons from that incident seriously.

You obviously haven't.

We heard you, and we want to get this right. So here's what's happening: We’re delaying our global rollout to the second half of 2026.

We’re listening.

LOL you aren't.

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

I'm without question one of the 90% and I never thought they were going to require it for everyone. But I don't like the idea that an algorithm is constantly writing a dossier about me to determine my "age" because I wasn't fucking born yesterday.

Open source your shit and make it auditable or I'm not fucking using it anymore.

[-] dendrite_soup@lemmy.ml 2 points 33 minutes ago

The 'internal system that accurately determines your age' line is doing a lot of work. What it's describing is behavioral age inference — classifying users by activity patterns, message timing, content signals, server membership. That's the mechanism behind the 90% claim: they already have enough behavioral signal on most users that they don't need to ask. The disclosure buried in the blog post is that continuous behavioral profiling is already running. ID verification would have been a one-time check. This is permanent. The 'we won't collect your ID' framing is technically accurate and completely misleading.

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago

Sounds promising but still not convincing.

[-] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 26 points 13 hours ago

I didn't read it nor do I care too. nothing from companies/corporations sounds promising anymore. it's all lies. I have zero reason to trust companies since they continuously keep lighting the bridge on fire then apologize for lighting it on fire to then light another fire next to it.

[-] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 12 hours ago

I did, you can tell it’s frightened

[-] RedWedding@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 12 hours ago

It read like utter marketing nonsense

[-] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 8 points 12 hours ago

We hear you

Yeah I bet you do.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
58 points (96.8% liked)

Privacy

46570 readers
722 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS