27
submitted 21 hours ago by Zapados@sh.itjust.works to c/world@quokk.au
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dominic.borcea@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Out of all the feasible outcomes from today's point of view, Pahlavi might be the least bad one, which is why I don't think its going to happen.
More feasible seems to be a situation in which the IRGC&co continue with their occupation of the country and USA/Israel strike some kind of deal with a new ayatollah (which for now seems to be the old one's son, go figure). Either that or the conflict continues for X time and it gradually simmers down, no deal struck.
Very unfortunate reality for Iranians, I'm afraid.

[-] atropa@piefed.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Son of mass murder sjah ,new president of Iran ? Are you nuts ?

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago

7 seconds into the article:

It features seven people, among them lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi and leaders of other parties and organisations opposing the Islamic Republic of Iran, such as the 7 Aban Front, the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan, and the communist Tudeh Party.

[-] atropa@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

Its to the people of Iran to deside, not the puppets from murica of europe

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

Is he the son of the Iranian slaughterer or a European puppet? Pick a lane.

[-] atropa@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

I think ,.. both

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago

That is also mentioned in the article about 12 seconds in:

politicians in Brussels recognising that it is Iranians who should choose their new leaders, and not the European Union's job to endorse specific contenders.

[-] atropa@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Seriuse question, do you always read all articles with a stopwatch next to you, you are the first person I meet now who does this, reason?

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 4 points 9 hours ago

It's just to illustrate how little effort it takes to actually read the thing instead of reacting to the headline with points the article already addresses.

[-] atropa@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago

Point taken

[-] myrmidex@belgae.social 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Out with the old, in with the ... older?

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
27 points (96.6% liked)

World News

1864 readers
820 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS