36

Does the United States have a spending problem? Obviously, but I really wanted to talk about how the cost of living crisis is presenting itself in your community. That relates to this article because you can't squeeze blood from a stone. If all of you have no disposable income, no savings, and a job market that can't support your current cost of living... What happens if you lose your job? Do you default on loan obligations along with America because we are stretched to the edge. Should we vote in members of congress to pass more tax breaks for private jets?Are mods whack? Let me know in the comments.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Seems like the US consumer is stuck between a government with drunk spending, and a ton of debt. Next to a corporation who's squeezed every last penny out of people between wages and costs of goods and services. If GDP is to increase enough to pay off the debt, how does that happen? The only GDP growth comes from sucking up wages and monopolizing, and good old government spending.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

the US consumer is stuck between a government with drunk spending, and a ton of debt

don't forget... bilionaires play for free.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Just wait until people stop lending money to the US.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

that's the day when they stop trading with us, and mango seems to be working hard on bringing that day.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

So does the national debt matter or does it not?

[-] firelight@startrek.website -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Kind of. The US won't collapse due to its debt, but the dollar will be devalued as money is being printed to pay it back.

This is why Democrats love deficit spending. They get to obscure the true cost of social welfare programs and ensure that workers foot the bill instead of the people making everything so expensive.

[-] justalittleguy@lemdro.id 3 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats love deficit spending, which is why Republicans historically are the ones that increase the deficit more.

[-] man_wtfhappenedtoyou@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

WE. DECLARE. BANKRUPTCY.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

I am out of work but old. I have savings that has gotten me by but it will run out. As incredibly bad and stupid as it would be I kinda hope trump does something to allow people to pull from retirement accounts before retirement without getting fees. Its the kind of relief he would do where it helps for the short term and completely fucks you for the long. When it comes to a roof over you head having it today is more useful than ten years from now. It will let some skate for awhile. Maybe I can get a 40 year mortgage.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully the social security kicks in soon, or you're not that old! If you're looking to buy a house I think there are some tax loopholes for using retirement savings. I'm sure trump and his cronies would also love to relieve you of your retirement in some diabolical way. So I'm guessing your job market is fucked too?

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

yeah and unfortunately im not that old. just into my 50's so to far from retirement but definately a minus when job hunting along with being unemployed for over a year now. its like two strikes. I mean they won't say that outright. honestly like anything when you look at how fucked so many people are I know im not getting the worst of it.

[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Its almost like this Trump chap doesn't pay any attention to due debts.

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Caaaaaaaarrrrrl

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Mods don't want us discussing what our back up plans are for job loss. But if you lost your job today, what job would you apply to on indeed, and would there be enough money from that job to pay your current bills? Do you think there is security in your job market if you lose your job?

[-] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Mods also don’t want us talking about assassinating the entire Trump administration

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Lmao is that what got removed from my last post? Im trying to gauge sentiment here and this is a reading.

[-] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t know about your post history. But the mods on .world are very pro-government.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean im pro government too. Order is one of the bonuses of living in a society.

[-] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

So, which government do you like?

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I sure do enjoy a democracy even if I have to vote with glass lickers.

[-] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

So do you want to answer the question or just avoid it? Specifically, which government do you simp for…. Like the mods…

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 3 weeks ago

So do you like the genocide party of the genocide+ party?

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I voted for killer Kamala but she was not blood thirsty enough 😩

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I was a fan of Biden actually, I know that’s a controversial take on here. I thought he was a good US president. A lot of people don’t think he was a good president because they don’t understand that a president doesn’t make laws.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 3 weeks ago

But a president can bypass laws to ship arms to a country committing genocide!

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

No… congress made the laws to ship the bombs. They created the money to facilitate the transfer.

Remember when all us kind people wanted to send F-16s to Ukraine and it never happened. Your congressman loves sending guns to Israel. I bet you won’t vote them out this year. I bet you’re too dumb.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 3 weeks ago

False.

Going around Congress, the Biden administration said Saturday it has approved the emergency sale to Israel of nearly 14,000 rounds of tank ammunition worth more than $106 million as Israel intensifies its military operations in the southern Gaza Strip.

The State Department approves the sale of tank ammunition to Israel in a deal that bypasses Congress - AP News, 9th December

For the second time this month the Biden administration is bypassing Congress to approve an emergency weapons sale to Israel as Israel continues to prosecute its war against Hamas in Gaza under increasing international criticism.

Biden administration again bypasses Congress for weapons sale to Israel - The Guardian, 29th December

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I stand corrected! Now remind me; was Hamas holding a bunch of American hostages when that was written?

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 3 weeks ago

Irrelevant goal post moving.

The reason stated by the Biden administration was "The United States is committed to the security of Israel, and it is vital to US national interests to ensure Israel is able to defend itself against the threats it faces" it was to protect Israel, nothing to do with American hostages.

Some Democratic lawmakers have spoken of making the proposed $14.3 billion in American assistance to its Mideast ally contingent on concrete steps by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to reduce civilian casualties in Gaza during the war with Hamas.

Congress was going to ask Israel to maybe do a little bit less genocide. Biden said fuck that and went around them to do as he pleases.

Biden was a genocide enabling president and that makes Biden a bad president.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

So stop issuing bonds. They’re unnecessary in a fiat currency.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 3 weeks ago

Other states have been dumping bonds at unprecedented levels and investing in BRICS.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 3 weeks ago
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

China is investing in China?

And?

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 3 weeks ago

You want the government to stop issuing bonds. If states are dumping them, there's an inference there, somewhere.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I don't really care about the national debt. The OP is worried about national debt. One way to fix that (if it bothers you) is to stop issuing debt. As bonds mature and aren't replaced, no more debt.

What does it matter if "states" are dumping bonds? Who does it hurt if they sell bonds at a loss? Or a profit? What's the inference?

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 3 weeks ago

If the USA can't pay it's debts, we can't trade. Everyone should care about the national debt. It's not coming out of the billionaires' bank accounts, and multinational corporations will simply do business elsewhere. We don't have the infrastructure to produce internally, and if our credit score degrades enough, we won't be able to build it, either.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, you don’t understand money.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 3 weeks ago
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You’re the one who said “if we can’t pay our debts we can’t trade.” That’s nonsense on its face. You need to explain that to me.

Meanwhile, I’ll waste cycles attempting to explain modern monetary theory on a phone keyboard.

Fiat currency is just numbers. Ones and zeros. The Fed(eral Reserve) can simply type these numbers into existence. That’s where the currency comes from. China can buy treasuries, but in a fiat system it’s unnecessary. Money comes from The Fed. The government could close the bond window tomorrow and it would just mean China would put its money in a bank account. Or, you know, spend it on things sold in dollars. Which is what currency issuance for.

Treasuries are a relic of the gold standard when currency was federally required to be tied to some quantity of shiny rocks. It was discarded because it artificially constrained monetary policy. E.g. during wars, the government couldn’t legally print currency, which is why there were all those silly war bonds.

Now the only constraint on issuing currency (really) is inflation. As we are about to find out, inflation is more than just currency issuance. Oil shocks, pandemic-induced supply chain crunches, and avian influenza outbreaks can raise inflation without any change in currency supply.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29093 readers
618 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS