10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml to c/autism@lemmy.ml

When I make people feel wrong I feel really really really really really bad and it sticks with me forever

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I try to be gracious about it, because I want to make it easy for them to keep doing it in the future

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Graciousness is too regal. How do I let them know I obtained the knowledge by trawling through the great swamps without admitting to wasting one's time. That I don't even deserve to have thoughts

[-] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago
[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Have you figured out how to accept compliments?

[-] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Same way. Theory doesn't always immediately translate to praxis, though. For those who started innerstanding late (myself), it will be a lifetime exercise in honing the ability.

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

https://annas-archive.pk/md5/f6b31a8dafd6bd39a5986833e66293e6

There is precious little theory I have been going off of stuff like this (best in its class I have found) and Andrew Carnegie's great manual of professional sociopathy (How to Win Friends). This one is great but it incessantly tries to convince the reader that we can achieve social change by collectively being more true to ourselves without proper organization. Frankly you have to invert much of the advice and use it to mask even harder, but I don't hold it against the author, since that is what all NGO activism for minority groups is oriented towards.

[-] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Andrew Carnegie’s great manual of professional sociopathy (How to Win Friends). This one is great but it incessantly tries to convince the reader that we can achieve social change by collectively being more true to ourselves without proper organization.

"Professional sociopathy” is exactly correct, and I refuse to read it beyond the first chapter I already read, decades ago. It teaches how to be fake af, and that's the problem. It teaches how to be true to our basest instincts (ID) and not to the better parts of ourselves, which leads to misery for self and others. That's why rich sociopaths are never beyond superficially happy, without ever having found the satisfaction of striving to be our best selves, the true selves that long to be free, and it's exactly why the world is a mess.

Frankly you have to invert much of the advice and use it to mask even harder, but I don’t hold it against the author, since that is what all NGO activism for minority groups is oriented towards.

For all the righteous hate Jung gets, he is bang on in his theory of archetypes (at least for those of us who spent primary socialization and beyond), and shadow. And shadow work is the only thing that has managed to lead me near approximation of my better self, the self that longs for liberation from the prison of my most base instinctive drives. US culture teaches us immediate gratification is desirable, but it's superficial, and fleeting. Delayed gratification requires hard work and patience, and not least of all maintenance. But the rewards last, as long as we do the work.

Your results may vary, since I'm not familiar with your upbringing or culture. I wish I had something more substantial to offer you.

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I think you're right on the money as usual, not at all insubstantial to me. I do have complicated feelings on Jung lol he gets incredibly esoteric and evil but some of it rules. How to Win Friends is a good way to know what to expect from people who view life as a zero sum class war, that's about it.

[-] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

If seems his red book traces his descent into madness and his ability to reason his way out of it, but that's an extremely superficial understanding on my part.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago

"imagine what the next thing will be".

Be happy/excited for them they've taken a small step out from under the shadow of ignorance and into the light of knowledge. You helped them do that.

Sometimes it's like ripping off a plaster. A brief discomfort for the greater good.

not all, but many NTs tend to see that (post-"victory" happiness) as smugness or gloating, etc.

it's not wrong to enjoy or to be optimistic for the other person, but they may sometimes feel that they've been defeated and which is often considered intrinsically a bad thing, or as a type of unwarranted aggression. so positivity after that can be interpreted as bad manners, cruelty, rudeness, any number of negative things.

all I'm saying is, it pays to proceed cautiously if you value the relationship.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

Indeed. It's specific to the situation, every time

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Oh that's good I just stare at people. Is that good?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

to crush your enemies
see them driven before you
and to hear the lamentation of their women

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Have you figured out how to accept compliments?

I'm not saying i have the answer to this, but i also worry about damaging the relationship in those cases. so i instinctively end up trying to validate something about the other's words, their situation, their values, the thought process which led then to their initial argument, or anything else i can think of. something like

  • "but i can totally understand how someone would feel that way (their initial position) considering (reasons)"
  • or "but what do i know, I've never (had certain relevant experience)"

if I'm honest i feel super awkward doing so after having argued/debated against their side. and I'm always afraid they'll call me out as a hypocrite, a pedantic simp, or just a plain idiot who doesn't pay attention to my own words....

and much of the time, the other person ignores my effort. at least that's no worse than if i didn't say anything extra.

but sometimes, their expression will change from confused/irritated to relieved. or they'll confirm that they were convinced by me and don't resent what I've said. so it can work.

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Have you figured out how to accept compliments?

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

That one is easy: Say thank you with a Mona Lisa-smile, then go on about your day.

It's a pure formalism, because any interpretation of what they said, how they said it, of your own thoughts or feelings on it, is 100% pure speculation. Thus you simply accept it formally with a mild smile and a "thank you" and leave everything else (thinking about it, discussing it, etc.) for a later time.

It's very similar to how you're supposed to take/accept criticism.

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I AM NOT MAKING THE SMUG ANIME FACE

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

Autism

361 readers
1 users here now

A community for Autism.

Rules

  1. Posts should be relevant to Autism.

Resources

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS