188
submitted 10 months ago by spaceghoti@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 139 points 10 months ago

Annual reminder that it’s now been 14 years since Hannity promised to be waterboarded for charity.

He talks a big game, but that’s all it is – and his talk gets cheaper by the day.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

This was the comment I came to see.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Wait we had the chance to waterboard him and we didn't take it?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's right, I was going to mention the same. All these would-be tough guys are all alike.

[-] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 54 points 10 months ago

Id say let’s put him up for a test then.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 points 10 months ago

Send him into the woods in Maine!

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

And leave him there!

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 39 points 10 months ago

If that's the case why do we need guns?

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 14 points 10 months ago

And why isn't he in Maine?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

Hannity taking this guy down with his epic martial arts skills on live TV could be bigger than Geraldo opening Capone's safe

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but depraved as TV has a reputation for being, there's still a bit of a taboo against showing someone getting turned into pink mist on live TV.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Live, maybe, but I know of at least one instance of it happening on a TV show

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

But Pay Per View on the other hand....

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I'd watch it on PPV

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 months ago

This would have been my immediate response too. “I guess we don’t need guns, just sweet martial arts skills”

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

Hannity should challenge Steven Seagal to a fight. Winner becomes king of the douchebags.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I like to think they both shit themselves and it's called a draw.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago

A single round from an AR15 can amputate a limb.

Good luck, fuckface.

[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

It could also amputate nearly a whole Sean Hannity from an otherwise perfectly serviceable limb.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Crucially, it can do so at hundreds of yards distance. Which is longer than his reach, last time I saw him on TV.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

I dunno. He is certainly reaching with this whole kung-fu master bullshit.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 25 points 10 months ago

I heard he did so well when he was water boarded.

[-] Lucz1848@lemmy.ca 20 points 10 months ago

He also said he could handle waterboarding, but has never had the plums to put that to the test.

This is simply another instance of Sean Hannity writing checks with his mouth that his ass can't cash.

Quite frankly, I doubt that he could handle an unarmed assailant.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 9 points 10 months ago

He also said he could handle waterboarding, but has never had the plums to put that to the test

At least Christopher Hitchens put his money where his mouth is and changed his mind immediately.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That was immediately respect-worthy. He emerged from it traumatized, even by the brief experience, and said it was absolutely, 100% torture.

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I'm imagining it going something like this.

[-] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

What about the people who can't afford to be dry humped by a Brazilian trying to break their arm three times a week?

[-] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 5 points 10 months ago

Don’t break a hip talking out the side of your neck you elderly trilobite

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I'm pretty sure he and many of his ilk talk shit like this strictly so they will be quoted in the news and thus stay in the public eye.

[-] Octavio@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I urge him to try.

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Lol goddamn...

[-] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

And if he goes after a mass shooter in the hall with his martial arts skills, he will end up a bloody mess riddled with bullet holes on the floor.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

Which is how we can be assured that he will never put this claim to the test.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Hannity has never struck me as someone with even the slightest bit of intelligence. I'm sure he was chosen for his role because he was telegenic enough and could spout all the politically correct conservative talking points that Limbaugh was saying on the radio.

[-] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago
[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In the aftermath of a mass shooting in Maine that left at least 18 dead and a dozen injured — with the suspected killer still at large — the usual prescriptions for America’s epidemic of gun violence have been rolled out once more.

Indeed, because the political right is beholden to Second Amendment absolutists who regard even the hint of increased gun regulation as an attack on the Constitution, they are always in the awkward positions of suggesting other, baffling ways to theoretically prevent another AR-15 massacre.

So, talking with presidential candidate Nikki Haley on his show last night, Fox News host Sean Hannity pivoted to an alternate form of protection: bare fists.

Once he’d complained that shootings are routinely “politicized” — something Fox surely has nothing to do with — Hannity turned the threat of being gunned down in a public space into an issue of personal responsibility.

But his absurd comment reaffirms the core delusion of gun-rights advocates who resist any common-sense reform of firearm laws: that if only these horrific attacks unfolded in just the right circumstances, with a perfectly prepared hero in the vicinity, they wouldn’t add up to the deadly pattern we recognize as an ongoing national crisis.

The cruel irony of this take is how it demands you imagine yourself with superpowers while presuming the government — which is actually in a position to mitigate gun violence on a societal scale — is somehow helpless to act.


The original article contains 601 words, the summary contains 243 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

“I always ask the question, when something like this happens, what is your plan? What do you do?” he said. “I have a personal security plan. I train in mixed martial arts.”

Actual quote was left out. Bad bot!

[-] Birdie@thelemmy.club 1 points 10 months ago

I know my mixed martial arts stop bullets.

/s

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He can't even be waterboarded

Fucking loser.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Everybody knows he’s being trained to be a cage fighter by Rex KwonDo… gosh!!!

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You think anyone wants a roundhouse while I'm wearing these babies????? Forget about it!

[-] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I thought they said "only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun"?

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
188 points (93.9% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3836 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS