323
Homelessness (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 weeks ago by cm0002@libretechni.ca to c/mop@quokk.au
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] diverging@piefed.social 41 points 2 weeks ago

Brutalism was just a style of that time. It's not left wing architecture.

[-] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 weeks ago

Most importantly they were cheap and fast to build, that's why there are so many of them. Unfortunately most houses didn't fare that well into the 21st century

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

They're literally famous for low quality and inferior materials being used due to corruption in the supply chain. The design is solid, the execution was not.

That said, still better than homelessness, and arguably a big reason behind the high rates of home ownership in Eastern Europe.

[-] Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com 31 points 2 weeks ago

This guy has never see the suburbs

[-] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

Or the most soul crushing 20-30 floor apartment complexes that have the vibes of an anthill

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Just another example of depressing left wing architecture. Oh wait, thats a suburb in Cincinnati...

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalist architecture built a Chase bank near me that looks exactly like the Chipotle across the street: A boring gray and black box.

Most buildings corporations have built or retrofitted for the past decade or so look like they were designed by prison architects.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

There’s a bunch of new townhomes a little further away that look like exactly like a prison.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 2 weeks ago

Conservatives have a solution. They just don’t want to say what it is.

[-] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

same for liberals

[-] brownsugga@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Left wing architecture brought us Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village

Originally (1947) prioritized for WWII vets (and very much just for white people for like a while after it was built), the development today has some of the most sought after rental apartments in the entire city, cause it's a great place for community

11k apartments from 14th st to 23rd st, 1st ave to ave C

Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuyvesant_Town%E2%80%93Peter_Cooper_Village

[-] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It also gave us Pruitt-Igoe…

I think execution is a lot more important than the architectural style in the success or failure of projects in that era

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

Also, you know what I care about? The quality of the building and the inside of my apartment. You give me an ugly concrete building and let me deal with what's inside the walls of my place, no worries! I'd rather have reinforced concrete that will last my lifetime than particle board that won't last two decades.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

State owned housing is yet another tendril the state uses to control people. When the powerful control your basic necessities like food and shelter, they basically control whether you live or die. And when they control whether you live or die, they control you completely. Not too different from capitalism, really, except the people dying are dissidents instead of the poor.

Thankfully, humans are actually quite adept at obtaining or constructing their own food and shelter. It's only the violence of the state that prevents them from doing so. Once we solve that issue there will be little to no hunger or homelessness as there are many possible solutions to these problems.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

This actually looks amazing, well designed city blocks with ample public space and green areas. Furthermore a lot of leftist architecture is transit oriented and walkable. New Jersey can learn a lot from this, hell if they had this instead of endless sprawl it would actually be a good state to live in.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Those were not amazing to live in. There were often no shops, no restaurants, no culture, no nothing. And the buildings had extremely thin walls, there was no privacy, you could hear everything the neighbours were doing. It's possible to reconstruct them to make them quite nice and livable, but they were not designed that way from the beginning. It WAS depressing. The problems were not caused by it being leftist, though. It was the shitty totalitarian regime with central planning and absurdly incompetent leaders.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

ahh yes, the aesthetic beauty that is endless suburbs is preferable

[-] OldGrayDog@fedinsfw.app 0 points 2 weeks ago

That's in China and hardly anyone actually lives there. I don't remember the whole story, but it's kind of a waste.

[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Look at the bottom. The golden thing is a top of a basic orthodox church. It's ex USSR.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
323 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1431 readers
1987 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS