44

Readme updated today:

This repository is no longer actively maintained.  

The TrueNAS build system previously hosted here has been moved to an internal infrastructure. This transition was necessary to meet new security requirements, including support for Secure Boot and related platform integrity features that require tighter control over the build and signing pipeline.  

No further updates, pull requests, or issues will be accepted. Existing content is preserved here for historical reference only.  

https://github.com/truenas/scale-build

Wondering if this is just the first step towards doing a minio in the future.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yaroto98@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Always blaming security bullshit. I anxiously await a community fork.

Next step is requiring a subscription.

[-] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Volker Theile (lead dev of FreeNAS 2006-2009) maintaines OpenMediaVault, based on debian, version 8 was released recently. Not a drop in replacement, and it has its own quirks, but no evil company in the background

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I'm running an early version of that on a 16 year old ARM board NAS, the NAS has 256MB of RAM and OpenMediaVault runs great on it.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 week ago

Looks like no zfs support?

[-] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not in there by default, you have to install the omv extras plugin, from there you can install zfs: https://wiki.omv-extras.org/doku.php?id=omv8%3Aomv8_plugins%3Azfs

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

I question why this gets recommended so much when we discuss truenas.

Without a doubt zfs is one of if not THE reason to go truenas. It does so much more for you than other filesystems.

I guess OMV at least has btrfs but not the same thing.

[-] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

ZFS is in the omv extras repo: https://wiki.omv-extras.org/doku.php?id=omv8%3Aomv8_plugins%3Azfs

As it's just plain debian under the hood you can use any basic debian stuff, e.g. I use zfs-auto-snapshot from apt, and the zfs plugin can list and manage the snapshots perfectly.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Ahhh that is good to know. Thank you.

[-] SteveTech@aussie.zone 20 points 1 week ago

I found a post on the forum:

https://forums.truenas.com/t/scale-build-git-repo-going-closed-source/64313

This is only their old build system which they weren't using themselves, the rest of the OS will remain open source. However they also said some worrying stuff about including "proprietary pieces of the OS".

[-] nixx@piefed.ca 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

XigmaNAS is still being developed and is a fork of the original FreeNAS code before iX acquired the name.

There are alternatives

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Truenas went to shit when they killed BSD support, the OS it was founded on

[-] lnxtx@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

TIL. Now it's based on Debian.

[-] Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I ordered a TrueNAS system from iXsystems a few years ago, and the reasoning they gave me is that Linux has better driver support, especially for home users.

Whether that was actually the reason, I have no clue. But that’s what they said.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

The reason they gave me is people can run apps with docker on Linux, and docker isn't compatible with FreeBSD jails...

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

And yet they went with K3s at first, a crappy implementation at that, and refused to even consider adding Docker for like a year, then suddenly it became super important to replace their k3s stack with docker in the next release, barely giving people 2-3 months to get all their apps updated.

[-] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not only that but there wasn't even a notification on the dashboard for me after updating the OS that k3s were being replaced, I found out after updating when my apps wouldn't work. When did I update? About 2 weeks after the migration deadline. Had to rebuild my Plex, Jellyfin and Immich apps.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like notifications from the OS developer in my system, but that would've been a great heads up and a worthy exception. "Hey migrate your apps now or your shit will break" would've worked.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

K3S sorta makes sense in an enterprise environment but for the small one box use case it's overkill and a pain to work with for little extra gain.

Security through obscurity isn't security.

There goes my excuse for not giving up and just paying for Unraid.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Unraid pay system switch made me never want to use them

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

you can always just bypass their security.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago

So glad I went with OpenMediaVault so many years ago

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

Oh so they are going to use the Puppet excuse to move away from open source?

we must move to have our code internal only for now. Totally just for security reasons nothing to do with us also changing licensing to make it harder for those building things for us

no don't bring up the security incident we're referring to that shows us as the issue not having code visible! (ie they cheaped out on people/set up and vendor had keys visible)

[-] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Odd choice of timing… I wonder if they are sitting on a cache of hard drives.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are they lying about secure boot being a reason or can I go back to thinking SB is part of Microsoft's EEE attack on software freedom?

[-] Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

@tabular @Ek-Hou-Van-Braai They are lying. Debian supports Secure Boot and remains open.

Although "related platform integrity" stuff might be something they're being forced to include by a government agency or paid to include by another company.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

It can be a bit of both.

I don't think secureboot is an attack on freedom exactly (and it's certainly not an instance of EEE), but I definitely think it shouldn't be Microsoft holding the keys.

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Literally today Chris Titus released a video where he emphasized that no one should be using secure boot because the default backend is Microsoft and no one changes their secure boot config.

If that's true there's an argument that the name "secure boot" is hardly detachable from the defaults and thus that name is kid of burnt and shouldn't be recommended out of an abundance of caution for new users.

[-] LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 week ago

Damn man. Technology kinda fucking sucks now. Everything I use is imploding in on itself. Yay!

[-] Analog@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Not Proxmox! Use it for free at home, but buy it for your business if you can! (But they never force you to)

/hoping it doesn’t bite the dust too

[-] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Why are they always coming up with some kind of bullshit excuse? :D

[-] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
LTT Linus Tech Tips YouTube channel
NAS Network-Attached Storage
PIA Private Internet Access brand of VPN
VPN Virtual Private Network
ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity

6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 10 acronyms.

[Thread #153 for this comm, first seen 10th Mar 2026, 00:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
44 points (97.8% liked)

Selfhosted

57665 readers
91 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS