172
submitted 2 months ago by maplesaga@lemmy.world to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Espitemophiliac@piefed.ca 56 points 2 months ago
[-] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just to put that in perspective, that's enough to pay around a $1 million dollar annual salary to each of these 84,000 lost jobs, or to pay $100,000 salary and still keep 90% for themselves.

Are they rich enough yet? Or do they still need more?

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Enough is never enough

[-] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

All for taxing the rich more, but you're conflating wealth and income here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Oh thank goodness. At least they're okay.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 months ago

I know. Here I was worried about how the oligarchs may have to tighten their belt like the rest of us.

[-] dudesss@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

Maplesaga coming in hot with some morphed form of degenerate racism.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

You can always tell people living with no coast.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago
[-] ieGod@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

The government says the measures are necessary in parts of the country where businesses are struggling to find the people they need.

"Canadians must always be first in line for available jobs, but in some rural regions employers are facing persistent labour shortages," said Jobs and Families Minister Patty Hajdu in a statement included in the news release outlining the measures.

We have people, clearly, as our jobless numbers show. People want to work. The woman quoted in the article feels desperate.

So the only other explanation is that they aren't offering proper compensation.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago
[-] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Which part? They're not stating any opinion, just reporting facts.

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Could be. On the other hand, I agree with the article.

[-] ieGod@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

Which part? They’re not stating any opinion, just reporting facts.

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

What Zahra says. I think she's right. I could be wrong, I don't have evidence I can use to support my position.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
172 points (93.4% liked)

Canada

12015 readers
581 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS