190
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 108@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago

They wanted to hang you dude

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t be celebrating this. The reason why he’s not getting traction is because he didn’t help overthrow the US government. That’s a terrifying reason for him to lose.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 1 year ago

He was never popular. He was a useful tool for trump to help court the religious vote. When it became clear they were supporting him despite his obvious non religious demeanor, pence served no purpose to the cult or to non cult Republicans. Sure, it was terrifying it got so close to a couple. But even without a coup or attempts to kill him, he was never a viable candidate.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Biden was likewise not popular but being vice president allowed him to leverage Obama’s reputation to the presidency. We will never know what happens in the counterfactual where Pence enters the primaries without having “betrayed” Trump. But frankly, I find these super confident post-facto predictions irksome.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Biden didn't get the presidency due to Obama's good reputation, but rather as an 'anyone but Trump' vote based on Trump's history and reputation.

No, we can only speculate. As you are, lol.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That’s ridiculous. Of course Biden benefited from being Obama’s VP.

I am advocating for uncertainty. You are confidently saying that Pence was never going to win. Yours is over-confident speculation and mine isn’t.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, of course he benefitted. He also benefitted from being a known quantity. It is not what won the election, though.

Trump lost the election, not Biden winning. An empty paper cup would likely have won if it was the alternative candidate.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

"Turns out, the people who wanted to hang me two years ago won't vote for me. Who'd of thought?"

[-] NinePeedles@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

*Who'd have thought

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Alternative headline: "Pence discovers the Republican Party is full of Republicans"

[-] agentsquirrel@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not a Republican and I don't agree with Pence on anything, but he could have gained traction if he actually grew a spine and got the GOP back on the tracks by standing up against Trump and taking a conservative morals and values tact. He simply didn't, and politically he got exactly what he deserved. This is the problem with every other conservative Christian candidate. At the end of the day their Christian values are just worthless drivel.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

Values are worthless and they present no solutions.

[-] waigl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

As bland and featureless as this guy is, I wouldn't be surprised if he also fails to gain literal traction when literally running.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He just couldn't seem to get his feet under him. The noose must have been too high.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 8 points 1 year ago

Mike Pence of the "Hang Mike Pence" fame? I suppose it's hard to build momentum with a party that thinks the one principled action he took was an act of betrayal.

[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

If Pence had owned stopping Trump and telling everyone what Trump did while trying to destroy democracy he may have had a chance as a hero. But he didn't. He tried to still suck up to Trump and that didn't work. Trump turned on him.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah if he actually very loudly went against Trump he'd distinguish himself from the others. Instead he blends in as a milquetoast evangelical saying "harder daddy"

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Please clap.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


NEW YORK (AP) — Former Vice President Mike Pence is dropping his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, ending his campaign for the White House after struggling to raise money and gain traction in the polls.

“After much prayer and deliberation, I have decided to suspend my campaign for president effective today,” Pence said at the Republican Jewish Coalition gathering in Las Vegas.

(tldr: 2 sentences skipped)

The decision, more than two months before the Iowa caucuses that he had staked his campaign on, saves Pence from the embarrassment of failing to qualify for the third Republican primary debate, Nov. 8 in Miami.

(tldr: 4 sentences skipped)

Throughout his campaign, the former Indiana governor and congressman had insisted that while he was well-known by voters, he was not “known well” and set out to change that with an aggressive schedule that included numerous stops at diners and Pizza Ranch restaurants.

Pence had been betting on Iowa, a state with a large white Evangelical population that has a long history of elevating religious and socially conservative candidates such as former Arkansas Gov.

(tldr: 1 sentences skipped)

Pence often campaigned with his wife, Karen, a Christian school teacher, and emphasized his hard-line views on issues such as abortion, which he opposes even in cases when a pregnancy is unviable.

(tldr: 4 sentences skipped)


The original article contains 508 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

"Tapioca pudding stops trying to be America's favorite dessert"

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

He has a lot of testifying to do as a witness in trumps crimes anyway.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Now that he's dropping out, I wonder if he still thinks he has a career in politics or he now becomes critical of trump? I suppose if he was going to turn critical, he would have done so as a last ditch attempt to gain traction before dropping out. He doesn't have the courage.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
190 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1969 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS