82
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] warbosstodd@piefed.social 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

GOP: businesses have the right to refuse service!!!

Business: Hey fascist. Get out. You’re making people with moral compasses uncomfortable.

GOP: wait. No, not like that!

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

“Businesses have a right to deny minority groups, but denying me is ‘cancel culture’.”

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I know there are some members of this community who are at least as surprised that anybody living in Arkansas has a moral compass

[-] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

There are good people everywhere.

[-] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 5 points 2 weeks ago

There are definitely jerks everywhere. You're likely to notice them because they're apt to be disrespectful of your time, space, quietude, etc.

But the good people are certainly around too. You just might not notice them so easily because they do respect your right to exist independently of their intrusions.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 weeks ago

They don't even have a regular compass or they wouldn't be in Arkansas in the first place.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Check the full article (linked within the posted shorter article) and you'll find this...

"About an hour into the visit, a staff member approached someone on the security detail and "asked to encourage" the governor to leave, "as she had finished dining," according to the statement.

Since the restaurant has a 90-minute table limit, the security detail was approached a second time and asked to leave roughly 10 minutes before that time limit.

As they were leaving, the governor's staff said that a man allegedly yelled, “it’s time to go,” and then proceeded to make a crude hand gesture in the governor’s direction. The Croissanterie would say that man was a customer and not an employee."

Yeah, she just found out, that not only do people disagree with her views, she's also not special and not above the rules. Get gone, bye Felicia..

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Also not the first time she has been asked to leave a restaurant.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh shit, interesting. I'm in a different state, so she's not much on my radar, but would you have a link?

[-] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

How I will always see this woman.

As a former Arkansan, the moment she announced she was running for governor, I moved out of that state. Not even joking.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Sanders claimed the restaurant asked her to leave because she made their employees feel threatened, a claim the restaurant directly refuted.

That's... a valid reason to ask someone to leave.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

But, it wasn't the reason she was asked to leave. Odd, though, that she chose to claim she made the employees feel threatened, like that's something to boast about?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

My point is her explanation is “people were uncomfortable” as if that’s not a valid reason to ask someone to leave.

It is.

It very much is.

Especially if your security goons are acting like assholes questioning/stopping people, etc. (not saying they were but usually details like that will want as much control as they can legally take.)

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

She’s making me uncomfortable and I’m thousands of miles away

[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 7 points 2 weeks ago

She went to the place she wanted to go, with her guests and her security detail, and she got the food she wanted to eat. She had the chance to eat it.

Somehow even this write-up. which is not particularly sympathetic to her, is framing this as a kind of affront, a consequence, a humiliation. But she pretty much got what she came for, didn't she? She's facing no practical consequences at all. She lost a little face, maybe. This was a public declaration that people don't like her, don't like what priorities she's chosen to serve.

Maybe we wouldn't be in this pickle we're in, if this kind of getting-through-to-the-isolated-elites happened more often. If we didn't have isolated elites in the first place.

[-] protist@retrofed.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As Kinky Friedman once said:

We reserve the right to refuse service to you.
Take your business back to Walgreens!
Have you tried the local zoo?

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I’ll be honest, especially outside of their typical context, like the White House or haunted houses, ghouls would make me feel threatened too.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

So the authors did change "threatened" to "uncomfortable", but "asked to leave" to "thrown out."

Is this fair and balanced?

[-] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Looking at her would put me off my dinner too.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It just occurred to me that the likely many hundreds of emails between Trump and Epstein haven't been released yet.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh, no!

Was she denied her cheese plate?

I remember how very butthurt all these assholes were the first failed term of this dumbass "president" when this happened:

https://www.wonkette.com/p/hero-restaurant-gives-sarah-huckabee-sanders-the-boot

[-] voidsignal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

good. now throw that cow off the planet

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] voidsignal@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

you're right. I'm sorry, cows.

[-] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

She’s a guinea worm. A creature with no notable purpose in the world except to complete its lifecycle at the pain and expense of others. Literally the only parasite even hardcore animal rights and environmental groups don’t fight to save. Nobody likes the fucking guinea worm.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
82 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29216 readers
536 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS