114
What would you change? (media.piefed.social)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 46 points 2 months ago

CachyOS being the same level as mainstream as Mint and Ubuntu is copium.

[-] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

It’s the most popular single distro on ProtonDB now, so that’s something

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

Cachy is growing in popularity a lot. Negative publicity around Ubuntu is driving people to alternatives, and I've heard a lot of people are trying cachy as their first Linux distro.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People are trying cachy as their first Linux distro.

To anyone reading and thinking of switching:

DO NOT use CachyOS as your first distro. You will not like the experience, it was not made with total newbies in mind. It is Arch with a few bells and whistles, and you are not prepared to properly handle Arch, yet. You will get there later, if you want to.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, even Bazzite is less niche then CachyOS

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth 40 points 2 months ago

Some people don't like snaps

"Some people like snaps" would have been closer to the truth, but it would still be an exaggeration of their numbers.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago

You know what? I know they're far from the ideal solution, but I have installed a few things with snaps ... and it was fine. It worked seamlessly and painlessly (in some instances).

Generally, I'd prefer other ways to install, but snaps aren't the end of the world.

(This concludes my hot take of the day.)

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

snaps aren't the end of the world

System engineers all collectively shuddered at that thought. Then OS security nerds.

This is the "I tried heroin and it was good" story but for OSes

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How is Windows less corporate than MacOS or ChromeOS?

[-] candyman337@piefed.ca 13 points 2 months ago

Based on the image, it seems like the argument is that Windows can be installed on a larger variety of devices than the other two

[-] 7EP6vuI@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago

but then it should be "restricted" at top, and not "corporate"?

[-] rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but Microsoft shouldn't get credit for that. Windows only works with everything, because everything got built around it.

Drivers are needed for every little bit of hardware, Intel very well might not have become the dominant architecture if Microsoft hadn't picked it in the 80s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

How is Debian More niche than cachy?

[-] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 21 points 2 months ago

Lots of things wrong with this but one I haven't seen yet is that CachyOS literally depends on ArchLinux, yet is more "independent" than it?

These are terrible axis to try and plot operating systems, and limiting yourself to such low resolution with no overlap doesn't help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 21 points 2 months ago

Windows is less corporate than MacOS?

[-] Atropos@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

If we're talking hardware restrictions, sure I get it from the walled garden.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rodneylives@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

LOL at Windows being marked as less corporate than MacOS. They should absolutely be at least tied.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Literal megacorporations have run purely on Windows since the 90s and it’s not S-tier corporate? lol

[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Windows is not at the top of corporate possibly because it can be installed on non-homologated PCs.

[-] rodneylives@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

But on the other hand, all the reasons that people hate corporate OSes apply much more to Microsoft than Apple. Microsoft is the company that puts ads in their OS and is built entirely out of proprietary tech, and has been more vocal about shoehorning AI into everything.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That's a poor qualifier. Most corporations do not deploy MacOS to their employees. Windows belongs in the top right, if not a full line by itself for Corporate.

[-] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 months ago

if you live antwhere but the USA and Canada, MacOS is a niche, absolutely not mainstream at all, I see more linux users than MacBook users here in Brazil

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

macs are so rare that someone once screenshared and i was almost asking if that was gnome

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 13 points 2 months ago

implying that Arch is niche at this point

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 12 points 2 months ago

I'd make it 4x4 rather than 6x6 or fill it out a bit more.

[-] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Replace Haiku with TempleOS

EDIT: Also, put Windows in the top right corner to avoid the "is Microslop or Apple more corporate" discussion.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mech@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

Arch only breaks if you don't read the wiki.
Update the repo's gpg keys, read the Arch news, do what manual steps they mention and you can update it after a year and it won't break.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Arch only breaks if you don't read the wiki.

Finally found the ultimate reason why I'm not gonna use Arch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

with all due respect to the arch project and all, but I don't wanna do all that just to update my PC

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Arch Linux breaks if you don't update it often enough

pacman -S archlinux-keyring

It's really that easy

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

You forgot SuSE, as usual.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 2 months ago

SuSE too niche to even show up on this chart.

[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'll fight you in a ditch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

TL;DR: Winzozz is more corporate than Mac N' Cheese OS

Windows is so corporate, it actually succeeds in being the unquestionable lowest common denominator corpos love so much.

Not that MacOS is the champion and savior of FOSS, but as far as I know, Windows is much more hellbent on backwards compatibility and simply being available on as many types of devices as possible, while Apple at the very least pretends to focus on innovation rather than exponentially increasing profits and universal availability, with Apple products being status symbols and all.

[-] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

CachyOS a bit to the left. It is not at all mainstream in my bubble.

NixOS on the niche and corporate quadrant.

[-] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

GUIX top left

  • dictates to the OS how it has to be
  • requires a lot of reading theory
  • no ties to anduril

nixOS top right

  • dictates to the OS how it has to be
  • recruits people snatchers

context 1
context 2

Edit: Ah I missed the axes are not labeled like the common political compass. Nvm then. Put NixOS above RHEL and guix above arch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

Red Hat is based on Fedora, not the other way around.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] lian_drake@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Fedora isn't based ln RHEL, it was before, but now it's in fact the opposite. As far as I know, RHEL 10 is based on CentOS Stream 10, which in turn is based on Fedora 41.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maragato@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Why isn't openSUSE included in that table?

[-] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 2 months ago

Where do we put QubesOS

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Technically, if you stop updating arch when it's in a functional state it'll never break.

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

agreed. thats where I went wrong with my poor ee-pc. I went 3 years without updating it and it worked like a charm, then decided to try and update it. every source was dead, including the keyring. Manually fixed the ring, half the packages failed to update even with valid sources. Had to disable all package verification.

I then made the mistake of "Well surly a fresh install will be easier than trying to fix this broken mess".... I have not had a functional wifi management service since. None of them support the system anymore as the arch was discontinued officially a few years ago, and the only way I can connect to wifi now is via command line without network memory or saving.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
114 points (91.3% liked)

linuxmemes

31493 readers
45 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS