389
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] exohuman@programming.dev 156 points 1 year ago

One of those witnesses claimed that Brock punched the deputy, which camera footage does not show and the deputy did not allege.

I fucking hate people.

[-] Johnnypneumoniac@lemmy.one 41 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but also eye-witness testimony is notoriously inaccurate.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is why police shout "stop resisting!"

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a hero citizen, out there making up crimes that no one even asked them to.

[-] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

The deputy also claimed that he was punching Brock because Brock was biting him on the hand. The EMTs noted no bite marks, and the only injuries the deputy sustained were fractured knuckles from repeatedly punching Brock in the head. The video also doesn’t show any biting, and the biting claims were quietly dropped when the deputy learned that the whole thing had been captured on security cameras.

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

To play devil's advocate, it is perfectly possible that person genuinely saw it as that. Eyewitnesses in chaotic situations are inherently untrustworthy and prone to misinterpret things and even create false memories when questioned. Especially if it was someone that, naively, still trusted in cops for some reason, it's easy for the mind to create some assumed aggression by the victim, because only that way their worldview can remain intact ("a police officer wouldn't have been that brutal without good cause" as an assumption, basically.)

Still, I agree, it is wild. Especially since even the bastard assaulting the driver here didn't claim that. And I agree, it is also very much possible it was an overzealous fascist that just wanted to cover for the cops in a way more zealous than the cops themselves by consciously lying.

[-] Spike@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Eyewitnesses in chaotic situations are inherently untrustworthy and prone to misinterpret things and even create false memories when questioned

The general public has no idea how bad and unreliable eyewittnesses are. It's probably for the better.

[-] Dasnap@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago

The cop did this because he got flipped off. Even from a cynical point of view of this, this is a lot of effort for something so small.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Right, now imagine that you have an incredibly fragile ego, you peaked in highschool, and you perceive yourself as being above others because of your station in the police force.

I'm not shocked it happened. Just disgusted. He's the animal that should be behind bars, not enforcing the law.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Dangerous animals aren't generally afforded the privilege of being locked away. Just sayin'.

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Are air fresheners illegal in LA?

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

Technically yes, in the same way window tint or requiring a front license plate is.

The law is applied selectively to groups of people they don’t like and used as a justification to pull you over for doing nothing wrong.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
389 points (96.2% liked)

News

23388 readers
1775 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS