79
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 month ago

Thanks Fetterman (PA) and Heinrich (NM).

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago
[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

No comment.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 month ago

There’s always just the bare minimum needed. Illusion of opposition

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I strongly believe that Fetterman is a plant. He's 100% not colluding with the Democrats either as opposition, or for any nefarious means as you're suggesting.

No fucking clue where the other guy got the balls to do this very stupid fucking thing.

They're both gone soon, regardless.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

He's not just a plant, he's one bad sneeze away from being a vegetable.

[-] poopy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Brain damage will do that to you.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

54-45 is a pretty big gap for the Senate. Not even close to needing a tie breaker from the vp

[-] criscodisco@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I foresee this being a short tenure. Dude is obviously unqualified, but he is also shockingly stupid, and insecure as all hell.

Talking single digit Scaramuccis, here. He's gonna fuck this up so bad. We are entering storm season here in the US.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Not really. The vote was passing without the Democratic votes. It's just regular shitty centrism.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

At that point they're villains for the love of the game

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Seriously. Fetterman has brain damage and loves ICE, but what does the NM guy gain? He's simultaneously voting against funding ICE unchanged and thinks it's a great idea to put a violent thug at its head?

[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 month ago

Vote BLUE no Matter WHO!*

*Unless they WOULDNT help Republicans!

[-] choui4@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

"The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.

Also, the rotating villain theory is real, yall

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

They didn't defect, this is who they are

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
79 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29517 readers
471 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS