6
submitted 2 weeks ago by 8oow3291d@feddit.dk to c/world@lemmy.world

President Trump on Wednesday said he is considering the formation of a “joint venture” with Iran to set up tolls in the Strait of Hormuz after the Trump administration and Tehran agreed to a two-week ceasefire deal.

[...]

The president also suggested Monday that the U.S. could impose its own tolls on vessels trying to transit through the channel. Leaders in Tehran signaled last week it would install a “toll booth” system to exert a price on ships seeking safe passage through the strait.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wants his cut.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I know the man is just throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks, but the whiplash from "civilizational erasure" and "back to the Stone Ages" to "buddy-buddy halfsies on illegal tolls" is a little much.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

How brain is mush, and he started out with a bottom tier brain.

The bigger irony of this is that a Trump actually doing this would further turn the world away from the US. If it was just Iran imposing the toll, over time the international community would sour on Iran for not moving past the war. This would economically benefit the US more than any direct cashflow from a toll ever would, as it would stabilize devestment from America. Now nobody will ever blame Iran for the toll, solidifying the loss in American soft power forever.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

This strait dictates world economy? Of course trump wants to install a toll booth there with the money going straight to him and his cronies

All that after a war with Iran, of course

Deluded dipshit

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lmao Trump sees an opportunity to swindle and is all over it. Art of the deal!

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Art of the steal

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

God, what an idiot.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 2 weeks ago

lol dumpy swindling? SAY IT ISN’T SO!

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If Iran is sharing toll money with anyone, its China.

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is insane. I don't know why this hasn't got wider news coverage.

I were not able to find a better news article, but this news article somehow failed to mention the central fact that anybody demanding tolls, whether Iran or USA or both, is unambiguously illegal under international law. It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships. Legal Eagle describes why the tolls are illegal: Trump’s Illegalist War Gets Illegaler.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships.

Says who? May I introduce you to the wonderful world of gunboat diplomacy? /s

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 2 weeks ago

Says who?

The most extraordinary thing here is perhaps that the US is not saying so. With Trump talking about imposing tolls. It used to be that like the #1 priority of Pax Americana was to insure international freedom of navigation.

But Trump just casually throws that out the window, I assume in an unvetted 2AM Truth Social rant (I haven't actually checked where and when Trump said it).

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

How long though till Trump is the US, though?

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 2 weeks ago

Trump is President. Trump is the US right now. It is dangerous to pretend he is not.

And it is not just an aberration. Congress could remove Trump any time they wanted to. But they do not.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 2 weeks ago

Trump will be the US until he dies ( probably not for ages just to spite his haters)

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago

It’s fully within the territorial waters of Iran or Oman. I’m not an international law expert but it seems that it’s a practiced convention not a legally enforceable rule.

Besides, international law is about who has the bigger stick.

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 2 weeks ago

not a legally enforceable rule.

Anything is enforceable with enough bombs, if there is a will. Any previous US President, Democrat or Republican, would have enforced it no question.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

K? Are we supposed to look up to previous US presidents as authorities on international law?

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
6 points (80.0% liked)

World News

55710 readers
185 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS