99
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 44 points 1 week ago

Why would someone buy Starfield?

[-] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

I pirated it and wish I could get my seed time back.

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

The wear on my mouse from clicking on the torrent already wasn't worth it.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

I fucking bought it, imagine my despair

[-] Klear@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I played it a tad too long to be refunded

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 1 week ago

My condolences.

[-] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've had a lot of fun with it on Xbox since launch

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Because influencers tell them to? It’s not like Xbox players haven’t been taking about the bugs and other issues for the last few years.

But really though. The gun play is fun ads hell, just like any Bethesda game. And, it’s true, you can build a ship, take off, walk around in it… there’s a certain appeal to that. The guts are there to make a decent game. They just don’t love it quite as much as the least of the four fans who still play it.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Bethesda games notoriously have shitty gun play.

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

True, but developers from id Software helped Bethesda specifically for Starfield's gunplay, which is actually fun this time around compared to Fallout 4.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

First Bethesda game?

[-] Doom@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

What year is it? Didn't we already do this?

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Not even a proper release on PS5. Glitchy as hell and not complete on disk for physical. Embarrassing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I have about 140 hours in the game on PC, since launch. I haven't played it since. I was just poking around the mods at Nexus, I see the Genesis thing. That might be worth playing it again.

Mods keep Bethesda games going, I have over 6700 hours in FO4. That's only because of the mods.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sadly mods won't fix the fact you have to play a loading screen.

The fact that Bethesda thought they could get away with their ancient engine once again is laughable.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I'm willing to bet that you've never actually played Starfield, you're just parrotting what others have complained about.

Does Starfield have problems? Yes. But anyone who goes "hurr durr ancient engine" clearly hasn't played a Bethesda game since Skyrim

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It amazes me that people are talking about this garbage game in 2026. I got it for free a few years ago and couldn’t be arsed to actually play it once I realized how boring it was

[-] SirHery@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nononno, you don't understand, with the new update it finally got even more boring and we have new expensive ships.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

You bought a Bethesda game before a community patch was available.

They knew what they were doing.

[-] SethW@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That doesnt work this time because the modding community abandoned it quickly after launch due to them just not enjoying the game enough to work on it -- I was expecting to do this one with VR but it remains unfinished

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Still does because they should just continue to wait until it’s there before buying.

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

They saw the mess it was on PC and somehow thought it was going to be a good idea to buy it?...

[-] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

LOL imagine creating a game that runs like total ass on a powerful PC and then releasing it on Playstation...

[-] nocturne@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

lol I sent this article to my brother and he sent me like 20 texts defending the game.

[-] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Be kind to him, he's in a abusive relationship with them 😁

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I feel like Bethesda had their moment in the sun with Skyrim and Fallout 3, but since those days they really haven't made a big RPG that's felt good.

And as I enter hour 120+ in Kingdom Come Deliverance 2, still happily playing DLC and side quests, I can't imagine wanting to go back to play a Bethesda RPG. They've been lapped, in my opinion, at this point.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

They're still in an Xbox 360 mindset, in a world where Baldur's Gate 3 and KCD2 exist.

Action gamers are spoiled for choice. RPG gamers are spoiled for choice. I just don't see where Bethesda's "here's a wonky game engine and a big map" approach fits in that.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Even the "big map" thing is done better by other companies at this point.

There's basically one loading screen in KCD2 (besides pure fast travel) and it's between the two giant maps in the game. Otherwise, you can walk Henry's silly ass from one end of the map to the other and go into any number of buildings and never see a loading screen.

And most games do this type of asset streaming now, so when Bethesda rolls up with a "open world" RPG with loading screens all over the place it's like "what is this?"

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

The thing is you can do massive maps without having to use something custom. So they really have no excuse for continuing to stick with their massively out of date wonkfest of an engine

[-] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago

The game was trash on the PC, and they thought that downgrading it to a console was going to make it playable?

[-] entwine@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I recently tried playing it again, and I wouldn't say it's "trash". Yes, they completely dropped the ball on the exploration part of their exploration game, but the meat and bones of a Bethesda RPG are still in there. It's a good time for anyone bored of replaying Skyrim and/or Fallout if you get it on sale.

Also it runs perfectly on Linux

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

This. Bethesda cheaped out on environmental storytelling and fleshed out characters (which is unfortunate since that's their thing). But the systems they've built up in Creation Engine have gotten really good

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

The thing that ruined it for me was the story just kinda falls apart and the society they made seems laughably small, like total universe has like 30,000 total people in it. Then you add in the loading into loading to watch a cutscene to cover a loading of the next area and the kinda bad ship combat. Eh the end result is not the worst game, but not a game that anyone should pay more then like $15 for.

[-] 0li0li@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's a Thebesda game, right?

[-] 58008@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I liked Starfield (I even 100%ed the achievements on Steam). I also loved No Man's Sky long before the shift in pubic sentiment towards it, so maybe I'm just weird. But if you're reading this and thinking "this guy wouldn't know a good game if it shat a voxel-based turd onto his chest", you're WRONG. I also loved MindsEye. So there.

[-] absquatulate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Omg me too! Wasn't there a marketing term for person that tends to buy only failed products and based on them liking a product they could predict whether it would fail or not? Always thought I'm one of those. Mafia 3 - loved it, but hated mafia 2. Love AC 1,3 and syndicate but didn't vibe with 2 or black flag. Loved Borderlands 1, hated all the sequels etc. Still, I feel the hate against starfield is way overblown and there's too much polarization. A game can be either great or awful, with no more room for meh games.

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It’s not even fully on the disk. Trash release.

[-] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 1 week ago

Imagine spending money on Starfield instead of NMS, eeeesh...

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

I played 300 hours of this game when it came out and stopped playing right before the final mission.

You can definitely tell it all went wrong when they decided to do thousands of procedural generated worlds instead of a tight dozen or so.

Another aspect where they went wrong was having the Constilation home base be on the capital planet instead of being your space ship. You know, like how it is on every sci-fi show from Firefly, to Star Trek, to The Expanse.

I've played so many Bethesda games that the tricks they used to make the engine and environments seem larger and more sophisticated stick out like a sore thumb.

All that is to say, there was absolutely a great game in Starfield somewhere.

[-] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So a normal Bethesda launch. Has no one told these "gamers" what they were buying?

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

on Playstation no less, notoriously shit at running bethesda games (see new vegas)

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

No surprise there, Bethesda didn't fix shit for any of the re-re-re-re-releases of Skyrim, why would anyone think they'd do that for Starfield?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
99 points (99.0% liked)

Games

48056 readers
108 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS