151
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Qualcomm brings receipts: Snapdragon X Elite gets benchmarked, completely dunks on Apple’s M2 processor::Qualcomm made big claims with its Snapdragon X Elite platform and Oryon CPU, but the company proved it to the press last week with a special benchmarking session where we could witness just how powerf

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Competition is good.

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not like I'm a Qualcomm fan, but this sounds great. If Linux support is good (and I'm guessing it'll be), my next laptop may be Qualcomm inside.

I'm specially interested in seeing if these laptops will be able to have Coreboot, that would be fantastic.

[-] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

now just imagine if we had full linux support of mobiles

[-] zingo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Google be bye gone!

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn’t really surprise since Qualcomm hired the geniuses behind the M series.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

When will it actually release and by that point how far away is the M3?

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Also important, will it be available and affordable. I don't much care about arm laptops if they cost an arm (heh) and a leg to buy and then a couple fingers to import into the mythical and exotic land of not-US.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Considering a severe lack of software support on ARM they better have a massive cost incentive

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

As per usual, Linux is fine with ARM.

[-] Radium@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Most things are fine on arm these days. Don’t know what this person is on about

[-] L_Acacia@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Windows is not fine with ARM, which can be a turnoff for some.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I bet it will be fine with arm fairly quickly now that these chips are on the horizon.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I doubt it. Many windows applications still are 32 bit only today. Visual studio only got 64 bit support in 2022. Windows has a long history of backwards compatibility and I would expect to be depending on software compatibility layers for a decade or more, even for some Microsoft products.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

The 20 reference laptops doing the benchmarking in this article were running on windows....

[-] L_Acacia@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Being able to run benchmarks doesn't make it is a great experience to use unfortunately. 3/4 of applications don't run or have bugs that the devs don't want to fix.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Could you name a few? Just curious if its very specific stuff or apps I might actually use.

[-] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A lot of x86 software is still just emulated for arm, not native.

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Most things are fine on arm these days

MacOS? Yes. Linux? Sure. Android? Obviously. Windows? Not a chance!

And seeing this is designed for laptops, your options will be either Linux or Windows. The comment is on point.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

The benchmarks from this article are running on Windows 11 Arm...

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh don't get me wrong, it definitely runs!

But have you tried using it as a daily driver? Most things will break. I discovered this the hard way by installing it in a Raspberry Pi

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Was it just because it was arm, or because it was a raspberry pi and had too little of everything else windows likes to hog up? There's several major laptop manufacturers that are planning to sell laptops with these. I doubt that would be the case if they were all functionally broken to the consumer.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Caveat for all platforms running wine applications. So Linux is fine, except when running windows applications.

Well, mostly, there do exist binary only Linux applications too. Business applications and also some games with native Linux support.

[-] Chobbes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’d imagine most open source software will just be perfectly fine on ARM on Linux… but I do wonder a little bit about the occasional x86 binary blob we run. They’re generally pretty rare in Linux land… but Steam games are probably not going to have a great time. I’ve used binfmt_misc to run ARM binaries on x86 transparently before using qemu, and it works perfectly fine… but it’s dog slow.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If anything Steam's support for something else other than i386 is long overdue.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Radium@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

M3 is available starting next week so not very.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The answer is in the article...

It is worth noting that by the time Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite hits store shelves, Apple’s M3 line of CPUs (which are expected to be announced this week) and Intel’s next-gen Meteor Lake laptops processors with its beefy NPU and GPU, will be the new competition.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They'll have to compete in price to have any chance

[-] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

That really depends on the TDP of the Intel and AMD chips. Both have been progressively pumping more and more juice into their silicon lately in an attempt to be the "fastest".

If Qualcomm is within spitting distance at a much lower TDP then this might actually be the beginning of the end for x86.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I guess we'll have to wait for price, benchmarks, and battery life

[-] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

I'm cautiously optimistic, a new player in PC silicon is exciting if nothing else.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I guess more competition is better

[-] eek2121@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The M3 was announced yesterday: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/10/everything-to-know-about-apples-new-m3-m3-pro-and-m3-max-processors/

It will be out before these chips are. So will next gen x86-64 chips, Zen 5 at least, and possibly Intel Arrow Lake depending on timing.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apple just announced its M3 line of processors, and they’re shipping next week.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Don't know how to read an article?

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago
[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago

By what apple revealed on the m3, it looks like it's still going to lose out on cpu, ai, and tdp. Might come close on graphics performance but overall it won't be good enough.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Qualcomm caused quite a stir last week with its long-awaited announcement of its Snapdragon X Elite platform based on its new Oryon CPU, creating what some are calling the "Apple Mac Moment" for Windows.

During Qualcomm’s keynote, the company went on stage with some fancy graphs and a few handpicked benchmarks, putting it up against Intel’s best 13th-generation Core laptop CPUs and Apple’s M2 (and even M2 Max in one scenario).

More importantly, when we turned around, there were well over 20 Oryon-powered laptops with Geekbench 6, Cinebench 24, PCMark 10, Procyon AI, and 3Dmark WildLife Extreme and Aztec Ruins (pre-commercial builds).

But, similar to Apple, that platform can range from low TDP (thermal design power; basically, how much wattage the chip draws) to very high, with or without fans.

Each time you run a benchmark, the score fluctuates depending on external and internal thermal conditions or any Windows background processes that may temporarily be active.

It is worth noting that by the time Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite hits store shelves, Apple’s M3 line of CPUs (which are expected to be announced this week) and Intel’s next-gen Meteor Lake laptops processors with its beefy NPU and GPU, will be the new competition.


The original article contains 1,296 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

on PCMark's webpage the fastest mobile cpu is R9 7945HX with 14k marks. How did they manage to score only 9k in the article?

Passmark already has the latest threadrippers scored, topping the charts at 156k points. As a comparison the 7950X is at 63k points, 7945HX at 56k points, apple m2 ultra 24 core 49k points. So as long as you have the watts to spare x86 will be more powerful?

[-] Batbro@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

A solid bye Felicia for me

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The article shows a low- and high-powered version of the qualcomm chips - will users of these chips be able to change the power profile of these chips themselves, or will they be locked in before they are sold?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
151 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
1100 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS