1751
me_irl (a.mindlycdn.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

alt texttweet by amtrak ben: i think we should build high speed rail next to freeways only because it would make drivers feel like complete losers all the time

edit: fixed alt text

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] telllos@lemmy.world 109 points 1 year ago

It doesn't need to go high speed, I was in a train a few years ago and the conductor on the loud speaker said "if you look on your left, you will be happy to be in a train and not stuck in a traffic jam." Everyone looked and the highway was completely stuck. Really Really long traffic jam. Everyone started giggling.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I wish the train was affordable

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago

The one thing Germany did right in the last like 20 years: Deutschlandticket. One ticket, 49€ per month, regional/local public transport for all of Germany. I can literally take a bus from my apartment to the train station, hop on an RE train and go wherever I want, and then take the local bus in that town.

It doesn't include long haul highspeed trains, but the regional trains will still get you almost everywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago

This is the case in Germany, and it's glorious. The fastest people on the Autobahn drive around 200 km/h, whereas the trains sometimes travel at 320 km/h. Always fun to see the slow cars!

[-] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Likewise Spain with the AVE. Cars are speed limited to 130 max I think, so it looks like the cars are stopped.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 year ago

I don't know if Deutsche Bahn is the best example of this. ICE's maximum speed only means you usually end up leaving when you are supposed to be arriving.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Well, Deutsche Bahn is the place where I experience exactly what the meme is suggesting. Should I have mentioned another rail service I don't know and haven't experienced?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] But_Class_War@midwest.social 79 points 1 year ago

That works. The local L trains running along side the highway in Chicago got me, seeing 5 trains roll by while barley moving in bumper to bumper gave me the final push to covert to public transit

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 68 points 1 year ago

The number of people I've met who will never take Amtrak again because they saw one delay, but will sit in gridlock for an hour each way to/from work to go 10 miles without blinking an eye drives me batty

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I'd take Amtrak in a heartbeat if meaningful service actually existed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HalfAHero@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

This is what infuriates me on every interstate freeway drive is that Eisenhower didn't just lay tracks along the median of every intestate. If we had done it then, we'd have an entire network for the most heavily utilized corridors with natural station locations.

It isn't even about being stuck in traffic, it's also about the mind-numbing expanse that would be much more enjoyable if I didn't have to pay attention.

[-] comador@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

As a California native who has commuted 2hrs a day to work for decades, but got to live in the UK for a year: I was way more productive when I commuted by light rail/subway.

Instead of looking out for aholes looking to break check, cut you off, deny you changing lanes; I was able to respond to emails, make some calls and even have a descent breakfast off the morning truck while sitting in a wifi available seat traveling into London from Gatwick each day. Way less stressful overall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DocSportello@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Frankfurt - Cologne: about twice as fast by train then by car.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Is that the one ICE track where it can actually come near its max speed?

[-] DocSportello@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It goes at about 300 km/h on that track.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] justJanne@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago

The ICE's max speed depends on model and variies from 250km/h to 300km/h. These speeds can be reached on:

  • Hannover-Würzburg (280km/h)
  • Mannheim-Stuttgart (280km/h)
  • Oebisfelde-Berlin (250km/h)
  • Siegburg-Frankfurt (300km/h)
  • Köln-Düren (250km/h)
  • Rastatt-Offenburg & Schliengen-Haltingen (250km/h)
  • Nürnberg-Ingolstadt (300km/h)
  • Ebensfeld-Leipzig/Halle (300km/h)
  • Wendlingen-Ulm (250km/h)

There are more of these tracks currently under construction:

  • Stuttgart-Wendlingen (250km/h)
  • Bashaide-Rastatt (250km/h)

And many more are currently in the planning stage:

  • Hamm-Bielefeld (300km/h)
  • Oebisfelde-Berlin (300km/h)
  • Ulm-Augsburg (300km/h)
  • Gelnhausen-Fulda (250km/h)
  • Frankfurt-Mannhein (300km/h)
  • Bielefeld-Hannover (300km/h)
  • Nürnberg-Würzburg (300km/h)
[-] MrMagnesium12@feddit.de 46 points 1 year ago

Let me present: the new constructed high speed rail line Wendlingen-Ulm, next to Autobahn 8.

Bahn

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 year ago

Also, in the US this could help bypass land-use issues. If you use the right-of-way the interstate highways already have, you don’t need to have a legal fight over building on privately held land.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ray@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

There actually was a transportation agency that had an ad campaign oriented around this idea. Basically people in the cars saw the train going by so fast and felt jealous because they were stuck in their cars.

Anyone remember what agency put this on?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I have no idea, but I remember a great ad DB brought out: A picture of cars bumper to bumper in a traffic jam, under it "Bumper to bumper is definitely the right approach. Now safely accelerate to 300km/h".

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

They did this where I am from, but the high speed trains cost way too much yo be worth it and they never travel at their full speed and are about the same speed as a car.

You also HAVE to drive to the train station. And by the time you wait for the train and pay for parking, you might as well just drive into the city.

In fact, it hardly saves time or money and often ends up being about the same cost and time.

Also the last train leaves the city shortly after the work day ends. So if you work late or get held up, then you are not going home or paying a crap ton for a Uber home.

It’s just fucked and I hate that it is that way.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"High speed rail" means intercity rail (think airplane or Greyhound bus replacement), not commuter rail or metro rail. That makes sense to put along a freeway because there's generally only one direct freeway connection between each pair of major metro areas.

I agree that it doesn't make sense to put commuter rail or metro rail adjacent to a freeway. Ideally, it would be the opposite: the routes radiating from the city should have the freeways and rail lines spread as far apart from each other as possible, so that commuters in different areas have good access to either one mode or the other, rather than some having good access to both and others neither.

[-] kungen@feddit.nu 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they never travel at their full speed

Why? Too much risk someone will be close to the tracks?

If following Hanlon's razor, that entire situation sounds like someone proposed "we need trains going into the city", set it up, and called it a day.

The train I usually take saves maybe only like 15 minutes (normally about an hour to drive), but at least you can do more stuff on the train rather than sitting at the wheel.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

In Illinois, there is an Amtrak line from Chicago to St Louis that isn't high speed, but it is "higher speed." It has stretches that it goes 110mph. Not hugely fast, but much faster than the 65-70mph speed limit on the interstate, it is alongside much of the way. I've rode it once, and it was cool to look out the window and watch as we passed by cars with ease. I've only had a taste, and it makes me want more.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Alterecho@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Joke's on you, I have a humiliation kink

[-] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Public transportation in the US is abysmal.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

You can experience this in multiple parts of Los Angeles. Don't tell anyone. It's fucking glorious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AKADAP@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

In California, any time I have seen an Amtrack train going the same direction as me on the freeway, I was passing it, never the other way around.

[-] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

America's rail is almost all low-speed or higher-speed (125-150 mph, but much lower average speeds)

For comparison, China has built ~20,000 miles of HSR, much of which goes up to 220, some lines averaging 200 mph.

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That would be because Amtrak is not a high-speed rail. They barely maintain their rails and so they have to go quite slowly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
1751 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9818 readers
137 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS