516

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/46206701

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 85 points 2 days ago

If anything, it underscores the importance of actually having nuclear weapons as a deterrence. If Iran actually did have nukes we would not be picking fights with them

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 66 points 2 days ago

Ukraine as well. One is a story about why you should try to aquire nuclear weapons as quickly as possible and the other is a story about why you should never give them up, even if you think it's a bad idea that you have them and have serious doubts that you could maintain them safely or use them effectively.

It's like goddamned advertising for nukes.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

It never occurred to me that the beef the US has with other countries having nukes is because it would put them on even footing. No nukes = no leverage.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

TBF lots of countries think everyone having nukes is a bad idea. It's just so nice to be one of the few that does...

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago

only three countries have ever had nukes and willingly handed them over to de-escalate tensions about everyone having nukes: Ukraine, Belarus, and Pakistan. All three are consistent battlegrounds of the global northern empires now. the nuclear countries have demonstrated, it seems, to the global south that the adults table at the UN is who has nukes and if you get nukes and give them up, you will be punished for your good faith

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Uhh, Pakistan still has a bunch of nukes, Kazakhstan gave theirs up at the same time as the other two, and South Africa had them and gave them up. Also there's no war in Pakistan, and only war at a low level in Belarus (and they're the aggressor).

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

thanks. i wrote that up real fast and i got my countries mixed up. and in the case of Belarus what i was talking about is that their existence as a russian colony has been perhaps more strongly cemented than back when they were a union republic of the ussr

[-] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Pakistan couldn't lose their nukes, they need them to MAD with India

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

yeah i don't even know why in my head i didn't flag that when i was literally thinking about how anxiety inducing it is how many of the nations with nukes are run by authoritarian freaks

[-] Geobloke@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

What about South Africa?

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

While I agree broadly with what you said, Pakistan has kept their nukes, and is therefore quite independent. Belarus is also fine, since they're a Russian protectorate.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Well yeah then they wouldn't be able to jack boot their way around the world causing problems.

Imagine how much better it would be if the US military had maybe 10% less funding and that money was spent on infrastructure or social services. Can't have that so they have to justify the massive military expense by having nearly constant wars. If no obvious conflict presents itself, invent one, and then lose.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Sure but st the same time. If iran was seeking a nuke years ago . The usa eould have attacked earlier when Iran was weaker

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 42 points 2 days ago

because Iran is weeks away from building the atomic bomb since 1995

[-] m4xie@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That is kind of true though, but months rather than weeks.

The thing is, if a guy has a disassembled rifle on the table in front of him and you have a ready gun trained on him, he is minutes away from having a functional rifle but he will always remain so.

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 52 points 3 days ago

One of the identifiers of fascism is that one's enemy is strong, needing to be stopped, and so weak they could never resist us.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Anyone that hasn’t read Umberto Eco’s essay Ur Fascism that this notion is from should get on it.

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This basically applies to not only the US and Israel, but also to what Russia does towards Ukraine.

[-] ddplf@szmer.info 1 points 1 day ago

It applies everywhere there is a populist political agitation. The immigrants are parasitic freeloaders and they are here to steal your job!

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Exactly. It's textbook nazi propaganda, where they said that the jews are a subhuman, degenerated race, but they also somehow insiduously control the entire world from the shadows. Like which is it now? Below or above typical intelligence and power? Both, in the world of the fascists.

[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago

Not to mention that they blew up the supreme leader who had issued a complete and total ban on nuclear weapons

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

While true the fatwa do not get removed by the desth of the supreme leader. The new one should remove it. It doesn't seem the fatwa with be removed

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

Does Iran even need a full fledged navy to keep the straight closed? The straight is narrow. A couple of gun boats and missiles launched from shore would be enough to keep most commercial shipping out.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

They can attack ships with drones or even cannons. You don't even need to hit every ship. Even one in every ten will send insurance rates to the moon.

[-] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

... In the shithouse that Donald built.

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
516 points (99.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

8132 readers
61 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS