42
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by XLE@piefed.social to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Full article: Firefox browser has started shipping Brave's adblock-rust engine

After seeing a lot of backlash over Waterfox adding Brave's adblock engine:

It looks like Waterfox is piggy-backing off of Firefox’s implementation (great!).

And it's been there for a little while.

Mozilla bundled adblock-rust (Brave’s Rust-based adblock engine, the same one my team works on) into Firefox. Pretty exciting to see them finally start taking ad & tracker blocking seriously; I didn’t think I’d see this day. It landed in Firefox 149 via via Bugzilla Bug 2013888.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Matth@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What's the difference with ublock and why not contact ublock developer to propose to integrate it instead of what did Brave? Article don't mention what is better with adblock rust! :-/

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Probably for the same reason that Waterfox developers gave: Because uBO is GPL licensed and combining with an MPL licensed codebase makes things complicated for downstream developers who cannot GPL license their codebase.

The Brave module is MPL licensed already.

Sure, I would prefer that everything is GPL, but it's not my project.

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Because Rust is cool and JavaScript sucks

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah as much as I love ublock origin and use it heavily. I support more rust on more things. 60+% of browser CVE are memory issues. Rust was explicitly made to stop those.

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Do you think that Javascript has manual memory management?

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

No, but it's nowhere near as strict in its management. Plenty of memory issues can still usually from unintentionally maintaining a reference to an object. forgotten global variables, uncleared timers (setInterval), or closures that stay in scope longer than necessary.

And ofc you now have the performance overhead of GC constantly running

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

I wonder how they actually implement it, given that the corporation runs an advertising network.

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

22669 readers
23 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS