487
Noble dude
Old men planting trees.
Honestly. He's helping pave the way so that people who have heart issues could potentially have replacements one day. Not just old dudes, but kids too.
Even if pig hearts never pan out, he got 6 more weeks with his loved ones.
That's a nice metaphor.
friendly reminder that you do not need to be old to plant trees. If you have a choice to take part in a scientific study, please do. Its usually quite easy.
personally for me it was a double blind study about tapering from steroids. so a month of tapering (or not, idk, it was blind), and then a few phone calls over 6 months.
Thank you so much for participating in that. That's not an exciting thing to study, but man it's important in deciding what's the best course of treatment for patients. Your life might not have been on the line, but I still think you're a hero and I appreciate you.
aww thank you so much
Humanity thanks him for his sacrifice
This comment is so good I read it aloud to others. You win English today.
It's a paraphrase. "Society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they will never sit in." There are many versions across history. But no matter its source, it's a lovely sentiment.
My grandpa had a pig heart valve, and that thing lasted way longer than its warranty suggested. Yeah, he was told up front it would last ten years, but he got more out of it.
That's good to hear. The return policy for those things tend to be absolute garbage.
One could say he's past the point of no return.
The final threshold.
A lot of people think that regular human transplants are problem free but the vast majority of them are rejected by the receiver. If it’s for a life saving procedure it can only extend the life span by so much…
My dad had a double lung transplant several months ago...we were told by his transplant team that, with transplants, rejection is a "when", not an "if". However, if caught early enough, the docs can do an incredible amount to combat rejection.
Complete layperson here but it kind of astounds me that we haven't cracked the code for this friend-or-foe identification. One would think there is some identifier or expression that is evaluated by the immune system and if we could match that we'd be golden but clearly not that simple.
We can’t even cure autoimmune diseases yet. Why the fuck has my immune system decided my own tissues are the enemy?! Such a dick move.
Fucking confused white blood cells need to figure out their shit
I started reading the book Immune by the team that runs the Kurzgesagt (In a Nutshell) YouTube channel. The book is written for laypeople like us to understand, but I didn't get very far before going "holy shit this is ridiculously complicated". Honestly, just the fact that scientists understand any of this astounds me.
Rheumatologists are practicing alchemy, I'm convinced.
Years of dedication, my friend.
Surprisingly, things become simpler when there are more eyes looking at them. The more esoteric something is, the harder it will be to grasp because there are fewer resources to help you.
Taking immunology right now, it's incredibly complicated. Immune cells aren't like any other cells in our bodies, they're absolutely bonkers.
Our bodies are just winging it. It's both beautiful and goodness and all kinds of other things but it's a bit philosophical at times.
I had ITP. Autoimmune something which means they don't know what caused it but my body stopped acknowledging that parts of my blood cell, not the entire one just a piece of it, we're not me. Of course not me gets flushed out.
But the fancy words for part of a blood cell is called a platelet if you don't have any platelets you don't clot. As you can probably pick up not being able to clot is a big problem. I was in danger of bleeding out because my body decided to take out all my platelets.
Seems like an easy problem. If a whole blood cell is me because the DNA matches and all kinds of other things, obviously one cell of me is one cell of me. But if you take one cell of me and you break it up into pieces is it still one cell of me? By definition is not it is 50% of me....
So one cell of me is obviously me and one cell of you is obviously you but what happens when we get into percents at what percent does my cell stop becoming me?
Biology is not as simple as 1s and 0s. We want it too be. But it's just more complex.
Your body has the miraculous ability to identify ANYTHING that isn’t itself: viruses, fungi, bacteria, even lots of nearly-self things like cancer.
It’s likely not a solvable problem.
Oh it is... we just need to get over the idiots that don't like stem cell research. If we could clone and grow our own organs it would be a huge step.
It’s likely not a solvable problem.
I doubt that.
Fair enough.
These are very complicated processes that are difficult to interpret with such a (relatively) small number of people looking at it.
Honestly, this might sound weird, but if my body ever got to that point, I'd rather just go die in a war.
Better to go out with a bang than a wimper, imo.
Lmao yeah you say that now
I’m just curious if you have data behind this?
My understanding is that rejection related deaths in solid organ transplant recipients is only ~18% and that it is actually trending downward.
It's tough, these folks are often already in multiorgan failure because those organs were trying to hold up for their failing heart. So now you've got shot kidneys and lungs but a brand new heart to try and hold up those failing organs. Then you end up right back into heart failure.
I don't want people to see this as a failure.
Experiments are how we gain new information to try better the next time.
Ultimately these experiments are reserved for people who are ineligible for traditional heart transplants. This person was granted an extra six weeks with their family which is easy to overlook but the family likely cherished every moment.
I guess we'll have to wait a bit to find out what killed him. The first person died due to several things like his condition and the heart had a pig virus.
The pathogen issue is a real hurdle to overcome. I am wondering if we will get viable 3D printed hearts before we get viable transplants from other species.
3D-printed or stem-cell grown so they’re just new, hot-swappable copies of our own organs, minus defects thanks to CRISPR 🤯
Griffith had performed the experimental surgery
Fitting name
?
This is what OP is talking about: Griffin
What about: https://berserk.fandom.com/wiki/Griffith
I don't know anything about that lore, but it may be a better match.
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
487 points (98.6% liked)
News
23397 readers
2503 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS